This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that he has been paid by ''McKinley Padier'' on behalf of ''Filestack'' for his contributions to Wikipedia. |
This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that he has been paid by ''Gennaro Brooks-Church'' on behalf of ''Gennaro Brooks-Church'' for his contributions to Wikipedia. |
This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that he has been paid by ''Paul Avgerinos'' on behalf of ''Paul Avgerinos'' for his contributions to Wikipedia. |
This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that he has been paid by ''Hector A. Silva'' on behalf of ''Chomatic'' for his contributions to Wikipedia. |
This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that he has been paid by ''Rosie Mansfield'' on behalf of ''Rosie Mansfield'' for his contributions to Wikipedia. |
This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that he has been paid by ''Pete Polomski'' on behalf of ''Sensible Medical'' for his contributions to Wikipedia. |
This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that he has been paid by ''Primaerica'' on behalf of ''Thalia Chodat'' for his contributions to Wikipedia. |
This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that he has been paid by ''Shiela Shelton'' on behalf of ''Lucid Management'' for his contributions to Wikipedia. |
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Remote Dielectric Sensing, from its old location at User:PalmandMarsh/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liancetalk/contribs 04:23, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. This is a message to let you know that your username, "PalmandMarsh", may not comply with Wikipedia's username policy. Please note that the following types of usernames are prohibited:
For more information, see Wikipedia's username policy.
Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, website, person or other entity, nor do we tolerate any other 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior, regardless of your username. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. If you do not understand which part of the policy your username may be violating, please don't hesitate to ask. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Adog (Talk・Cont) 18:40, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
A request to rename PalmandMarsh was made 12/14/2018
Hello, Jay Bestille. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 20:49, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for pointing me to this policy's disclosure requirements and I have complied wholeheartedly. Jay Bestille (talk) 14:00, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Jay Bestille!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:40, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
|
Hello Jay Bestille, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Video on demand have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:16, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:33, 31 December 2018 (UTC)Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Gennaro Brooks-Church, you may be blocked from editing.
It's hard to take your efforts at editing neutrally seriously when you call your clients "pioneers". Grayfell (talk) 22:52, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia is, primarily, a volunteer project. We do not give special attention to unpaid edits, because we assume that everyone here is unpaid. Almost all editors are presummed to be volunteers working to to build an encyclopedia. Your careful declaration of which edits are not paid is a big red flag that you don't understand what Wikipedia is and how it works. Because Wikipedia's mission is fundamentally incompatible with promotion, advertising, public relations, "personal branding" etc. we have strict guidelines for how paid editing is regarded. Unfortunately, you appear to have been ignoring several of these guidelines. Yes, you have disclosed your paid edits, but this is not sufficient.
You should not be creating articles yourself. You should go through WP:AFC for every article for which you have a COI. No exceptions. Understand?
Similarly the only edits you should be making to COI articles are reverts of vandalism which are completely non-controversial. Substantial edits should be proposed on the article's talk page through Template:Request edit or similar. Understand?
If you can follow these guidelines, you might be able to contribute productively. If you cannot do this, you will be blocked as a spammer, and the project will be better off without you. Please respond here demonstrating that you understand these issues. Grayfell (talk) 22:35, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
some editors have a major bias against paid editors, this is absolutely the case, and I consider myself one of them. Did you stop to think about why this might be a problem? Please take a look at Conflict-of-interest editing on Wikipedia for just a tiny taste of the headaches and hassles this causes. Editors, including myself, have been sued and doxxed and worse over COI editing, so we take this seriously even if you do not.
@Jay Bestille: irrespective of the discussion above, please note that, if you wish to operate as a paid editor on Wikipedia, you must fully comply with WP:PAID. You are off to a good start at User_talk:Jay_Bestille#Disclosed_Paid_contributions:, but you have to go further; If you have been hired and paid via a website (Upwork, Freelancer), you must disclose it. If you—as is implied by your "package" comment—are employed by a company in the course of your editing, you must disclose it. In short, you must disclose the names of any and every employer, client, and affiliate you are connected to, per WP:PAID. Please understand also that complete transparency is your best course of action, for while Wikipedia is built around the idea of WP:AGF, I am noting from this page, COIN, and the Teahouse that your goodwill is being worn thin. Best.--SamHolt6 (talk) 05:44, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 01:30, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
A sockpuppet investigation is underway at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Particularinstance. You are invited to comment, and note that this is an investigation and not an indication of any wrongdoing on your part.--SamHolt6 (talk) 03:22, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the page Draft:Remote Dielectric Sensing, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition was deleted under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License." You may also e-mail or mail the Foundation to release the content. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more.
While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page.—Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:10, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
In fact there was no copyright on the referenced source, and we had permissions to use verbatim. This action seems to have ulterior motive per 'editor' Grayfell. This notice and 'user' or 'editor' Fuhghettaboutit will be noted in actions taken outside this public forum. 1/28/2019 via representation by counsel.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Filestack, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 01:08, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
1/28/2019 - Page being copied/referenced for a complaint filed at the Pinellas County Clerk's office via legal representation.
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
I've revoked your access to this talk page for the above postings violating WP:NLT; you can appeal your block through WP:UTRS, however until at the minimum you withdraw such legal action/threats you will not be allowed to edit here. Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:27, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Jay Bestille. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Angelo De Augustine".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the ((db-afc))
, ((db-draft))
, or ((db-g13))
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:30, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gennaro Brooks-Church is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gennaro Brooks-Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meeanaya (talk) 17:55, 11 August 2019 (UTC)