Welcome!
Hello, Fmveblen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place ((help me))
before the question. Again, welcome!
Blue Rasberry (talk) 23:48, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Also, I may come across some references that might be helpful to you in my research process. If so I will pass those along to you.
Virginiawhite09 (talk) 22:54, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.
Click here to be taken to the survey site.
The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!
Happy editing,
J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:28, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Message sent with Global message delivery.
Hi,
I was looking over your work on unpaid work on the feminist economics] page and it occurred to me that there might be enough there for you to make a new unpaid work page. As far as I can tell this page does not yet exist on wikipedia and I think it might be a good overall contribution to wikipedia. I understand if you do not want to take this route, I just thought I might encourage you to do it since such a page is totally absent from wikipedia. If you do decide to do this, I think you could pretty much move what is currently on the feminist economics page to a new page, and then simply write a short summary on the feminist economics page and then provide a main link to your new page.
I think your work looks good though!
Virginiawhite09 (talk) 17:40, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
I did not write the whole article. My contribution ends with the theoretical perspectives. So I did not write the section "Women's attitude and the environment" or anything following that.
User:alainas —Preceding undated comment added 17:25, 23 April 2012 (UTC).
-”Domestic work an activity done” I think you missed a verb in there.
-”Subsistence work is work done in order to meet base needs, such as collecting water, which do not have any market values assigned to them” This sentence is a bit fragmented. Maybe you could pull it together by saying “...in order to meet base needs. Subsistence tasks, such as collecting water, do not have...”
-”Feminist economists have criticized this system for this exclusion,” This is a small detail, but I think it is more fluid to say “..have criticized the system for this exclusion” to avoid repetition without losing specificity.
-The headings for accurate information, comparability, and complexity seem out of place because they are considerably smaller than other headings.
Overall, very good! Good sourcing, and logical progression of content.
Corinthiandiosa (talk) 01:52, 25 April 2012 (UTC)Corinthiandiosa