This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
thanks for previously removing the vandalism from the UM page. The criticism section has been repeatedly deleted for maybe a dozen times now, and we have been having to just keep putting it back up. Finally, someone prtotected it- but with the vandalsim up (and the criticism down). If you could add your input on the discussion section it would be helpful. Thanks, jcdpi
Thanks for fixing my typo on apples and oranges.
I took a look at your blog, and I thought you'd like seeing this. I don't know how much you've been following the Padilla mess in recent months, but it brought a big smile to my face to see the 4th circuit spanking the Bush administration for its dishonesty. The whole thing is wonderful, but here's one of my favorite excerpt from the decision:
It looks like no one ever officially welcomed you, so I thought I'd do it now. Let me know if you need anything.
Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
Here are a few links you might find helpful:
You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type ((helpme))
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
We're so glad you're here!
Dave (talk) 07:17, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
I just started this article. Several more paragraphs are coming. It's definitely not dictionary-material. — 0918BRIAN • 2006-01-11 18:02
Please do not make personal attacks on other contributors. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. Ukpcdaz 03:23, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
There is only one liar, and that is you, you are adding 1+1 and calculating 3. A typical schoolboy error, my friend.Ukpcdaz 03:33, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
For the record, this "personal attack" was pointing out that user ukpcdaz (and possibly other editors) lied about his/their identity(ies) in attempt to appear unbiased on an AfD vote. Fightindaman 03:36, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
(a) you have no reason to believe this, (b) you have no evidence of this (c) i am appauled you could suggest it (d) it is plain (but typical) ignorance, to disbelieve and not listen to someone when they are they are telling you something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ukpcdaz (talk • contribs)
I proved evidence on the AfD page. Fightindaman 03:42, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
All you proved was your rudeness, and your inability to listen. If everyone in the world were as rude as you have been, the world would need bush to kill us all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ukpcdaz (talk • contribs)
Yes the Green Day and Neo Nazism page was a complete and absolute hoax. It was actually made to be interpreted more as a joke, but I understand that's not what you Wikipedia people are interested in. So be it though I'll stop. ---MonkeyCMonkeyDo 02:09, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Are you telling me a mobile phone is worthy of a 2-page long article? It's not even a particularly sophisticated or popular phone. It retails for £99 in the UK (about $150). The phone here is a mid-to-low budget phone. My putting the article up for deletion was not in bad spirit, I honestly don't see why this particular phone deserved such attention, when in a few months time, nobody will remember, or care to remember, anything about it. It's replacement alredy exists! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Helzagood (talk • contribs)
Please revert Tony Sidaway then, and perhaps expand the article to mention the tour, citing reliable sources. See the new Wikipedia:Proposed deletion experiment for information on what went on to the article. Thanks for your note. --Perfecto 04:31, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Hi sorry i am new at this. I noticed you put a warning on my post. How do I go about resolving it? juejuebie
Okay I will ask Brokensegue about it then. Thank you. juejuebie
Hello Fightindaman, I switched the tag on this article to WP:PROD. Sorry to step on your toes, but I think it has less WP:BITE. The crime sounds horrible! Any questions, please contact me on my talk. regards, --FloNight 02:31, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
I agree that the way I left it sounds awkward- maybe we can polish it. but it is more accurate than what you changed it to. the word fuck doesn't literally refer to sex. the speaker does so when he uses the word fuck. yameen? skizznologic3.1 22:23, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
"while the word fuck used literally, refers to
as opposed to
"while the word fuck, used literally, refers to
skizznologic3.1 23:07, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, sorry, sorry! I switched the tag without checking the first edit. You can switch it back if you like. FloNight talk 02:44, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
[copied from the page of User:Jmabel]
Since you are an admin, could you please go over to this page. I've listed it for speedy deletion, but in the meantime it's being used to list a whole host of personal attacks by various anon users. I'd appreciate if you could either fulfill the speedy delete, or at least semi-protect it if it's not actually speedy-able. Thanks. Fightindaman 03:54, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
[end copied material]
thank you for editing my first article "Matt Serra" i appreciate the help and if you could look at it again i would be greatful
Hey, I wrote a stub at the The Great News Network temp page. Was just curious what you thought of it.
Thanks. Yeah, I know. I am just a poor little new admin and am not too sure if I would be overstepping my authority to block the editor involved. So I have asked for advice at a few different places and am waiting to hear back before I do anything else. --Martyman-(talk) 03:23, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
What was the reason for reverting my edit on AFD/sarcasma? It's well established policy that anonymous users are not allowed to participate in votes. By moving their comments to a seperate section, without deleting them, the admin can review them if necessary, but they will not clutter up the vote. Furthermore, deleting my personal comments on the AfD is entirely unacceptable. ⇒ SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 09:23, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
From the Wikipedia:Proposed deletion page "...If someone removes Template:Prod from an article for whatever reason, don't place it back. If the template was removed and replaced, the article will not be deleted. If you still believe the article needs to be deleted, list it on AfD." Please do not replace the template but you may want to list it as either a speedy or a AfD. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 18:52, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Hi thanks for readding the prod tag to "the game" but we can only add them once, we have to open a AfD after a PROD is removed. Mike (T C) 02:40, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Hey, sorry about an edit made to straight edge under my user name yesterday. It was made by my friend—not me. RJN 22:23, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
I didn't think that the deletion case had been persuasively enough to justify deleting below the commonly-used threshold of two-thirds support to delete. Further, Kappa's brief point it actually very true and, whilst I rejected the author's argument in my closure statement, I know from experience that at least several similar articles have indeed been kept (usually as no consensus) in AfD. -Splashtalk 00:39, 10 March 2006 (UTC) (PS I'd prefer a reply on my talk page as I am not looking at my watchlist whilst closing AfDs.)
hey, I go to this school - I understand why you might see the contribution in the trivia section about fights as unverifiable but I assure you historically that is where fights always happen (of the 2 major fights to date this year both of them were during the F-6 period and both of them were on monkey hill) telling a kid you'll see him F-6 is the Salesianum way of challenging him to a fight. —This unsigned comment is by Schrandit (talk • contribs) .
Thank you for the note, I was working on multiple CFD's and put the wrong header on that one. I've ammened to no consensus but recomend renaming. Please see Category talk:Fuck for more info. — xaosflux Talk 05:34, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Hi, i noticed that you added back the line about "Many fans find this decision hypocritical", was there a survey, is there anything that can back that statement up?Jacknife737 00:45, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed you put a ((copyvio)) on Kelly Cramer. Since it was a new article, it can be requested for a speedy deletion in which case the content can stay. I switched it to ((db-copyvio)). I hope you don't mind. Prolog 01:25, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Why u request a delete on my page?
And you call yourself an Anarchist? Yeah, right. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Crud3w4re (talk • contribs) .
Yeah. So don't proclaim to be an anarchist when you're not. Crud3w4re 04:29, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
I just want to go over how you think you're an anarchist. I was told by an Admin that I can delete it in a month since it would be old anyway. Crud3w4re 04:52, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
OK. No hard feelings? I just never heard of you before, so I thought I was being targeted for something. I'll keep it there for now, but I hope to one day do some "spring cleaning". Crud3w4re 06:58, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
hey there...whatever happened to the SE template you listed on the talk page? anyway, i'm interested, if'n you still have it.
thanks! --HatchetFaceBuick 17:25, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
sXe | This user is straight edge. |
Fightindaman 14:52, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:North_America_Sucks.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 19:10, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Just Wanted To Say Hey. Casey19 20:23, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. I've had this on my list for a while but couldnt figure out how to do it. DGG (talk) 05:29, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:For Blood and Empire cover.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Purgatory cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:34, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Insurepink, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add ((hangon))
on the top of Insurepink and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 17:08, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Did you realize that you tagged this article I just created approximately one minute after I saved the first line? Why in the world did you do this so quickly when I didn't even have a chance to add any more information?BWH76 (talk) 17:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |