|
|
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Jerome Frank Disciple! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 16:34, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Sideswipe9th (talk) 18:00, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi Jerome Frank Disciple, I hope you haven't logged off yet.
You've referred to Golbez (no ping) several times (in your 17:27, 7 June 2023 post and your 00:08, 8 June 2023 post) as "Gomez". You might want to do a ctrl-f on "Gomez" and fix that. Regards, ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 00:18, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
The article Death of Cooper Harris you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Death of Cooper Harris and Talk:Death of Cooper Harris/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Actualcpscm -- Actualcpscm (talk) 18:00, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Because you deserve it. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:51, 12 June 2023 (UTC) |
The article Death of Cooper Harris you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Death of Cooper Harris for comments about the article, and Talk:Death of Cooper Harris/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Actualcpscm -- Actualcpscm (talk) 20:22, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Algeria=France=Algeria. Just posted a big explainer on that. Otherwise thank you for your attempt to mediate; I think you are demonstrating some logic and open-mindedness. Good luck with that. I will try to catch you at the talk page before really, I must get back to the dramas I already have in progress. 07:35, 18 June 2023 (UTC) Elinruby (talk) 07:35, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
At User_talk:Leke23#List_of_Donald_Trump_endorsements_editing you wrote "you cannot revert a page 3 times within 24 hours", missing the "more than". Of course there was also CTOP and BRD issues, but still. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:04, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
It was off topic and kind of personal, but I wanted to answer the question you had about why I identify with the issue so strongly. It has been a rather passionate pursuit of mine ever since I first started editing, and had an encounter with a more experienced editor who told me that I could not include a single sentence within an article because it was "not notable". I did my own research into the guidance, and found out he was wrong, and argued my point well enough to finally have this stupid little sentence included in the article. I thought it was so absurd I vowed to spend the rest of my editing career educating others to think for themselves and do their own research. The discussion about it is archived right here if you want more context. Huggums537 (talk) 09:37, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Jerome, I have a lot of grievances with the way you've been treating me. Especially with the recent portrayals here and here of the above paragraph where you kept referencing this as a "crusade" with a false quotational link to NNC making a false representation to others about what I have said here. You made me out as a personal crusader for NNC, but what I told you here was that "I vowed to spend the rest of my editing career educating others to think for themselves and do their own research", and that includes my other philosophies about being able to use primary sourcing as well as other editing philosophies I learned from that experience which I am completely allowed to have. You also lambasted me for my views by chastising me for simply making a suggestion without opening an RfC about it (without linking any proof mind you) while you let someone on your own side of the debate do the very same thing without saying a word to them. This could be seen as a form of badgering the opposition. I don't know what asshole thing I did or said to you, but I'm sorry for whatever it was. All I'm asking is that you just please lay the heck of my ass and stop lambasting my views or making them out to be something they are not because I have lots of personal philosophies thank you very much, not just this one single "NNC personal crusade" you have made it out to be. Thanks. Huggums537 (talk) 09:47, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
I vowed to spend the rest of my editing career" line and the explanation that it traced back to a revert another editor made when you first started editing, I figured that wouldn't be a controversial descriptor! I'll absolutely refrain from the term
Why we should not include the names of the victims even though they revealed their names on the channel from what I watched years ago before it got terminated. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2023 (UTC)