Thank you for your call. A customer service advisor will be with you momentarily. |
The Resilient Barnstar | |
"The Resilient Barnstar is awarded to any editor who learns and improves from criticisms, never letting mistakes impede their growth as an editor."
For your understanding after recent criticism. Keep going! Faizan (talk) 19:03, 2 September 2015 (UTC) |
Faizan (talk) 16:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
I invite you to Talk:Non-denominational Muslim where a discussion about the speedy delelition of the article has been started. Your point of view will be much appreciated! Septate (talk) 15:32, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Hadith and Criticism of Hadith (Authenticity Category)". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 28 November 2015.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 04:34, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello.I am afraid that I will not be able to help with your request as I am no expert in Islamic theology and therefore have no way to confirm the reliability of the sources.--Catlemur (talk) 18:05, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
I'm completely unfamiliar with the hadith; I know what they are, but that's it. As such, I don't think my input would be helpful. I skimmed the discussion and saw nothing obviously untoward (it appears to be just the content dispute that you described, not something with someone misusing sources or doing other fundamentally problematic stuff), and the only obvious problem with the articles (aside from minor stuff, like punctuation and slightly odd wording) is that big chunks of Criticism of Hadith are present in Hadith, which is normally not a good idea because when we've chopped out a chunk of an article for it to stand separately, the remaining part in the main article should be a summary, not merely reproducing a part of the new article and largely ignoring the rest. Nyttend (talk) 21:36, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, got your message - there is one (enormous) problem: I know next to nothing about the subject. If it was solely a grammar or copy edit problem, then I could possibly help. Sorry I can't be of more assistance to you, I hope you can reach an agreeable solution. Best regards Denisarona (talk) 15:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning Hadith and Criticism of Hadith (Authenticity Category), in which you were listed as a party, has been accepted by the Mediation Committee. The case will be assigned to an active mediator within two weeks, and mediation proceedings should begin shortly thereafter. Proceedings will begin at the case information page, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Hadith and Criticism of Hadith (Authenticity Category), so please add this to your watchlist. Formal mediation is governed by the Mediation Committee and its Policy. The Policy, and especially the first two sections of the "Mediation" section, should be read if you have never participated in formal mediation. For a short guide to accepted cases, see the "Accepted requests" section of the Guide to formal mediation. You may also want to familiarise yourself with the internal Procedures of the Committee.
As mediation proceedings begin, be aware that formal mediation can only be successful if every participant approaches discussion in a professional and civil way, and is completely prepared to compromise. Please contact the Committee if anything is unclear.
For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:55, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Sorry to bother, I think the Islam article has a lot of poor editing put in by anyone with an axe to grind and needs a lot of cleaning up. I am trying to do that but am in a little trouble by editors who get scared by the red negative sign of the history page showing net negative reduction in the article. If you do not mind, could we get your input on the talk page since you seem to be involved with the article before? Sodicadl (talk) 18:02, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Code16 reported by User:FreeatlastChitchat (Result: ). Thank you. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:32, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Muhammad selling slaves". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 6 February 2016.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 03:37, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning Muhammad selling slaves, in which you were listed as a party, has been accepted by the Mediation Committee. The case will be assigned to an active mediator within two weeks, and mediation proceedings should begin shortly thereafter. Proceedings will begin at the case information page, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Muhammad selling slaves, so please add this to your watchlist. Formal mediation is governed by the Mediation Committee and its Policy. The Policy, and especially the first two sections of the "Mediation" section, should be read if you have never participated in formal mediation. For a short guide to accepted cases, see the "Accepted requests" section of the Guide to formal mediation. You may also want to familiarise yourself with the internal Procedures of the Committee.
As mediation proceedings begin, be aware that formal mediation can only be successful if every participant approaches discussion in a professional and civil way, and is completely prepared to compromise. Please contact the Committee if anything is unclear.
For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 04:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
The request for formal mediation concerning Muhammad selling slaves, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 20:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
I would appreciate your comment here.--Victor Chmara (talk) 08:53, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello Code16, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Kalabagh Dam has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:34, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
You are invited to participate at the deletion nominations for India and state-sponsored terrorism and 2016 Indian military raid in Pakistan-administered Kashmir. Thanks. Filpro (talk) 17:45, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Code16. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
As per your request, Ive completed the assessment of the article Ideas of Ghulam Ahmed Pervez, and rated it. -AsceticRosé 01:08, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Code16. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Code16. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Code16. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Code16. Following your email request, I have created the subpage User:Code16/Mridu Rai with the content of the deleted article. Note that this article had been deleted on January 24, 2018 by User:Anthony Bradbury for the following reason: G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (Mfarazbaig) in violation of ban or block. This material can serve as the basis of a new article that you can create if you think it is appropriate. Olivier (talk) 07:22, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text ((unblock|Your reason here ~~~~)) below. — Berean Hunter (talk) 08:51, 17 February 2019 (UTC) |
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. This user conspired with others in a scheme to frame editors for sockpuppetry. The nationalistic edit warring has gotten out of hand and the banhammer is going to start falling more readily on POV warriors and schemers.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 08:55, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Code16 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
It's impossible to deal with hypotheticals and private evidence. Please appeal to Arbcom. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:03, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.