This is my talk page. Remember to sign your comments with four tildes. EnabledDanger 01:13, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And your policy based argument is...? Oh wait, that's right, you didn't make one. You just want it kept because you like it. Well, guess what. That ain't a valid reason. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 21:15, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes Wikipedia:Inherent notability is the obvious choice. If I had 20-year-old copies of The TV Guide or Time Magazine laying around, I'm sure I would find this episode discussed. Just because I can't produce them doesn't mean the subject hasn't been written about. Peace out.EnabledDanger (talk) 21:21, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's no point in adding notability tags to articles that have already been nominated for AfD, since the purpose of an AfD is to establish notability. I'm not sure what criteria you're using. For example, the notability of Peter McWilliams‎ seems fairly clear.   Will Beback  talk  00:20, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. EnabledDanger (talk) 00:32, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]