Lets talk here Hi Kavdiamanju, I have mentioned this as the reason. Is this acceptable? "This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... This article does not interfere in any way of the ongoing investigations. It is not hurtful to any concerned person. Rather, it sheds light on the gentle life of Vanessa Marcotte. It is neither derogatory nor insulting to the deceased, nor hurtful of sentiments of the deceased's family and friends. Rather than deleting this article, it should be expanded upon for the sake of justice to the spirit of Vanessa Marcotte"

Kireadsalot (talk) 20:37, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I declined the speedy because the references cited are a good faith claim of notability. No objections if you send this to AfD, though. --Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kavfiamanju,

Would it be helpful if I added more credits? The number of credits and role and notable company seemed I thought should speak for importance of the figure. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheNazz412 (talk • contribs) 21:07, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help for making edits on Pyze. I am not able to upload logo on Pyze, can you help me?