Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. Please see Wikipedia:Introduction and Wikipedia:User page for more information. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask on the WP: Help Desk, or ask your question and then place ((helpme))
before the question on this page. Again, welcome!--GoShow (...............) 03:05, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome and pages! EscapeX (talk) 05:51, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
You moved an article back to your preferred name even after your previous move was reverted. In the future, a disputed article move must be put forward by following the instructions at WP:Requested move. Thank you.
Please feel free to offer your opinion at Talk:Bad_World_Tour#Requested_move. Binksternet (talk) 21:13, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
I want to apologize, because I little bit messed up your edits in Victory tour article. Finally I put all your edits back, because they are reasonable and make article better.
Only one thing remains: please do not change the Bad tour link on that page to Unity tour link, because Victory tour is more closely connected to Michael career highlights, not to his brothers careers. Victory tour could have just as well been Michael solo tour in 1984.
Thank you! Lassoboy (talk) 05:19, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bad (tour). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 23:44, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United We Stand: What More Can I Give, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sex Machine, Living in America and Feel Good (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of songs recorded by Michael Jackson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aaron Hall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
You've been asked before, but where is your source for the song "Best of Joy"? If you cannot back up your claim then it's just heresay and will be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.175.37.54 (talk) 01:26, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Bad 25. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 00:56, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on This Is It (concerts). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 18:44, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Just so it's all in one place - here are the reasons why you are wrong to continue to revert in the three articles.
Wikipedia is built upon consensus, not an individual's personal preference (no matter how knowledgeable they are). Feel free to contend these points in a logical way, but simply pressing undo is not the way to do it. There must be 6 or 7 people undoing your edits. Please take the hint and don't waste any more of anybody's time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.175.37.54 (talk) 23:01, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
If you have any other issues or come up with ideas then say them. EscapeX (talk) 09:15, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I thought I'd bring to your attention a couple of WP policies/guidelines, namely WP:OVERCAT which does suggest that Michael Jackson should not be linked every time his name is mentioned, and WP:3RR which says the continual undoing of some else's work is edit warring and can get you banned/blocked from editing WP. I suggest you start a discussion on the talkpage and see if you can reach a consensus with other editors. I am posting this here because of the overlink issue and have no firm opinion in respect of other matters, or who is right and who is wrong. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 10:40, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:13, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bad 25. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 19:49, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 22:22, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Could you pls read over WP:OVERLINK.Moxy (talk) 20:06, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
BOTH of you need to stop editing the page right now!!! I need to make clear that you were blocked for Wikipedia:Edit warring - not for the content of the edits. Both you and the IP need to talk over edit-waring - we have basic conduct expectations pls see Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. If you guys cant resolve the problem on your own get help see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution requests. Moxy (talk) 08:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ‑Scottywong| chat _ 17:13, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Today you made an edit to this article which essentially introduced the word "duet" around 45 times. Almost all of the songs cannot be described as a duet, which crucially is for two singers performing together. This is usually when they both sing parts of the song, often interspersed with each other so that it is as if they are singing to each other. The word is not used for choirs, or when a 10-second rap is added to the end of a song. Wrecks-N-Effect is a rap group, A Brand New Day (The Wiz song) is a full-cast recording, for the song by 3T, the word featuring is better, and USA for Africa and Artists for Haiti were both large-scale collaborations. We must use the right word, and each song is different.
This is very similar to your insistence on using the word "tour" for the This Is It (concerts), which stayed in London. These are English terms which have specific meanings. This can be found on Wikipedia, but also in any dictionary. Accurate language is important, and doing an automatic find/replace operation to make everything look the same is not something you should be edit-warring over. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.175.37.54 (talk) 13:04, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of songs recorded by Michael Jackson. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Please reach consensus on the talk page rather than edit warring in article space. Binksternet (talk) 13:10, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
You know, you've been edit warring over this issue since August 2012 when I first warned you. Slow motion edit warring is still edit warring. The name of the tour is "Bad", reflected by the majority of sources shown at Talk:Bad_(tour)#Requested_move_2012, by the general consensus arrived at by discussion there, and by the second move request which you started, but which closed with strong consensus against your preferred naming: Talk:Bad_(tour)#Requested_move_2.
Please respect article consensus or start another move request, this time with convincing arguments. Binksternet (talk) 03:44, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:44, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 01:20, 23 April 2013 (UTC)EscapeX (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Reconsider this block situation. I know I was block for the edit war which I tried to stop again and again. Please understand that my edits aren't not to vandalize an article but to help improve it. I do not edit an article to disrupt it. My intention is always is to improve an article. I'm for one am tired of always having to deal with the disruptive edits of the IP user. I compromised with him but not even that was enough. For instance, when I created the page, the word "featuring" was used (here's the page before the IP user edited it: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_songs_recorded_by_Michael_Jackson&oldid=529802021) but he didn't like the word "featuring" so we got into an edit war over it until I gave in and removed the word "featuring" completely from the article. (here's the page after the word "featuring" was removed: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_songs_recorded_by_Michael_Jackson&oldid=538836683) After a few more edit wars, I redirected the page to end the edit war. (here's the page when I redirected it: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_songs_recorded_by_Michael_Jackson&oldid=551584929) I would rather redirect the article that I created than have this edit war to continue. I will stop this edit war and prevent them from happening again. I'm here in Wikipedia to help improve articles. EscapeX (talk) 02:52, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not demonstrate how you will stop the behavior that led to your block. However, you may wish to take up our Standard Offer: wait 6 months (i.e. until October 23), and then come back and request unblocking, stating clearly how you plan to edit constructively. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:42, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of songs recorded by Michael Jackson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Rogers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 23 April 2013 (UTC)