Dude can move Vijay (actor) to Vijay (politician)[edit]

Dude he has has announced that he won't be acting anymore since he started a political party can you change the page to Vijay (politician) it would be more appropriate orelse the page name sounds like he will be acting in politics 😅Danteishere (talk) 15:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @Danteishere, please stop making disruptive edits and removing selective content which has been referenced from the article first. If you want to propose a page move, you can do it in the talk page, so that if consensus is there, it can be done. IMO, Because he has been primarily an actor and continues to be, this might seem more appropriate for the time being. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 04:30, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bharat Ratna
added a link pointing to Statesman
List of districts of Tamil Nadu
added a link pointing to Arani

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:46, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your GA nomination of MS Dhoni[edit]

The article MS Dhoni you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:MS Dhoni and Talk:MS Dhoni/GA3 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pharaoh496 -- Pharaoh496 (talk) 13:24, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Magentic Manifestations mate, I admire your work on articles. However, I have observed you for months rogue editing and removing edits you dont like. Please stop Pharaoh496 (talk) 13:50, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Pharaoh496 Pal! The comment is unwarranted. This is definitely not a place where you add/remove something as per your personal opinions and you are only trying to express your POV on my edits. If you have something specific and valid, please feel free to discuss. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 13:56, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Pal!! I am not adding or removing anything. Lets discuss this on the talk page! Pharaoh496 (talk) 14:08, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Let me know your points. I am awaiting your comments as you had initiated the GA review. As I had stated, you have to review against the GA criteria. Hope you are aware that the lead summarizes the article. While it is being reviewed for GA, it is a norm not to add/delete content. As a reviewer, unless you have technical changes to make, I am not sure why you are hell-bent on adding something that is not sourced in the article, technically incorrect and an unnecessary comparisons in the lead. I am reverting back to status quo till this is resolved. As you should be well aware, this has already reached WP:3RR, so let us discuss and get ahead with the actual review, if you are inclined towards taking this to a good article status. If we cannot reach a consensus, then it definitely warrants an intervention. Thanks! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 14:40, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Mate, its not a norm, but the rules say reviewer can try fixing some edits himself. I have posted my points, please read. Pharaoh496 (talk) 14:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I will work on the comments and revert. Thanks! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 14:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Check this article[edit]

India at the Cricket World Cup What can be done about this? (See the problems on top) What if it is split edition-wise, for eg. India at the Olympics It has India at the 2024 Summer Olympics, India at the 2020 Summer Olympics, India at the 2016 Summer Olympics etc. Pharaoh496 (talk) 18:20, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article requires a lot of work indeed as there is very less actual information which is interspersed with what is like a fan commentary and poorly sourced. The article is indeed very long as well given that there have been 10+ WCs so far. There can be a single summary article and standalone articles for individual world cups which might help reduce the length. You can proposed this in the talk page or WP:IND for inputs from others, based on which they can be worked upon. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 05:52, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I have tried in the past but the thing is that not many people seem to care, I have worked on this article for around six months and during the campaign. You can imagine how it was before.
Im looking for Indian cricket related editors like yourself who can you know, empathetically work on this and make it good and all Pharaoh496 (talk) 06:26, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ykw: Im gonna do it. Lets see whether stuff hits the fan Pharaoh496 (talk) 06:30, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You can be bold and do it with the rationale. Meanwhile, would also suggest initiating a discussion simultaneously as there might have been a similar discussion elsewhere. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 11:13, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
i keep writing on the talk page and no one responds. I will do it in a couple days Pharaoh496 (talk) 11:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Do it in the WP:IND page, there will be responses as it is for all India related articles. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 11:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]