If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Madarchod (Slang) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://simplechefrecipe.com/what-is-a-blue-mother-f-drink/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 11:33, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madarchod (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Spicy (talk) 23:58, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Tauhid Anwar Avik, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PICKLEDICAE🥒 16:05, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Bangladeshi racing drivers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:19, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. --Blablubbs (talk) 16:46, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Jgqdg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I know I've violated some policies and made two articles about self-promotion. But I'd take pride in stating that I've contributed to this project significantly, and all I've wanted was to make the wiki a better place than it was yesterday. Please review my previous account in which I became a trusted user, I massively contributed to the WIR project, also an AFC reviewer, DYKs, and New Page Patrol reviewer. But yes, I've done some wrong things, which I've learned my lessons from. And I'd not self-promo ever again. Please consider reviewing my 99% edits which are undisputedly helpful to this project, that's all my intention. Yes, I admit, I sidetracked and tried to benefit from self-exposure, but please also do take into account my majority of edits that were beneficial for this project. I admit to each of my self-promo wrongdoings, and I'd never performed any such acts ever again. I've not even in this account or in the previous one whereas I stated almost every bit of edits were to make this wiki a better place, except those tiny few ones which were of self-promotion. I do take full responsibility for my wrongdoings and malicious actions, and I vow not to disrupt this project by any such means ever again. Please I ask for another chance to make keeping this wiki better every day. I'd keep doing anything to show my sincerity to this project and earn trust again. Thanks, and I really hope to be back. Jay (talk) 21:58, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per the consensus over at Blablubbs' talk page. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:35, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Jay (talk) 21:58, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Which account would you edit from if unblocked? And disclose any other accounts you created that we are not aware of. Daniel Case (talk) 06:13, 21 September 2022 (UTC)