Archives

Archive 1

1998 Andhra Pradesh cyclone, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 11:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Storm Poly, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Taxila (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Flux55. Thank you for your work on Taxila (disambiguation). Aviram7, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Aviram7)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:18, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Citation Barnstar
	Thanks for adding some sources to various list articles! Keep up the good work. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yep, no idea really how to cite it because it happens to be work that I am doling in greyhound race tracking. I posted a bit more here (https://www.quora.com/How-fast-can-a-Greyhound-run-in-MPH/answer/Misha-Charrett), but at some stage I will add it formally somewhere. In short, I might be the only one on the planet that can give a verified speed (I have one two 2 decimal places in m/s)

Reference to the system here - https://www.thedogs.com.au/news/2021-03-15/grnsw-launch-world-leading-race-data I am the software developer that has developed and maintained the database so I have access to all the raw data

I find it amusing that now I have actual real data, everything on the web is just plain wrong ;-)

Mishac67 (talk) 10:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

BTW, this is my website (https://www.mcssolutions.com.au/), this is my client (http://brook.com.au/), and here is a link to the API I developed (https://api.brook.com.au/) - needs an API key though. Eventually will put something public to confirm Mishac67 (talk) 10:28, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oof. That's obviously a point-of-interest problem (see WP:COI), so you can't really add that data... ''Flux55'' (talk) 12:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes and no. This will be actual calculated verifiable data that is used by Racing NSW, Victoria, South Australia etc - all the State-based racing bodies that run greyhound racing in Australia. The hardware was "commissioned" for its initial use by these official bodies. So this isn't opinion, like the current greyhound maximum speeds, which have no actual factual reference behind it. This is measured data (not an opinion). My main interest here is correcting the obviously incorrect values quoted everywhere. Any thoughts? Because the max speed quoted in the Wikipedia page is demonstrably wrong (by some margin). Maybe I can get this data out onto the Greyhound Racing NSW web site? Mishac67 (talk) 12:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oof again. You stated that you were "commissioned" for this data, which falls under WP:PAID and you haven't enclosed that yet. So double no. ''Flux55'' (talk) 13:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Again, not quite. I develop the code that processes the data, which will be used by official racing bodies. Much like sporting game stats produced by a third party are used by the sporting bodies. Looks like it might just be easiest to get the data published on the official site (which won't have any reference to me). I totally understand the need to have verifiable data, but this was just an observation by me that all the quoted values on the internet are wrong. I don't really care, because I just deal in data, but it's a little comical that the "agreed" values currently are just plain wrong Mishac67 (talk) 13:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This has been an interesting exercise (as part of my work) to prove something that is "common knowledge" to be in fact, just plain wrong Mishac67 (talk) 12:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I changed the page to use only official sources, so got an update without resorting to using my data for now. You can tidy up the links and how they are used (I'm not good at references), but the official sectional times and the link to how long each sectional is will confirm my calculations Mishac67 (talk) 14:23, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Timeline of the 1991 Atlantic hurricane season. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:33, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ali Smith (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 15:36, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Timeline of the 1991 Atlantic hurricane season. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:39, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023–24 Australian region cyclone season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Innisfail.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Timeline of the 1991 Atlantic hurricane season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]