Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
Happy editing! Cheers, R.COutlander07@talk 07:30, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi, @Jude Didimus: I have noticed you have edited a significant number of articles relating to Syriac Catholicism in India and would just like to thank you for your work. I noticed some of your edits are not quite what Wikipedia standards seek and I would like to offer any help I can provide so that your edits can stay up. Let me know what I can do to help! ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:38, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
You may add the cn templates
A tag has been placed on Category:1564 establishments in India indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 06:06, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Veverve. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Catholicos-Patriarch of the East, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 08:32, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
@Veverve: see https://books.google.com/books?id=CnSCAgAAQBAJ page 10 and https://books.google.com/books?id=2b4ADqorY1oC page 65 Jude Didimus (talk) 09:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
I agree with that. But you must understand that the correct one is the present one. Even the current churches are using this title. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jude Didimus (talk • contribs)
That's what I said I agree Jude Didimus (talk) 09:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Somehow you resemble my very old Wikipedia pal AARYA SAJAYAN and I believe he is back with a new countenance, did I say it right? R.COutlander07@talk 10:14, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
@Outlander07: Sorry. I am new. My interests are different as you can see. Anyway nice to meet you.Jude Didimus (talk) 13:08, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
I don't think so. Anyway, expect you should contribute enough to Wikipedia, welcome aboard. R.COutlander07@talk 15:51, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
hey Jude some of your articles on Cardinal mar george alenchery does'nt seem genuine please do provide the proof for these titles and kindly refer wikipedia as I've mentioned in my chan.ge — Preceding unsigned comment added by TRHmTivl (talk • contribs) 17:17, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Janee Peter Jude Didimus (talk) 15:09, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:51, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Jude Didimus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
(This is copy of the unban request which I have filed in User talk:Qaumrambista. I am copying that here because this account (Jude Didimus) is my original account. The blocking administrator (RoySmith) erroneously labelled Qaumrambista as the original account.)
I request the admins to reconsider my indefinite block due to the following reasons: * I have not used an alternative account for any illegitimate purposes as mentioned in [1]. # I have not created an illusion of support: I have never involved any one of my accounts in discussions related to another one. # I did not circumvent policies: I have not edited any page where I am restricted in any of my accounts. #I did not use strawman socks: I have not done that. I have never involved an alternative account in any discussions involving one of my accounts. #I did not evade sanctions: I have not used any one of my accounts to evade sanctions. I am binding to that even now while I am blocked. #I did not contribute to the same page or discussion with multiple accounts: I have not used more than one accounts to edit simultaneously in an article or in a discussion. Before forming a new account, I may have edited an article with the older one (Jude Didimus), but never in the same section. #Avoiding scrutiny: If I have violated this, it was totally unintentional. I had actually forgotten the password to Jude Didimus that is why I created a new account. #Editing while logged out in order to mislead: I have never intentionally did that. #Misusing a clean start: Actually, I created a new account since I had forgotten the password to my older one. Later I was able to retrieve the password from an alternative browser when I tried to edit Wikimedia commons. * My older account is Jude Didimus and if asked, I promise to edit only with that account in the future. (The blocking administrator erroneously labelled Qaumrambista as the original account.) * On the basis of this and also since I am a new user, I request a relaxation in my block. Atleast a relaxation in the indefinite time period. Jude Didimus (talk) 8:54 pm, Today (UTC−4)
Decline reason:
((subst:This is already being discussed at User talk:Qaumrambista, so closing this one)) -- RoySmith (talk) 02:06, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.