Hi, MIkabella. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme))
on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Epeefleche (talk) 22:52, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Char Davies. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Epeefleche (talk) 22:33, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Eppefleche: I am at a loss as to what you are talking about. This is not original research, it does not advance a position, it is not a novel synthesis. I cited three reliable sources in this paragraph. They are not from wikipedia but from art journals and books. Nowhere does wikipedia say this is not allowed. I will now be working with the women artist project. I will be talking with them about this. Please do not keep removing what I have put up. Thanks.MIkabella (talk) 22:48, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Please tell me which exact parts of each sentence do you consider to be original research. I have looked at many men and women artist pages and they do not differ from mine so far. IF I have to get every single sentence approved by one person, then how is this a community project. MIkabella (talk) 22:57, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for that but what about the second sentence which is almost a quote from the book from which I cited it from. This is considered a reliable source in the artworld. BTW what community do I refer to and do you know the subject? What about the third sentence and fourth sentences? These seem to me to be facts. I am looking at other wikipedia aritlces and they do not have citations after every sentence. MIkabella (talk) 23:49, 6 May 2014 (UTC)