This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 30 | ← | Archive 35 | Archive 36 | Archive 37 | Archive 38 | Archive 39 | Archive 40 |
The Doe Valley article originally redirected to the Doeville article. They're actually two separate communities, so I moved the relevant Doe Valley information from the Doeville article to the Doe Valley article, and simply removed the redirect. Does this work, or does the redirect article need to be deleted first? Bms4880 (talk) 20:14, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Your decision to revert my edit in which I removed a section is understandable, but why did you also revert the change in the caption of the comet image? The comet picture appears near the beginning of the article, and it is relevant to mention the picture was taken by Rosetta, or some people might assume that the picture already existed before the spacecraft visited the comet. Either mention that the picture was taken by Rosetta or move the image more to the end of the article. Thanks, and ping me if you reply. Huritisho (talk) 07:23, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
May need to lock this article. It has been getting slammed all week. Bms4880 (talk) 14:34, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
@Huntster: If possible, maybe review the KIC 8462852 article - to be sure all's ok - esp status of images? - uploaded by other editors - Thanking you in advance for your help - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 14:39, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
I looked for sources for alt. metal, and unfortunately came up empty. Can I get a link to this "consensus" to see if it was built on appropriate and relevant arguments and/or see if it's small enough to even be worth arguing? Otherwise it comes off as a bunch of original research to me. DannyMusicEditor (talk) 16:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
I added my rationale to the talk page of International Space Station. Please respond there or here if you are interested. Thanks. Brian Everlasting (talk) 19:39, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
(I don't know the right place to enter a message to you, so suppose you will delete this if it doesn't belong.) I was going to correct bad wording on the Uluru page, but it is locked. Apparently you have rights to edit there. I was going to change "plethora" to "abundance" because the former term means "too many" or "an excess", and it is implausible that there can be too many springs anywhere in a desert. Maybe you can take this up? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.196.122.73 (talk) 19:27, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Huntster Thanks for the prompt revert
I was just hoping there would be a fair review of sites without it seeming like there is a bias towards/ against a particular domain. Would appreciate your review and action towards Dubaifaqs and topuniversities as they have both received an excess of over 200 links each without anything being done about it for a number of years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samuraitechy (talk • contribs) 07:34, 15 November 2015
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
@Huntster: - Is the Image of "Mars Carbon Paths" ok to use? - seems useful to Mars article(s) - Image credit => "Lance Hayashida/Caltech" - perhaps funded by NASA and/or US Government I would think - in any case - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 02:14, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
I have missed you my friend. How the heck are ya doing? — Ched : ? 21:46, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Uploaded several Mars images related to NASA recently - they seem ok but may need an opinion - to be sure - the two images are as follows: 1) File:NASA-MOLA-Map-MangalaFossa.jpg and 2) File:NASA-MOC-MOLA-Map-MangalaValles-HeadRegion.png - and involve two articles (ie, "Mangala Valles" & "Mangala Fossa") - Thanks in any regards of course - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 17:27, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Noticed they're listed as alt metal and hard rock among others in the categories. Would it be logical to remove those as well? To those who find this page that have never read it before (provided they're coming from one of the category pages) it might end up striking as a bit odd that none of those are listed in the infobox. Just a thought. dannymusiceditor ~talk to me!~ 23:10, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Your free one-year account with Newspapers.com will end on December 22 2015. Newspapers.com has offered to extend existing accounts by another year. If you wish to keep your account until December 22 2016, please add your name to the Account Renewal list here. I'll let Newspapers.com customer support know, and they will extend your subscription. If you don't want to keep your account for another year, you don't have to do anything. Your account will expire unless I hear from you that you want to keep it. All the best, HazelAB (talk) 20:12, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
It would be nice if you could comment here. 80.132.94.160 (talk) 03:37, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
@Huntster: Image of Jupiter-sized exoplanets worthy? - and ok? - URL is => http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA20056 - one concern is that the "image credit" is "NASA/ESA"? - iac - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 03:29, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
You ARE "THE ONE". I would not be here if it were not for you Huntster. As much as in real physical life - you truly do have my heart and soul. I wish you the most joyful holiday season possible. I will never forget that you were there when I needed someone. Without shame I say: "I love you" ... thank you. — Ched : ? 02:30, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Just wanted to say thanks for bringing up that concern with the ((Remove border)) tag I placed on the Marvin the Martian NASA file. It was because of that I realized that the template's text and Twinkle's explanation of the template did not match. So, I updated the template's wording. Steel1943 (talk) 22:27, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
May need to lock this article. Vol fans are having fun with it. Bms4880 (talk) 20:34, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Sorry about the lost content. There was some heavy vandalism from multiple IPs and young accounts, and I likely missed a few bits here and there. --allthefoxes (Talk) 17:03, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
I'm trying to guard against reflexively fixing typos whenever there *might* be a chance I have no idea what I'm doing, so... Could you peek at section Type II Seyfert galaxies where it says "..., nuclear light reflected of a dust cloud was measured, ..." and see if 'of' shouldn't be 'off'? Thanks, Shenme (talk) 01:24, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
FYI, there is a high-quality US government photograph of the testing of full-scale oxygen preburner for the Raptor (rocket engine) in the Stennis/Lagniappe source I just added to the Raptor article. Thought you might want to have a look, and see if you think it worthy of inclusion as a Wikimedia image. Cheers. N2e (talk) 18:10, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello. I've been expanding the stub at Accretion (astrophysics) and I would be happy if you could check it out and give it a makeup as needed. Thanks, BatteryIncluded (talk) 14:43, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello and thanks for the help at the Accretion article. For about 10 years I've been using this machine to generate my references: [1] Can you recommend another similar system using an updated format? Thanks. BatteryIncluded (talk) 20:25, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
There are some really excellent Flickr photos of the rollout (on the TEL, or TE, whatever they are calling it now) of the Falcon 9 Flight 21 F9 v1.1 (the LAST one of that model, or "Block 2", or whatever) at VAFB to the launch pad. Very detailed and clear pics; best I've seen of this rocket.
Thought you might like to take a gander. Cheers. N2e (talk) 15:59, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello Huntster - if possible, perhaps an image review may help => "File:Reconstruction image of Archicebus.jpg" - and related "WP:SPA" accounts => User:IvanStallenko (talk | contribs), User:Matseverson (talk | contribs) (also see article history) - and related articles => "Mat Severson", "Archicebus" - *all* may be *entirely* ok of course - but perhaps a review may help? - in any case - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 22:44, 18 January 2016 (UTC)