Hello, Listenforgood, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 08:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
Thank you for your changes to Progressive. However, disambiguation pages are not articles, and don't follow the same style- they're navigation aids whose purpose is to make clear the different uses of a particular title. Each entry should only be as long as it needs to be to achieve this; for more details, please see the manual of style on the subject, or take a look at the notice which appears every time you edit a disambiguation page.
This is why I've reverted your changes, which included content that belongs in articles, not disambiguation pages.
I also don't understand why you changed the entry for ""Progressive" (song)", since the link is clearly for the specific song of that name, and not a general article describing "a single composition between two-to-sixteen minutes with chord structures, time signatures, modulations and intricate movement".
For these reasons, unfortunately I've decided to revert your changes. Hope this isn't too much of a disappointment, and we look forward to your further contributions to Wikipedia in future!
All the best, Ubcule (talk) 18:51, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Jytdog (talk) 06:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Charlotte's web (cannabis). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jytdog (talk) 15:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Please let me explain how Wikipedia works... There are some non-intuitive things about editing here, that I can zip through ~pretty~ quickly....
The first thing, is that our mission is to produce articles that provide readers encyclopedia articles that summarize accepted knowledge, and to do that as a community that anyone can be a part of. That's the mission. As you can imagine, if this place had no norms, it would be a Mad Max kind of world interpersonally, and content would be a slag heap (the quality is really bad in parts, despite our best efforts). But over the past 15 years the community has developed a whole slew of norms, via loads of discussion. One of the first, is that we decide things by consensus. That decision itself, is recorded here: WP:CONSENSUS, which is one of our "policies". (There is a whole forest of things, in "Wikipedia space" - pages in Wikipedia that start with "Wikipedia:AAAA" or for short, "WP:AAAA". WP:CONSENSUS is different from Consensus. ) And when we decide things by consensus, that is not just local in space and time, but includes meta-discussions that have happened in the past. Those are the norms. We call them policies and guidelines - and these documents all reside in Wikipedia space. There are policies and guidelines that govern content, and separate ones that govern behavior. Here is very quick rundown:
In terms of behavior, the key norms are:
If you can get all that (the content and behavior policies and guidelines) under your belt, you will become truly "clueful", as we say. If that is where you want to go, of course. I know that was a lot of information, but hopefully it is digestable enough. Jytdog (talk) 00:07, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello Jytdog, that's a lot to read up on, and I really appreciate you taking the time to lay it all out point by point. I apologize for my long winded "talk." I have a lot of passion about this topic but I'm a patient learner. If I can tune-up my references to the WP standard, I'll be a better contributor. Thanks again. Listenforgood (talk) 06:12, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello Jtydog, rather than post an edit, let me know if this complies with WP decorum!
Cannabis contains many cannabinoids with weak or no psychoactivity that, therapeutically, might be more promising than ∆9-THC. (PubMed summary)[1] The primary cannabinoid[2] in Charlotte's Web Hemp Oil, cannabidiol (CBD), exerts several positive pharmacological effects that make it a highly attractive therapeutic entity in inflammation, diabetes, cancer and affective or neurodegenerative diseases. ∆9-THCV has been shown to express the pharmacological profile of a CB1 antagonist, with potential use in obesity treatment. Reports have demonstrated the antipsychotic action of CBD in human models of psychotic symptoms induced in volunteers and in psychotic patients, with fewer unwanted side effects such as catalepsy. ∆9-THC, CBD, CBG, CBC, D9-THCA and CBDA have been shown to exert anti-proliferative/pro-apoptotic effects in a panel of tumor cell lines: human breast carcinoma, human prostate carcinoma, human colorectal carcinoma and human gastric adenocarcinoma. (Full review from 2009)[3]
References
Listenforgood (talk) 00:42, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
References
Please take the time to format your citations. It is bad for several reasons, and it is not reasonable to make other people dp that. See WP:Bare URL.
Adding references is easy with this tool (which is explained in detail here and also see step 5b of WP:MEDHOW for an alternate method). Just submit the PubMed ID, ISBN, or other identifier, and copy and paste the resulting output (xxxx) into the page between <ref> xxxxx </ref> Alternatively, if you use Internet Explorer or Firefox (2.0+), then Wouterstomp's bookmarklet can automate this step from the PubMed abstract page. Jytdog (talk) 20:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cannabidiol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Psychomotor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC) [1] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Long time. I hope you have been well. Hey, in this dif you linked to a NEJM paper that was on the internet at squarespace. That's a copyright violation. Please don't do that, per WP:ELNEVER. Best regards, Jytdog (talk) 00:28, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Cannabidiol, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Alexbrn (talk) 05:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)