This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I would have commented there, but it was closed. Leaving comments like facpalming me are not needed or wanted. They are just trolling an already irritating situation. If you don't like me or my onctributions I don't really care. Keep the stupid comments to yourself. The fact remains, I spent hours of my time making changes to the code only so my request to admins gets ignored after several days showing a complete disrespect for my time. I shouldn't have to ask for permission to implement the change and then have it done by someone who doesn't even understand the changes being made because they are "trusted". Its one of the fundamental problems with this site. Kumioko (talk) 13:56, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for backing me up on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shady Blaze but I respectfully disagree with your logic when you said "GNG is the minimum, however because there's claims for music notability WP:MUSICBIO applies."
It's my understanding that GNG is the criteria for notability, but not all topics that meet notability standards should have articles (WP:ONEEVENT is one example of notable topics that don't get stand-alone articles). It's also my understanding that the specialized notability criteria are "shortcuts" that exist because almost any topic satisfying one of the specialized notability topics will meet GNG if only someone would dig hard enough to find references. For example, a 1930s Major League baseball player in the AL or NL is presumed to meet GNG and there is little doubt that someone with access to every newspaper from that era would be able to find significant coverage from sources independent of the subject, so we will not flag such an person's biographical article as "non-notable" even if the only reference is a one-liner from the MLB web site giving his official career statistics. Only after a diligent search through contemporary newspapers and other media that came up dry or after demonstrating that there are enough 1930s-era MLB players with similar career statistics that are not notable would it be reasonable to flag such an article as "non-notable." In the latter case, the special notability guideline would need to be amended as it would no longer be supported by facts.
I contend that there are musicians who fail to meet WP:MUSIC but who, for whatever reason, meet WP:GNG. Whether they deserve their own articles or not depends on disqualifying criteria, such as WP:ONEEVENT. Besides the lack of reliable sources, one of the major reasons I declined Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shady Blaze was that his only real claim to fame was a single album, and that was too tenuous to support even an article on that album (although I admit a weak case could be made for an album article).
By the way, please see Special:Contributions/114.145.9.69, where this same editor undid some notability tags I applied to related topics. I plan on re-examining those topics later and if I still can't find notability even after using search engines, I will re-apply the tags and open discussions. If you are interested in musical topics and have the time, I would welcome another person's thorough examination of the notability of Main Attrakionz and Chance the Rapper. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 15:38, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
"A topic is presumed to merit an article if it meets the general notability guideline below, and is not excluded under the What Wikipedia is not policy. / A topic is also presumed notable if it meets the criteria outlined in a subject-specific guideline listed in the box on the right."
Hi Hasteur. Is that an ancient god? You seem to have un-patrolled a page I patrolled as reviewed at Ride and Tie for some reason, the reason being I'm the page creator. I can assure you I never created that article. I never even knew such a thing existed until I saw the article. I think I did correct something on the page. It could have been that you seen. scope_creep (talk) 21:02, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
QuantifiedElf (talk) 20:45, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi Hasteur
If you have a chance could you review http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Josef_Kote ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeCorbu1987 (talk • contribs) 17:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Once these questions get answered, I'll make my final determination about retirement.
MMA SPA trying to reverse a decision based in policy
|
---|
You were already both quoted and linked to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Archive_top, which gives clear instructions for use. If you continue to keep abusing this, I'm sure wiki has the appropriate mechanisms for dealing with persistent bad behavior. 75.172.12.104 (talk) 14:55, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Since you seem to be trying to delete evidence of the violation, here's a clear record:
I'll research this matter further of who to take this case to since you'll like re-violate again as done twice already but it's pretty clear this is in blatant disregard of the template's most basic rule. 75.172.12.104 (talk) 15:21, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
When I looked up the template you used, it's so clear that you used it illegally that there's no room for "interpretation". I guess we'll see how the wiki admins see this, because I reported you at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Hasteur_is_blatantly_violating_archive_template_rules_to_shut_down_discussion.2C_etc.. Thanks for the link to that board, btw. 75.172.12.104 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:47, 28 June 2013 (UTC) I hope you can abide by admin "decision" and stop closing down discussions. 75.172.12.104 (talk) 16:49, 28 June 2013 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
NYTimes Movies links suffer the same problem that IMDB suffers, "They may say the name, but there's little to no context as to the relevance of the credit". Please consider using a singular reference to the NY Times Movies for just the subject rather than giving the appearance of dazzling us with a great list of referencs (or better yet, use a named reference where you want to indicate a movie credit) to show the true distribution of references. Declined by Hasteur 7 seconds ago. Last edited by Hasteur 6 seconds ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be rejected again. |
Hi Hasteur, THANKS!! for your recommendations, we're working on your requested edits. One thing to note on the HealthyPet references, HealthyPet is the public communications arm of the American Animal Hospital Association, which accredits elite animal hospitals - AAHA is in fact the ONLY accrediting body for animal hospitals. We therefore must cite to AAHA to factually back up the information we are communicating. AAHA accredits individual departments as "Referral" a designation that is extremely rare in veterinary medicine. Therefore, in order to factually cite to each department that's accredited, we have to individually cite to HealthyPet (AAHA) in those distinct departments. I hope this makes sense, but HealthyPet/AAHA is a very strong and important reference to back up our factual statements. NOTE: fewer than 1% of the approximately 27,000 animal hospitals in North America have achieved our level of accreditation, which makes it a rare distinction worth communicating.
Thanks, MM2
ADDITIONAL: (hope this is the appropriate place for this, new to wikipedia). Definitely trying to make this a purely factual article based on objective sources for public consumption without conflicts of interest. And reaching for strong sources to that end. Is the article as written close? As a user of wikipedia, I'm glad this standard exists. Looking here to develop an ironclad, factual article that meets those standards for sure. I'll give it another pass, but any guidance would be absoultely welcome. I absolutely share your thoughts and trust that I can get the article over and above those standards in the end... THANKS!!!!
Hasteur, are you still mentoring this editor? I'm struck by the tone and the content of their questions at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Kelapstick 2; it seems to have very little to do with Kelapstick and more with their past experience with admins. Drmies (talk) 14:44, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello Hasteur,
Thank you for reviewing the wikipedia page I made for Titia Ex http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Titia_Ex_%282nd_copy%29
You declined the submission, while providing as reason that I used youtube links. I replaced all four youtube links, while also inserted sources at the "citation needed" locations where I was able to find the specific information via the internet.
Since the wiki page was declined three times (while I expected an approval this time around), should I submit it again (and get a fourth reviewer to look at it...) or will you review the page and accept it for wiki placement or explain on this talk page why it still isn't right?
Fredrick
Hello Hasteur, I'll try not to tip you into retirement with my semi-Noob questions!
First, thanks for giving up your time to review my entry. I've re-submitted it, but I'm contacting you here just so you know that I haven't overlooked one of the two directions you gave me. Those directions were:
1) That the entry just list the recent overall winner and not the "lesser" winners in the sub-categories. That's been done, thanks for the tip. 2) That the award be disambiguated from other Food Photographer of the Year Awards, since you felt there were others. I've had a good, honest look but I really couldn't find any. It would have been in my interest to find one as then I could just disambig it from mine - but I found nothing. I'm kinda stuck unless you can find the other award you mention - else I'm being tasked with disproving a negative. I thought maybe we could disambig it by calling it by the sponsors names, but that would look tacky - plus the sponsors change all the time. Can I ask you to reconsider on this point and let the title stand?
Best, Arnie
I will certainly find more citations, but to suggest that Ken Lanci "appears to be a non-notable person" is inaccurate.
Lanci is running for mayor of Cleveland vs. the incumbent. He is the only candidate to have qualified for the race. As well, Lanci has previously ran for office. All of this is cited in the article I created.
Additionally, Lanci is a well-known Cleveland-area businessman and philanthropist.
I will add citations in the next 24 hours.
In the meantime, please reconsider "non-notable person" status. This may be of interest to you: https://www.google.com/search?q=ken+lanci&oq=ken+lanci&aqs=chrome.0.57j59l2j60l2j62.1231j0&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Greetings sir,
I just want to ask about the comment you've left on my contribution : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Mineski
About the imgur problem, how can i make a hard copy of a magazine a reference for my article?
Hello, I am very surprised. Why is too difficult to add an articles' translation in Wikipedia English ? Why the wikipedia's admins have no respect about works from volunteers ? I am disgusted to have provided much work for nothing. I do not understand what is happening! This is a personality that has many awards in his profession. Why such contempt? http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farid_Dms_Debah (French Wikipedia) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Farid_Dms_Debah (My translation)
You are there to help volunteers or just to denigrate their work?
Hi there. I've noticed it's been a while since you've been active at DRN, and we could really use your help! DRN is going to undergo some changes soon, so it'd really be great if our backlog is cleared before the start of August and we have as many people on board to help with the changes (they include a move to subpages and the creation of a rotating "co-ordinator" role to help manage things day-to-day. Hope to see you soon! Steven Zhang Help resolve disputes! 11:32, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
...William 17:12, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi Hasteur. First, thanks for reviewing the article on Libertære Socialister: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Libertære Socialister
But I need some help now. My article has been declined submission 4 times now. The 3 first times the reviewers requested to add citations to secondary reliable sources - and I have done that 3 times now. I have practically added all mainstream media sources to be found and an academic report from Roskilde University, and now I'm in a situation where I really don't think that there are more to be found on this subject. You write that this article is on one hand "Still very heavily cited to the group's own writings" and on another hand "Over cited in using clusters of 3 references where one alone might work". There are 34 references - 7 of them are from the organizations own website and 6 of them are related to Anarkismo (the international network which Ls is a part of). Only one of these are related to a citation - the one where they describe themselves - the rest of them are simply references, so that the reader can check the informations given (link to their political platform, link to their rules, link to their publication and statements about their participation in the Anarkismo network. The rest of the references are not related to the organization.
It's a relatively small political organization, so as mentioned, I don't think that I will be able to find many more references in mainstream media (that would also make it more over cited). The only thing I could do is to remove references to the organizations own website (link to platform, rules, publication etc.), but I really don't see how this will make the article better. I could also remove links to secondary sources - but that would only make the next reviewer decline the submission because it will be too "heavily cited to the group's own writings". So I don't know what to do to have this article approved.
I'm an historian (specialized in the international labour movement) and I really think this article is properly covered with references - especially when you take the subject into account. So instead of adding more or removing references, I will ask you to help me. Where in this article (exactly what information) do you think need a better reference? I would like to know, so that it can finally be submitted.
I had an idéa about writing small articles on all the anarchist platformist groups around the world, but after this one I really don't think that I have the energy for it. And I must say that I find it hard to understand 4 declines of my article when I look at references in the articles about similar organizations: Alternative libertaire, Anarchist Federation (Britain and Ireland), Common Struggle, Federação Anarquista Gaúcha, Uruguayan Anarchist Federation, Zabalaza Anarchist Communist Front, Federation of Anarchist Communists
Please help me Hasteur :-)
Makhno partisan (talk) 13:00, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Makhno partisan (talk) 14:37, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear HasteurBot,
thank you for your message. I have been trying to get more references on my article in the internat'l wikipedia, on Prof. Holm-Hadulla ( Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rainer M. Holm-Hadulla), e.g. on his role in IPA, but I couldn't, so herewith I give up on that article and request it be deleted. Thank you in advance and best wishes Cvfriede (talk) 15:43, 9 August 2013 (UTC)cvfriede Aug 9 2013
PS: Is there some kind of reply function to messages people get from you? I could not find any.
See WP:HD, section "HasteurBot" — someone's talking to your bot like a person :-) I think that others have answered the question fully, so I'm here basically just to tell you to check it out if you want to have a smile. Nyttend (talk) 15:21, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your comment on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alexis Ríos Rovira. I follow WP:WPAFC but didn't know all of the details of the bot-management of the G13 cleanout.
There is one huge difference between a WP:G13-cleanout and a discussion-based deletion: G13's are eligible for a WP:REFUND, discussion-based deletions generally require a WP:Deletion review. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 18:14, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I will try to improve my submission on Professional Poker Player for your approval. Thanks. Vincent Michael Consolo — Preceding unsigned comment added by CosmoEmc2 (talk • contribs) 15:49, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sydney Urshan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason: Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Hasteur (talk) 13:56, 23 July 2013 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
|
Extended content
|
---|
Hey! It appears that when you have been submitting articles as "Pro forma submissions", you have been adding the template in such a way as to break the AFCH script. The way to fix it is to add two extra pipes (three total) in front of the "ts = " parameter. Cheers! Tazerdadog (talk) 22:56, 27 July 2013 (UTC) |
Extended content
| ||
---|---|---|
|
Extended content
|
---|
Hey, Hasteur, if you're done there could you close it (or drop me a note and I'll do it)? It's way beyond its normal life span had it been listed prior to the subpage experiment and would have been autoarchived already. Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 15:59, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
I'm on IRC now, and should be for the next few hours. Theopolisme (talk) 00:17, 3 August 2013 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
Dear Hasteur: I replaced the missing template on the above article, which the user had deleted. The template clearly had the original submitter's name in it. However, when you submitted it the submit template ended up with my name in it and the decline notice came to me instead of the actual article creator. Did you add my name manually, or did the submit button do it somehow? I have been adding a number of these, so it is important to know what went wrong. —Anne Delong (talk) 19:01, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
Hi there, For my article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Harneet_Singh you have given the review as null and rejected it. Kindly let me know about the improvements that it needed. ~~siddharth~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siddharthyit (talk • contribs) 05:26, 6 August 2013 (UTC) |
Extended content
| ||
---|---|---|
|
Extended content
| |||
---|---|---|---|
Copied to the Hall of Pride Hasteur (talk) 14:28, 6 August 2013 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Perm Tsar Cannon you gave a comment: All the sources in Russian make this difficult to verify. ... Please remedy with English Language sources or consider making this article on the Russian Wikipedia. That comment is contrary to established policy. According to WP:RS, as you surely know, sources in any language are sufficient. DGG ( talk ) 23:09, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
Recently the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard underwent some changes in how it operates. Part of the change involved a new list of volunteers with a bit of information about the people behind the names. You are listed as a volunteer at DRN currently, to update your profile is simple, just click here. Thanks, Cabe6403(Talk•Sign) 17:15, 7 August 2013 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
Hi, I am too stupid to figure out how to undelete the page you deleted yesterday. hockeystu2 Hockeystu2 (talk) 18:20, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
|
Hello Hasteur: I have a question about my recent rejection from a few minutes ago. I have made the article completely encyclopedic in tone. All of the "peacock" words are now removed, leaving it as dry as possible. You said that it needs more "context" though. I went through the FAQ page ("Why was my AfC declined?" page) and it seems that what I submitted now fits those rules perfectly. It also does not talk about context at all. Could you explain what you mean by "context?" Could you also point out a part in my submission that needs more context, or give me a general example of what it is you are looking for so I can get this fixed for you today? Thanks!
This is the article in question: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Jose_Luis_Marquez_%282%29 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larryhorwitz (talk • contribs) 15:54, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Hasteur,
Lanci is running as a Dem, not an Independent. He previously was an independent but is a registered Democrat and has been for quite some time.
Second, it is not TOO SOON. Simply google "Ken Lanci."
Thank you.
I will re-submit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mefordwashington (talk • contribs) 12:10, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
The AFC Backlog Buster Barnstar
|
||
Congratulations, Hasteur! You're receiving The Invisible Barnstar because you reviewed 65 articles during the recent AFC Backlog elimination drive! Thank you for you contributions to Wikipedia at-large and helping to keep the backlog down. We hope you continue reviewing submissions and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! Mdann52 (talk) 17:07, 15 August 2013 (UTC) |
Hi Hasteur,
Thanks for your comments. I addressed what I could. Although some of Dr. Chelikowsky's alcaldes may not stand out to you, they are in line with accomplishments listed on other Wikipedia pages of his colleagues at the Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences. I am new to contributing to Wikipedia. Can you look over the article again and see if it's up to par before I attempt resubmitting? Thanks.Mkortsha (talk) 19:31, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
You left this message for User:Offender9000. He probably won't see it because he is blocked indefinitely. Moriori (talk) 20:43, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Hasteur bot shows up in recent changes when hide bots is set to true... not sure if bug or intentional. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 02:19, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there
HasteurBot noticed that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/JB Young Ltd had not been edited for a long time. However for this one I had already accepted it, but ChzzBot out of sync, restored the article again! This is probably a bit of an edge case for the bot. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:41, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
I found a message on my talk page informing me about a dormant page in AfC space, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Battle of Mount Tabor. Any idea why this is coming up now? I sent the submission in some years back and haven't thought about it since. —Theodore! (talk) (contribs) 20:19, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
---|
Dear Hasteur, I got your message advising that the Leslie Cheek Theater article I was drafting under Articles for Creation might be deleted if I took no further action. Thank you for the message; I had forgotten that the draft article was still extent. I'd already copied its contents to a section of the article on the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts. I have now deleted the contents of the draft article, but I do not know (or I have forgotten) how to remove the article. Can you tell me how to do that, please? Thank you! |
Thank you for your prompting. I am not very familiar with Wikipedia editing, but would like to continue editing Joan Susannah Wilkinson's bio for possible inclusion. She is well known in the Bay area but it is hard to document her "notability." Your advice on editing would be appreciated. Tswilk3 (talk) 18:36, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
APerson (talk!) 23:12, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Please delete the Earl Peyroux page. I cannot find better references and near as I can tell his show has not been rebroadcast in years. I do not know a way to better justify creation of the article beyond what I've already done.Cobaltcanarycherry (talk) 00:51, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Hi Hasteur, Thanks for your speedy reply and commentary. I incorporated some additional edits, including more internal links, a book list and a third party external link. As you suggested, I also requested the page be renamed to a more formal name. Please let me know if there's any further edits you think I should make before I submit the article for another review. Thanks. Mkortsha (talk) 15:36, 19 August 2013 (UTC) |
hi haster this is musiclanka regarding about Dinesh subasinghe discography,please help me to improve that article,its about sri lankan wellknown composer's works,explain me or help me to edit it,regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musiclanka (talk • contribs) 04:20, 20 August 2013
Hasteur, can we chat please, I would need your help. many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louis.chakkalakal (talk • contribs) 15:38, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
I can do the corrections and spelling improvements in the yet-to-be-created article. I will do it. Some corrections will be made, it can also be made by other users, there are users and more users who can correct its spelling and translations from Greek who is experienced in football/soccer or from the eastern part of Athens, some elsewhere. I figure that there should be a few more users who can translate it from Greek into English. A small part of the translations that have not been improved fully, one of the reasons (lower part) is that Greece is in an economic crisis. It is absolutely intolerable and unbearable that Greece is continuing the economic crisis. There is no support especially the greatest scare that Greece experienced, the closure of ERT networks (temporary) and ERT World. The planned article is likely not to be removed and improvements along with verifications by me and other users will be done. I am very angry that ERT World has not been restored in my area and it's shameful. There is no room to put it in a sandbox, One place is transfer "Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Asteras Zografou" to the "Wikipedia:Sandbox/Football (soccer) clubs from Athens#Asteras Zografou" to have the yet-to-be-created article temporary located, a sandbox article section. Proposed articles that can be corrected and verified, the number that can check and verify nine to fifteen planned articles in one page than one. It is likely to be moved to a larger Sandbox article or "Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Football (soccer) clubs from Attica", there they can verify nine in one page instead of one in one page. If one is partly corrected, it is suggest to be moved to a larger one where it can be corrected with ten proposed articles that can be verified. Da Desirer 2 (talk) 14:44, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
The article was rarely updated for a year. If an article has rarely been updated. I suggest that the article (if checked by multiple users) is to be merged to a bigger temporary page where more experienced users can check their spelling at once. I suggest that Asteras Zografou is to be merged into "Wikipedia/Articles for creation/Sports clubs in Athens or .../Athens sports club section" which will be easier for experienced users to check spelling in several proposed articles in one page. Some users cannot find the title but they can find it with a single one. My anger is not on the articles that I created and have been deleted. My anger is on the economic crisis that is going on in Greece. When one is fully reviewed, the article can split and can be created. (New temporary article location: Wikipedia/Articles for creation/Athens sports clubs section or Wikipedia/Articles for creation/Sports-related section/Athens). Da Desirer 2 (talk) 18:21, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the notification. I did not realize that page still exists, as the article in question has already been created and overhauled. It may be viewed at Neohumanism. I have now blanked the page, which I understand amounts to a deletion request. --Abhidevananda (talk) 17:15, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
This is confusing...the noted page is just a redirect to the mainspace article. One could make a case for deleting these redirects, or a case for keeping them, but the wording of the user-message is completely off-topic. One could make a case for deletion of the redirect, but the wording of G13 doesn't mention it. And following the given link to see just what actually is (possibly) to be nom'ed for deletion gets to the article, which is also not what the warning is about. DMacks (talk) 19:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I removed the 1973 article from AFC. I had forgotten to remove it. I just set that page up on my own after AFC rejected it twice. I got your message. Thank you.Emeraldgirl (talk) 01:27, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
I added more references for the article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/M. K. K. Nair — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vikian (talk • contribs) 04:58, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Peter lind concern
Thanks for the notification. But I think its a robot notification of no importants ? Because there are now a new article Peter Lind that are up to standard ? Fa bene si (talk) 09:24, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Please do not delete the article and spare me five days to research. Currently alot of things are going in life which I dont ha e control over. Please grant me few more days so I can properly do the research work. Thank you. Khyati Gupta (talk) 14:33, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Hasteur Nice bot. I noticed that there have been a lot of CSD entries from AfC. I saw many from someone else, so thought they were being some manually, or maybe semi-automated, but more recently, I see them arriving from your bot.
I've handled quite a few, but I also see that RHaworth and JohnCD have as well.
I have a very simple question, but I'll explain why I'm asking first.
When I handle a CSD, I do a manual check of every one. I open the history, and confirm that there is a six month gap before deleting. That doesn't take long, but if there are 79,000 items in the cat, it adds up.
If I knew that the bot checks for the six month gap, I would still want to do a check, but I would be comfortable doing it every tenth one.
I read the Bot approval, and I think this is the case. However, I glanced at the link to the code, and didn't know where to go next, so I am hoping you can:
I'm also going to post a link to RHaworth and JohnCD, and ask the following: Are you comfortable with spot-checking if the bot does do the date check, or do you still feel than 100% manual checking is warranted?--SPhilbrick(Talk) 16:21, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Hello Hasteur, The below information was posted on my talk page. Mr. Lawson's first name is misspelled in the articles for creation page and doesn't need to be fixed. Please feel free to delete the page in the articles for creation section. Thanks (talk) 16:20, 20 August 2013 (UTC) Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jaime Lawson concern Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jaime Lawson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:53, 20 August 2013 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
---|
Dear HasteurBot. HasteurBot The wikipedia entry Amram Aburbeh is an article that has been edited since January 2013. Improvements done include addition of links to references and reliable sources as well as photos that were inserted in the appropriate paragraphs. Please explain your note of concern , I want to understand what do you mean when you comment Articles for creation? For example Does the article need to be in a different category? Carmel. 21 August 2013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carmel avivi-green (talk • contribs) 19:19, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. I apologize I made a mistake earlier, I hope it will fine in the future. Carmel 21 August 2013Carmel avivi-green (talk) 19:38, 21 August 2013 (UTC)← |
Extended content
|
---|
I'm on a college campus. Whoever you're trying to reach, it's not going to be easy.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:28, 21 August 2013 (UTC) |
Hi Hasteur I'm not sure whether you will receive my reply on my talk page regarding Wikipedia talk: "Articles for creation/Acting Witan of Mercia concern", so I'm giving you notice of it here. Best wishes SnoobysooSnoobysoo (talk) 11:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC) 22. 8. 2013
Thank you for your interest. I have decided to let Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Juju Bhai Tuladhar be deleted. I will restart work on it when I have more material and references. I appreciate all the feedback I have received and agree with the concerns that have been raised. Karrattul (talk) 18:01, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
I thought it was running about every half hour, but I haven't seen an addition in 90 minutes plus.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 19:37, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Hasteur, You have wrote a message via HasteurBot on the talk page of a user named Krantmlverma. He used to edit some pages but unfortunately he has been blocked on enwiki since 21 June 2012. He asked for help to many people but no-one wanted to help him. He replied your message also and waiting for your answer. If you can help him then it would be great for him. Thanks and regards, ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 18:55, 23 August 2013 (UTC)