Welcome!

Hello, Glickmam, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  Will (Talk - contribs) 07:58, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Tanaats 05:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding irrelevant information to the Kids Incorporated page. The page is NOT a "where are they now?" for the creative team, and their future credits have absolutely no relevance to their involvement on the show. If you insist on cluttering the page with irrelevant trivia, I or another editor will be there to immediately revert it. Please help the page instead of bringing it down. Thanks. DanielEng 14:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I did the same thing for the Andy Griffith Show page, and you didn't raise a fuss!!!! So why are you raising a fuss here?!!!! Glickmam 15:13, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ditto to the M*A*S*H page. don't be such an arse, no one thinks it's funny but you. Bouncehoper 04:33, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you talking to me or him? Glickmam 04:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You. duh. otherwise i'd be at HIS user talk page. Bouncehoper 02:48, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently recreated or reposted material which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. --Crossmr 16:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That material was removed from the article for a reason. There was a discussion and it was considered inappropriate. Please don't re-add it. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 02:55, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? I don't see any discussion. Glickmam 03:21, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm.... you could click the "discussion" link at the top of the page, and note it also has a link to a featured article review. And you can look in the edit summaries of the article. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 03:30, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1. Please summarize your changes in the Edit summary field below the main editing window. For policy, see Wikipedia:Edit_summary. Of the 674 edits you've made, you have never once summarized your changes. This is extraordinarily unhelpful to other editors.
2. Since most of your edits seem to be uncontroversial, please check the option in your Special:Preferences Editing tab to Mark all edits minor by default. Having all your edits marked major by default forces unnecessary review.

Thanks. --Lexein 01:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't revert to a format that goes against the WikiProject. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 17:45, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not post false information that you don't have any backing for. Wikipedia is not a place for you to post your thoughts and wishes.

Who are you and what are you talking about? Glickmam 22:39, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not change the article as you have twice already. The references are incorrect, hosts are not presenters in American television and announcers are not narrators. Nicholasm79 (talk) 18:26, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, I've done the same thing for "The People's Court" and noone else has complained, so why can't I do it for "Tic-Tac-Dough." The words are the same, they're just under a different name. Glickmam (talk) 03:20, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • But game shows do NOT have presenters. They are CALLED hosts. Game shows have announcers. They are not CALLED narrators. I don't see what basis you have for changing the information. Comparing this show to The People's Court is like comparing apples and oranges, it's not consistent. Nicholasm79 (talk) 04:18, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Because, as has already been stated, that isn't what they're called. I have been in the online game show community for nearly ten years, and not a single time have I ever heard the host of an American game show referred to as a "presenter" or the announcer of an American game show referred to as a "narrator." The terms you are using are simply wrong. -TPIRFanSteve (talk) 04:19, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
Can you tell me why you downgraded Ralph Edwards as the top billed executive producer? It was Edwards who personally hired Judge Wapner, and the current name of the company is "Ralph Edwards-Stu Billett Productions", both of which call for Edwards to get top billing.

Also, why did you remove Stu Billet from second billing as-broadcast creator? Masterson's idea was simply to put cameras in real courtrooms, which turned out to not be legal at the time, and did not sell. Years later, Billet was the creator of the simulated-courtroom binding arbitration show which became an enormous industry success as-broadcast. (Please reply here if desired) Milo 05:11, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I explained in my edit, the information I removed from the infobox was given in the article, and there was too much information in the box. It's very difficult to read and to pick out data with everything included in it. JTRH (talk) 10:57, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should understand that King World took over distribution duties for all Griffin series starting with The Merv Griffin Show in September 1983 because KW distributed the nighttime version of Wheel of Fortune and the 1983 pilot of Jeopardy!. Plus, the production company was known as Merv Griffin Productions. The logo may have said A Griffin Production, but the company was still known as Merv Griffin Productions until 1984. King Shadeed 1:46, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Please stop making unsourced edits. If you are going to change something you need to list a source in the edit using the wp:citeweb template. Sottolacqua (talk) 06:22, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please let me know why you reverted my edit to the Larry Kane article? Doing so reinserted an incomplete sentence and removed the Persondata. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 04:20, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to The Joker's Wild. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sottolacqua (talk) 16:56, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Friday night death slot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friday night death slot until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --George Ho (talk) 09:16, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. In addition to this, I would like to inform you that your changes to SpongeBob SquarePants was reverted because you have removed a content leaving no explanation. Thanks again. Mediran (t • c) 09:33, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I saw you added unsourced production companies to The Karate Kid (2010 film). There is consensus in this discussion that production companies require sources to explicitly label them. This is to reduce the amount of original research involved in identifying them. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WWE is traded on NASDAQ Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 23:50, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Again it is traded on NASDAQ per their site listing for it here, this is the second time I have given you the direct link to it. Stop removing it. I have also started a discussion about this on the articles talk page here. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 23:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Glickmam. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Glickmam. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]