for reverting the vandalism on O-Zone. It was on my watchlist, but I'd never looked in the history, so I thought it was just a really short article. I'd been planning to expand it, but now I realize I don't have to. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 00:57, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, it's too bad there aren't more (free) non-concert photos of Ayu on the web. If only she would visit my city ... Ink Runner (talk) 00:52, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
You said "Please read that section more carefully." However, WikiProject Albums#Formatting says:
I think that it explains about albums.--ACSE (talk) 06:31, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi.
Well, i`m not sure what do you mean by "fairly obvious" but i only did it because that`s what the project guidelines says an article must have, without it they are just stubs. That`s it. Zidane tribal (talk) 01:19, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Repeated action counts of removal of content they do not like can be considered vandalism, and your warning was done in complete bad faith as you could have just left a message on my talk like I have done. MS (Talk|Contributions) 20:55, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:35, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
I reverted your recent edit to Live Prayer. While it is true that the large font size did not appear in the original, this is not the issue as this large font size appears throughout the entire quote. The statement "emphasis in original" is denoting the fact that the original source had the statement "FOR THAT REASON, HE WILL NOT BE RE-ELECTED" in all caps, whereas the rest of the text used normal capitalization. Your edit was reverted as you removed the statement "emphasis in original" for no valid reason as it was added per WP:MOS.
--Webley455 (talk) 20:42, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
At most, one external link to a commercial topic is usually allowed. The exceptions are rare, and they are definitely not blogs that give readers personal commentary on how difficult it is to shop for shoes. An external link should add something significant and encyclopedic to topic, and in this case, it appears to add nothing. It's just a social site. Take a look at FA articles for major rock stars. Notice: no blogs as external links. Thanks, Piano non troppo (talk) 21:58, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi I come in good faith, a comment by you as been replied on its respective talk page. ciao Mrdonut2142 (talk) 14:24, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Well,the RIAJ Top Digital Songs chart does pass, which is the exact same thing as the Recochoku charts. The RIAJ Top Digital Songs is literally just the Recochoku charts posted on their website lol. It says at the top, (「着うたフル(R)」), which is the chart made by Recochoku. If you notice, RIAJ has stopped publishing this chart. That is because Recochoku now publishes the cahrt itself.
I'm not trying to start a war or anything. Maybe we could work towards getting Recochoku recognized (since right now, essentially part of Recochoku --the part that the RIAJ had published-- is recognized while the part that the RIAJ did not publish is not.) Impracticable (talk)
I'm thinking maybe a format like this.
Year | Title | Charts/Sales | Certifications | Album | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical Sales | Digital Sales | Airplay | Physical Sales | Digital Sales | Ringtones | Full Song | Physical | |||
2009 | "Sunrise ~Love Is All~" | 1 | 1 | 15 | 110,169+ | 750,000+ | 2x Platinum | Platinum | Gold | 11th Studio Album |
"Sunset ~Love Is All~" | 11 | – | – | – | – | |||||
"You Were..." | 1 | 3 | 43 | 114,725+ | – | – | – | Gold | ||
"Ballad" | 36 | – | – | – | – | |||||
2010 | "Microphone" | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
"Don't Look Back" | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
"Sexy Little Things" | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Opinions?
PS, just for the record, I've been the one who's done all the major format revisions of this specific table for the last year or so. (I added certifications, the Billboard section, etc). I feel like a change of this caliber will make it easier to read and simpler, but also more accurate. Instead of showing a billion sales charts (no really, 5 is way too many) and 3 billboard charts (one of which is a sales chart and one is a hybrid sales & airplay) why not have 3 charts that show the three different formats? correct?
My issues: Songs chart seperately on digital charts when they chart together on physical charts. So, that's the reason for that split up. But which song does the physical sales go to? both?
Please don't change the meaning of a sentence and call it a "Reword."
You took the true, referenced fact that on Feb 8th the final case molds were approved, and "reworded" it into an assertion that mass production had begun, and that units had begun to ship in "early February". Both are false.
In fact, no final units have gone to customers because none have been made yet.
"Mass Production" is a little vague, but no manufacturing of interest has "started" recently. The electronics were mass produced months ago, the joystick nubs over a year ago, and the mass production of the plastics will begin either late February or early March.
(You may have been confused by forum posts by the developers who recently excitedly posted that they had received their pre-production prototype units.) APL (talk) 04:46, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi! You reverted my changes about the song Mix Dojdi in the article of Radu Sirbu. Well, it's not released so obviously it does not belong in the discography section. Here is the song, and the lyrics, so we have a source. I'm not going to add the information again if you not agree. / Alexey KzKrann (talk) 19:21, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
As per your comment on my talkpage, I was not aware of the Wikipedia guideline on etquiette, but now that I am I will refrain from personally attacking Anonymous. However, what I won't be refraining from is my commitment to keep the criticism that I wrote about IPS on the Wiki-article which Anonymous is trying to delete. Since you have anti-vandalism and anti-Wikipedia edit blocking powers, I ask that you mediate this dispute and speedily resolve this issue in a fair and judicious manner. Fellytone (talk) 03:37, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know. Rich Farmbrough, 00:26, 30 April 2010 (UTC).
It's okay xD On a page like that I can totally understand, plus it was from so much further back with edits in the middle that it gets kind of difficult to separate it all out across versions.
To be honest, the main hint (to me, at least) was the fact it said "1995" under the "1998" section. But no, it's fine xD ~Chelsea (talk) 17:06, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
You seem to be the person to come to about Tokio/One Ok Rock stuff. I'm trying to make 2010 in Japanese music as awesome as possible - you wouldn't be able to create articles for the Tokio/One Ok Rock related stuff, would you? There's just "Advance/Mata Asa ga Kuru," "Kanzen Kankaku Dreamer," and Niche Syndrome at the moment, but I'm sure there's more that'll come up! --Prosperosity (talk) 04:26, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, Mr (Miss?) Sorafune, but it was not just a funeral procession in an Orthodox church (which would not be allowed at any rate!). It was an Orthodox *funeral service* (at a ROCOR church at that!) which ARE NOT prayed for non-Orthodox. This is prima facie evidence that Sergei became Orthodox sometime between his finding God and his murder. Orthohawk (talk) 02:39, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
How about this for proof: a note on Fr. Sergius at http://www.theophanydesigns.com/rcs/sources.html
SHUKIN * Father Sergius (t1978) A priest who recently died in Canada. When he was a young man he traveled to Optina Monastery to get advice from Elder Nektary concerning how he should live a Christian life in an antichrjstian society. Having concocted elaborate plans in his mind as to how to start secret catacomb lay brotherhoods, he approached the Elder and asked him what he should do. Elder Nektary replied calmly, “Step by step.” Father Sergius left humbled, yet he followed the Elder’s advice, and after suffering for many years, he was ordained reader by Patriarch Tikhon himself and eventually became a priest, later emigrating to the West. He has provided a fascinating description of the life of the Catacomb Church (in which he describes himself in the third person as “Paul”). He kept abreast of information Concerning Orthodoxy in the Soviet Union (see Pp. 162-79), and personally interviewed Sergei Kourdakov at which time he discovered that he was an Orthodox Christian (see “The Orthodox Word”, no. 59, Nov.-Dec. 1974). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Orthohawk (talk • contribs) 02:58, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
There are plenty out there. Just to name a few: Coldplay (awards section), this is a good article. Taylor Swift ( Awards and nominations section), another good example. Clari 2010 (talk) 01:12, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
See here, for some thoughts about supporting additional fields in ((infobox person)). Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:47, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
He was Acting President from 25 March 2005 to 15 August 2005, at which point he got full presidential power until he resigned on 15 April 2010 (in reality, until 7 April 2010 but that's a different story). Therequiembellishere (talk) 20:42, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
You deliberately altered a sourced fact based on your own belief regarding a release date. Fact, you are wrong...release date is June 7th, and you had no place changing it without a source to back up your own bullshit change. Warning was perfectly valid...you've been around long enough to know the guidelines. magnius (talk) 00:31, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Since when has that been a factor into whether or not an image can be used for fair use in an article? It's an artifact from the screenshot being taken, not a factor into whether or not the image can be used for Wikipedia's encyclopedic purposes.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:22, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Please try to use more than two references. Here's a whole selection of articles on Superfly.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:42, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Also you mixed up Hello Hello's tracklist with Ai wo Komete Hanataba wo.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:43, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
In addition, quotation marks around songs are not bolded, please use the Japanese title of the song in the lead, and take note of Category:Superfly albums, Category:Superfly songs, and Template:Superfly.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:25, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
The band uses this name in all media that feature their name in the English language. Not "Ikimono Gakari". On the English Wikipedia, the official name of non-English subjects takes precedence over the "common name" unless a consensus is determined otherwise.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:56, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi! If you remember, you edited the Shinee article with me. I need your help again. Shinee is releasing its second full-length album soon and it seems a whole load of unregistered users (or DA fans!) have started to edit the GA status article a lot. They have even disturbed the general layout without discussion (all musician biographies on wikipedia are required to follow a general layout that can't be changed). Since, they don't even know about the rules and standards of wikipedia it is impossible to hold them back. We rather edit other articles than keep reverting their mindless fandom. But I think it had now become important that we make a separate Shinee discography article. Fans have added even the track listings. This had really messed up the page, but I dont want the GA status to go away since we worked so hard on it :'( . Shinee has now two albums and three EPs (thats even more than Girls' Generation who have only two albums and two EPs, and debuted one and a half year before Shinee). What is your opinion about a separate discography article? Will you help again? Reply please, I have watchlisted your page. Farjad0322 (talk) 09:39, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
I confirm that I would like to usurp de:User:Mx3 and ca:User:Mx3. エムエックスさん 話 15:11, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Before table-ising any more articles [1], I would ask that you take a moment and think about whether placing the content in table form is really value add to the project. See Wikipedia:TABLE#When_tables_may_not_be_appropriate and consider the trouble that new (and experienced!) editors have with the wiki table markup. Active Banana (talk) 17:51, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello Mx3. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of What a Girl Wants (4minute song), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A9 requires that the artist does not have an article and that there are no claims of importance/significance regarding the musical recording itself. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 19:51, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Although it is true that the song charted at #3 on the Gaon downloads chart, the chart is based on the best selling songs of each week, meaning various album tracks are eligible to chart. An example on this week's chart would be Taeyang's "I Need a Girl". It's at number five this week, but its position is based from downloads of that song from the album, which is why if you scroll down you can find "Just a Feeling" at #79 and "You're My" at #87 - both of which are also album tracks from Solar. Hope that helped! :) ~ Hayilim (talk) 21:38, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:O-Zone_at_Cerbul_de_Aur_in_2005.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
((di-replaceable fair use disputed))
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 12:57, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I know you meant well, but please don't delete dead links and replace with a cite-needed template, as you did here. From WP:DEADLINK, "Except for URLs in the External links section that have not been used to support any article content, do not delete a URL solely because the URL does not work any longer. Recovery and repair options and tools are available." The citation of a dead link, especially one with an accessdate, indicates that the statement that it supports has had support, and was checked by an editor. It also provides to later editors a suggestion of where the support had been found, which is helpful in case the link is gone due to a website reorganization or move. The preferred handling is to use the ((dead link)) template. WP:DEADLINK is nice how-to guide on marking and (even better) fixing broken links. Thanks for your work. TJRC (talk) 18:31, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi! Please participate in the discussion for criteria of listing at Talk:List of Korean musicians. Thanks! Farjad0322 (talk) 18:11, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Rock 'n' Roll Circus - Ayumi Hamasaki CD+DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
((bots|deny=DASHBot))
to your talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:50, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Round 1 is now over. The top 64 scorers have progressed to round 2, where they have been randomly split into eight pools of eight. At the end of April, the top two from each pool, as well as the 16 highest scorers from those remaining, will progress to round 3. Commiserations to those eliminated; if you're interested in still being involved in the WikiCup, able and willing reviewers will always be needed, and if you're interested in getting involved with other collaborative projects, take a look at the WikiWomen's Month discussed below.
Round 1 saw 21 competitors with over 100 points, which is fantastic; that suggests that this year's competition is going to be highly competative. Our lower scores indicate this, too: A score of 19 was required to reach round 2, which was significantly higher than the 11 points required in 2012 and 8 points required in 2011. The score needed to reach round 3 will be higher, and may depend on pool groupings. In 2011, 41 points secured a round 3 place, while in 2012, 65 was needed. Our top three scorers in round 1 were:
Other contributors of note include:
Featured topics have still played no part in this year's competition, but once again, a curious contribution has been offered by The C of E (submissions): did you know that there is a Shit Brook in Shropshire? With April Fools' Day during the next round, there will probably be a good chance of more unusual articles...
March sees the WikiWomen's History Month, a series of collaborative efforts to aid the women's history WikiProject to coincide with Women's History Month and International Women's Day. A number of WikiCup participants have already started to take part. The project has a to-do list of articles needing work on the topic of women's history. Those interested in helping out with the project can find articles in need of attention there, or, alternatively, add articles to the list. Those interested in collaborating on articles on women's history are also welcome to use the WikiCup talk page to find others willing to lend a helping hand. Another collaboration currently running is an an effort from WikiCup participants to coordinate a number of Easter-themed did you know articles. Contributions are welcome!
A few final administrative issues. From now on, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 01:02, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Niche Syndrome CD+DVD edition - ONE OK ROCK album cover.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξxplicit 05:38, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Sunrise.Sunset CD+DVD Cover.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
((di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>))
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξxplicit 05:40, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Crazy Loop - Web.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Oceanic Preservation Society (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:56, 16 August 2021 (UTC)