Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. I think the information you have contributed is valuable, but to enter it in Wikipedia you must indicate the source of the information. Submissions that do not indicate the source of the information will be reverted. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability. Freetrashbox (talk) 11:54, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Pl.so, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 16:40, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Erigavo, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:41, 29 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Opone into Hafun. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Ninja Diannaa (Talk) 14:45, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Muscab30, and thank you for your contributions relating to Somaliland! Based off of your edits, you may be interested in visiting WikiProject Somaliland, joining the project, or joining our discussions, but there is no obligation. For more information, feel free to contact me or ask a question on the project's talk page. Happy editing!

Johnson524 14:58, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have seen your edit in Erigavo. Not only in this article, you indicate very few sources in your edit. In particular, rewriting existing descriptions without sources is an act of vandalism against Wikipedia. Freetrashbox (talk) 21:51, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Erigavo is internationally recognised city in Somalia. Referencing fake Republic is an act of vandalism against Wikipedia Muscab30 (talk) 23:20, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am not saying that your description is wrong or the current Wikipedia's description is correct. However, Wikipedia descriptions always require a source of information. If your description is correct, you should be able to find suitable sources. See WP:VERIFY. Freetrashbox (talk) 23:55, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Muscab30! Your additions to Bosaso have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) is not a compatible license. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dhahar District have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 04:17, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Alula, Somalia. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:54, 31 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! I'm Sumanuil. Your recent edit(s) to the page Dhahar District appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 23:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @Muscab30, thank for your for contributing Wikipedia articles about Somalia. If you intend to continue along these lines, you might be interested in becoming a member of WikiProject Puntland, where we are trying to fill the Puntland gap on English Wikipedia. You can sign up under 'New registrations' on Wikipedia:WikiProject Puntland/New members. QalasQalas (talk) 10:58, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Freetrashbox (talk) 11:00, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Not sure what's up at Bosaso, but if the edit warring continues, expect a partial block per WP:3RR. —C.Fred (talk) 13:28, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  As editor I am always following and upholding Wikipedia policy, am ready any conflict resolution. But, my brother @dolf133 he is running to edit page with no concrete reference on his view and he is avoiding to make civic discussions. Muscab30 (talk) 14:24, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Daniel Case (talk) 19:58, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

unblock|reason= i didn't edit newly any topic ralated Horn of Africa, i have conflict someone with topic related Bosaso and this issue there ongoing draft related the history part of Bosaso, i am always ready and aware to uphold Wikipedia policy and already mentioned in my talk page that i do and i will follow to engage civility based discussionsMuscab30 (talk) 21:02, 23 January 2024 (UTC)))Reply[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Muscab30 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i saw the case you mentioned related horn of Africa i want to inform you this was unintentionally technical error in my phone my intention it was not to revert repeatedly but happen mistakenly and i correct that happen unintentional way as you can see it i am aware the risk of three times revert in the contentious pagesMuscab30 (talk) 4:32 pm, 23 January 2024, last Tuesday (2 days ago) (UTC−5)

Accept reason:

per discussion. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:38, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Daniel Case: OK to unblock?-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, OK, he's made a similarly regretful email to me. And he's now CTOPS-aware. I really don't think he's disruptively-minded, just got carried away. Time served seems fine. Daniel Case (talk) 03:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks @Daniel Case and @Deepfriedokra for reviewing and accepting my case. Many Regards Muscab30 (talk) 17:38, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

my pleasure -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're welcome! Daniel Case (talk) 18:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes), a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the ((Ctopics/aware)) template.

Daniel Case (talk) 20:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Muscab30, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as MerveTanri1 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. — AP 499D25 (talk) 03:19, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Noted, but, i am not using another account. Thank you for your communication. Muscab30 (talk) 09:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am very disappointed that you accused me and gave me warning ⚠️ without evidence, I am not associated or coordinating any other account or person. Your means is allegations. And I hope you gave me warning with evidence. Now I am aware Wikipedia policy. Many Regards. Muscab30 (talk) 15:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On the Bosaso article, I had noticed that a recently created account by the name of 'MerveTanri1' had restored the previous version of the article that you had been reverting to earlier. Not only that, but the edit was a manual revert, was done with VisualEditor and had the 'mobile edit' and 'mobile web edit' tags which is what made me a bit suspicious of possible sockpuppetry here. Anyways, thanks for the response, noted! — AP 499D25 (talk) 00:56, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

you are welcome anytime Muscab30 (talk) 01:01, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]