![]() | This user may have left Wikipedia. Bruvensky has not edited Wikipedia since September 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
|
No, the plot follows the book. See my thoughts on the discussion page. Czolgolz (talk) 20:36, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Since you have edited the article or its talk page, I'd like to let you know that the article English conjugation tables has been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English conjugation tables. Duoduoduo (talk) 17:27, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
How do I get involved?
![]() |
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new ((help me)) request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page. |
How do I contact the people involved in the process? bruvensky (talk) 16:00, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new ((help me)) request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page. |
I got a message from someone, and I want to respond to them. Do I just type something on their talk page? bruvensky (talk) 18:31, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the ((admin help)) template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
I want to see the conjugation tables undeleted. All the people who wanted deletion did nothing for the table. They only wanted to have some power to say no. It seems that the decision to delete it was based on the number of people who were against it, and not on the merits of arguments.
As for the tables themselves, yes they are cumbersome and need improvement, but I have helped many people from all over the world with their English by bringing them to the page and explaining things to them.
I want to make a new page and use copyrighted material. I am in the process of getting permission. Once I get it, how do I note the permission on the page? Can you tell me a couple pages that do a good job of noting the permission. Also I want to make the page for now with just a description of the material that I want to use. This is because the publisher of the material has a form with fields for the url and date of the web page. Does this seem alright to you?
![]() |
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, place a new ((help me)) request on this page followed by your questions, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
bruvensky (talk) 07:12, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
I just found out about the volunteer response team. I don't understand why I need to involve other people if I get the permission.bruvensky (talk) 07:39, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I have read the pages about using copyrighted material. As far as I can see, all I am supposed to do is send a request that explains that anyone can copy, modify and re-use material. Is this correct, or is there more to it? And what about the Volunteer Response Team?bruvensky (talk) 16:32, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Well mine is going to be a little more complicated. I am making my request to Bantam Books, a division of Random House. They have a form that I have to fill out and mail in. Then they will mail their response. In this case, what do I do?
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
When they send the email, then how will I know about it?
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
This is getting more complicated. The material I am looking to get is some text. For it to be uploaded by someone else, then I would have to give it to them ahead of time. Who would that be? Instead of this process, how about when they send their permission, then I enter the text into the page, so that it is formatted correctly, and so it is placed in the page where it makes the most sense? bruvensky (talk) 20:02, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, place a new ((help me)) request on this page followed by your questions, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I got a notification that someone reversed my edit on the Sam Fuller page, but I don't know how to go back and see what was done.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Gashole , it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. --Frze > talk 08:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.
The edit summary appears in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Frze > talk 06:29, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
with --~~~~ Thanks --Frze > talk 08:14, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
You wrote: " There is nothing wrong with showing people things, but I feel that you are telling me what to do. "
Hi, Bruvensky. Thank you for all your contributions to en.Wikipedia!
I have been reading the article GasHole, and I propose to revert one of your changes. As you made it in 2014, I decided to transcribe that discussion here as a courtesy, in case GasHole is no longer on your watchlist. Here is what I said:
"This page needs lots of help, and I would not discourage you from working on it. I concur on your point about water-injection, which actually CAN improve efficiency, but, as you state, is not about using water as fuel. "That said, I have to take issue with 'plot'. The word plot is usually used in fiction, or in stories based on fact, but written in story form. 'Synopsis' is the more correct term for a concise summary of the facts presented and the points made in a documentary. Unless I see a cogent argument here [on the Discussion page] against, I intend to change the subhead back to 'Synopsis.' "But, please, edit on! Continue to be bold. Fight the good fight! There is much to do, and all available hands are needed on deck. "For the harvest is great, and the workers are few." Rags (talk) 01:31, 22 March 2016 (UTC)"
I hope you can see my point. No one else seems concerned about this page, so I thought I'd put it directly to you. Thank you for your consideration. Rags (talk) 03:11, 22 March 2016 (UTC)