This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | → | Archive 20 |
Hi Chip, saw your comments on the article. This article was first submitted on Aug 1 when I had the same review comments - seems like an advt. I had therefore modified the text to make it more suitable for an encyclopedia. The second time it was reviewed, I checked with the reviewer and the only thing which was missing was independent, verifiable references. Hence, it beats me that the article gets declined again for seeming like an advt. Will you pls let me know which section of this article should be modified now? Thx. Godimrm (talk) 02:31, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi, in response to this [1], I'm informing you that I've tried many times to discuss with those users but theyr're close minded because they're here to insert and protect their propaganda, they're not here to improve the article...for example, they're inserting RASD Flags in neutral articles (western sahara, saharawi people,...), I think I've to demand an arbitration from administrators.--Yusuf ibn Tashfin (talk) 18:04, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
FYI, chanserv's up again. Mdann52 (talk) 19:08, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Chip,
I have created an account with user name: Search24 I have also created an article ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/SEARCH24ONLINE Kindly review it.
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Search24 (talk • contribs) 14:48, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello, members of the Vandalism Studies Project! As some of us are quite new with the Vandalism Studies project, it would make sense for us to re-read some of the past studies, as well as studies outside the project. Please do so if you have a chance, just so we can get into the groove of things. We're planning on attempting to salvage the Obama study (or possibly simply convert it to a new Romney study), as well as hopefully begin our third study this November. If you have any ideas for Study 3, please suggest them! If you have any questions please post them on the project talk page. Thanks, and happy editing - we can't wait to begin working on the project! --Dan653 (talk) and Theopolisme :)
11:30, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
If you would like to stop receiving Vandalism Studies newsletters, please remove your name from the member list.
Uh whats an admin. U admin? Can i be an admin? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArchaicMatters (talk • contribs) 20:00, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:08, 28 August 2012 (UTC)