Aviram7 is currently experiencing mental health issues, which may affect his Wikipedia editing in various ways. He may have difficulty with: altered perception when making editorial judgements, determining consensus, or reading Wikipedia discussions addressed to him; reduced availability on Wikipedia during times when he experiences issues; limited capacity to respond to other Wikipedians via talk page or email messages in a timely fashion, to participate in conflict resolution, or to complete his usual workload of Wikipedia tasks. Thank you for your understanding.

Pending changes backlog
(review log)

High backlog

[view • purge • update]

---

13 pages according to DatBot 14:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC Backlog

3-month backlog at AFC.
There are currently 2,610 pending submissions.
[view • purge • update]

---

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

Aviram7 is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon.

New Discussion Start From Here

please write massage from this link.

Hello and Namaskaar.

Hope you are well. And I am also fine.

I saw that you have done a wonderful job on Wikimedia. And I am very impressed with your work.

I request you, if you have any group/community on Wikipedia then please include me in it. I want to learn by connecting with you. Thanks you. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 10:39, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Youknowwhoistheman: Hello there! I'm doing good! and you are also fine... That's great!. okay.. I like to work on enwik sometimes hiwiki, metawiki.. etc.. I'd like to happy when you learning (something) from me on english Wikipedia. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 10:53, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aviram7- I would be very happy, please guide me. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 16:00, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Youknowwhoistheman How I guide to you?.🤔 ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For over 100 article reviews during 2023. Well done! Keep up the good work and thank you! Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr vulpes: Hi, Thank you.. for this barnaster. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 04:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In Talk:Loni#Requested_move_26_December_2023, I don't see a substantive proof that we observed the policy described at WP:DETCON. I rebutted the other arguments made at length and with supplemental information; nobody made any effort to further discuss this. There is no real consensus there if there's no actual discussion. Please relist it instead.

Note also that this is one in a line of similar discussions that might require a more systematic solution, cf. Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Request for comment. --Joy (talk) 14:18, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Joy: Hi, I think if discussion was closed before 7 days ago and I moved the page suggested by the requester, so, now they really need to relist them?😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 14:30, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose it's fair to say it's too late at this point. Next time then. --Joy (talk) 16:55, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Joy: Yes! You have reached this point too late as it has been too many days since the discussion ended. If I have made any mistake regarding that topic or discussion, I apologize to you.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk)

• Pinkchiken (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Biodiversity Impact Credit (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello Aviram7, thank you very much for looking at our draft so soon. Your wrote that "some sections are seems to be unsourced". Indeed, I see that we did not include any sources or web links in the sections

• Interpretation
• Targeting tree extinction risk
• Conservation Partnerships
• Scalability and Market Adoption

Would you expect a proper reference (using <ref></ref> or [ ]) in each section or are inline links (using [[ | ]]) fine as well?

Pinkchiken (talk) 09:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pinkchiken: Hi,Please see your draft carefully from bottom to top you do not adding source in bottom of few section, please fill reference on it, you added more reference in few section, I suggest to you please remove few reference from them and add reference in last few unsourced section of in your draft.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 11:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NAMASKAR AND RAM RAM AVIRAM7 , I AM FROM UTTRAKHAND I CREATED A DRAFT SHITLAKHET VILLAGE , YOU ADDED A COMMENT ON MY DRAFT TO ADD AN IMAGE OF THE PLACE I DID IT . PLEASE REVIEW IT AGAIN .

YOUR SINCERELY

WHATIF222 Whatif222 (talk) 13:52, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Whatif222: Jai Sitaram-Jai Bajrangbali, Thank you for reaching out on my talkpage, I've fixed map releated issue, I think if you add more information on you're draft, so, It easily to evulate the subject's notability, and I see the draft is seem to me very short article releated to a tourism or place, if you add this topics releated more information like, tourism, location, geography of this place, then, I'd to happy accepted this draft. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Whatif222:, I've reconsider your request and I've decided to accepted you're draft and I hope you adding more as I suggest to you on first reply.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:26, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks mr Aviram7 sir I will surely add more details to the draft time by time. Whatif222 (talk) 17:11, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for acting as closer in this discussion. I'm a bit puzzled, however, by your assessment of "no consensus." Two editors opposed the move, while none other than OP were in favour. Per WP:THREEOUTCOMES, this would appear to be a "Not moved" close. 162 etc. (talk) 17:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@162 etc.: Hi, Sorry for late reply, As far as there was no consensus in that performance request move request, the users participating in that discussion were only opposed,then I closed this request as no consensus, if I maked any fault during closed this discussion,so, I apologize to you about that.😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I don't understand. Why did you choose "no consensus" when there was no support at all for the proposed title? Such a discussion would appear to be a consensus for "Not moved". 162 etc. (talk) 16:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing my draft! However, I have a question? In your message, you stated that the article would be Stub-class. However, when I look in the article's talk page, it's rated B-class. Did you want to rate it Stub-class or B-class?

''Flux55'' (talk) 16:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Flux55: Hello,Thank you for reaching out on my usertalkpage, I've given stub class rating during you're draft acceptances, but when I going to adding importance rating on you're draft via rater tool, then I saw rater tool is predicted you're draft is B-class rated , so, I've changed you're draft rating according to rater tool. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for clarifying! ''Flux55'' (talk) 16:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]