This user may have left Wikipedia. LakesideMiners has not edited Wikipedia since January 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Click here to message me. I will attempt to reply as soon as I can. All replies will be made directly underneath your message on this page. But BE KIND!
ANY type of hate towards ANY group will be removed from this talk page.(unless I can tell that you do not mean anything bad by it, case by case basis) Everyone should be treated kindly.
Please create your message with a subject/headline and "sign" your message using four tildes (eg: ~~~~) at the end.
Experienced editors have my permission to talk page stalk and respond to any message or contribute to any thread here.
IF THIS IS AN URGENT MATTER THAT NEEDS MY IMMEDIATE ATTENTION PLEASE EMAIL ME BY CLICKING THE LINK THAT SAYS "EMAIL ME" EMAIL ME
This is LakesideMiners's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 5 days |
Hi,
Thought that the article was slanted very negatively, to begin with, but trying to keep an open mind! What part of my edits struck you as sooo biased that you unilaterally reversed them. Thanks! 2600:1702:2350:20F0:C435:AFA4:EED2:A38B (talk) 18:43, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
I have started a new round of discussions with Spyrazzle regarding the controversy section in the "Our Lady of Fátima" page i hope senior editors will keep an eye on the talk page arbitrate fairly between us, the last time i was banned unfairly for 36 hours by herecomesjamie for adding material not sourced, which is ironic because in fact i did source the material i added and it is the same exact sources Spyrazzle used to build his controversy section, if they were good to build the section why are they not good for a rebutel? anyways please help keep this fair and professional, Thank you all — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fadi153 (talk • contribs) 10:09, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
I stated FACTS as to why this drop was ended. It wasn't over PETA, they backed out and Animal Help Now took over. The drop ended because they harmed the opossum with a leg hold trap. Her leg was amputated and I WAS THE ONE PAID THE NEARLY $800 bill! I am a 31 year opossum rehabber who kept Millie after surgery and the one to rescued her from the event. To remove the truth is wrong and I just donated to keep Wikipedia going.... I won't make that mistake again. If its proof you want ,I can give you any and all the proof that this event was ended because of cruelty to animals. Its sad the truth is removed. Beth Sparks, Founder and Director of The Opossum's Pouch Sanctuary, Rescue and Rehab — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1004:B0A9:3E4D:D0A2:EC7C:66D:D5DF (talk) 16:11, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)