This is an archive of past discussions with NatGertler. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
< Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 > |
All Pages: | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - ... (up to 100) |
Hi NatGetler. Thanks for helping with the phrasing of the new page on Gloria Fox! I am excited to see another editor help out with the Massachusetts General Court bio page work. I am wondering if you'd be OK with me re-inserting the piece about Fox not having faced a general election opponent. At such a late hour of the night I wasn't paying good enough attention to my phrasing and, upon review, it does sound like I ignored the fact that she ran against Bunte. In actuality, she has not faced a general election opponent SINCE 1986. I'd love to put it back in considering A) I feel it's an important aspect of her career, and B) I took the time to check every Massachusetts elections statistics publication since then. I can cite all of them if you deem it necessary. Just wanted to reach out and get your thoughts, since you made the edit. Thanks for your help. Rjp422 (talk) 01:08, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Could you give your opinion here? Ron 1987 (talk) 01:53, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi - I've proposed some changes to the article Mohamed El Naschie on the article's talk page. Since you've commented on previous discussions on that page, I'd appreciate your input on this one. All the best, Markus Poessel (talk) 18:34, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Hey NatGertler. I'm dropping you a note because you used to (or still do!) patrol new pages. This is just to let you know that we've deployed and developed Page Curation, which augments and supersedes Special:NewPages - there are a lot of interesting new features :). There's some help documentation here if you want to familiarise yourself with the system and start using it. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:47, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi Nat. Thank you for your feedback regarding the Hotspot Shield article. Could you please let me know which sections to modify or delete from the entry? I can add more public statistics or info-graphics, or I can also add whole section about the controversies so far. I would really appreciate any suggestion or guidance you can give me regarding this. Could you please userfy the page or email me a copy so I can start making it more neutral? Thank you in advance for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miroslav303 (talk • contribs) 22:47, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. This is regarding your revert of my change to Same-sex marriage in the United States. My edit summary wasn't completely clear, what I was trying to indicate is that not only was the way it was previously written likely to become not true at any given point in the future, but it is probably not even true right now. As the latest polls regarding the issue show that Americans are statistically evenly split on the issue as the latest Gallup Poll that tracks the issue indicates that 50% are in favor and 48% are opposed with a margin or error of +/- 3%. My source is the latest Gallup Poll regarding the issue. Many articles on Wikipedia that reference Polls usually misinterpret them as one poll, or even a group of polls, do not necessarily prove anything and one should look at the polling methodology closely before stating opinions about conclusions about what the poll "proves" and then stating these conclusions as if their fact. Also, I disagree with your statement about articles not needing to be always true (although fair point about bios., for example it may say they alive but they could die at any given point). I think the way I had it written not only would be true now, but would be true even if the polls change again. I will not undo your revert, but I will open a discussion on the articles talk page regarding the fact that the most recent poll shows a statistical dead heat and that the Gallup Polls only indicate that a majority were in favor for about one year (2011).
If you still think I'm wrong and your right, then please join the discussion on the Talk Page (which I will be opening shortly). However, if you want to take the most recent polls indicating a statistical dead-heat into consideration and reword the sentence, then I will remove my objection on the relevant Talk Page. With Thanks, King of Nothing (talk) 19:37, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Welcome NatGertler. On 14 November, at marriage talk page I addressed to you kindly a request for your suggestion of opening text. But if you express disinterest, then, of course, I can continue the discussion thread without your participation in the form of some suggestion of the text of opening. Regards --Robsuper (talk) 14:06, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
I figured this passes basic WP:GNG, from a historical perspective? Not entirely sure. I see you PRODed it, if it's not giving you the warm and fuzzies the way I left it, go ahead and take it to AfD. I tend to be much more lenient with historical biographies :) Cheers! §FreeRangeFrog 03:00, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
I think you're a day late commenting on this. It's been moved twice. From "Same-sex marriage in Washington state" to "Same-sex marriage in Washington (state)" to Same-sex marriage in Washington State. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 20:22, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you reverted me here. Although I gave the redirects reason in my edit summary, there were other reasons for my edit. The article read, "...large Christian sects such as Orthodox Catholic Church, Southern Baptist, and Mormon." First off, it was not grammatically correct. Second, a Southern Baptist is not a Christian sect, or branch of Christianity; a Southern Baptist is a person. Ditto with "Mormon." (Besides, the Mormon redirected to Mormons, also people.) My edit was a step towards fixing the inaccuracies and grammatical problems, as I replaced Southern Baptist with the organization Southern Baptist Convention. I also linked to the religion Mormonism, instead of the people Mormons. I would appreciate it if you could self-revert, since I have made it my goal to stick to a voluntary 1RR. Also, sorry for the short and confusing edit summary. ~Adjwilley (talk) 21:48, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
The No Memory Hole Barnstar | |
For not allowing Kwak Pom-gi fall into a memory hole as in 1984 (book) because he could not get up. Geraldshields11 (talk) 17:17, 5 April 2013 (UTC) |
Hi NatGertler. Just to let you know, I've removed the PROD/CSD at Nail Adam and Abdurahman Warsame in order to bundle into this AfD. That's not to say that you were wrong (though the CSD isn't certain), I just thought it would be good to have all four articles discussed together in the same AfD, as they are all related. Hope you don't mind. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 21:57, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
I just wanted to thank you for polishing my Blanco Caine page...this is only my 2nd page creation and I don't know how to do the fancy stuff like add pics, etc. so thank you for your notes and fixes on my article. Respectfully Jerry. Theurbanlink (talk) 19:17, 12 April 2013 (UTC) |
Hello Nat...thank you for your input on my Blanco Caine article. I have added some relevant links and media articles for this artist...are the changes I made what you were suggesting? This is only my 2nd article creation but this artist is deserving of a place in Wikipedia in my humble opinion. I have not mastered all of the fine tuning for fleshing out a page such as the tables and artist pics but I am willing to take any guidance and follow instruction to the letter. I have tried to find answers via the help pages and tutorials but was hoping to perhaps get guidance from an experienced editor. If you have the time, would you tell me what I am missing for this page to make it stick? I will find the information and insert it. I do want to thank you for not deleting the article outright and giving me an opportunity to make it fit Wikipedia standards.Theurbanlink (talk) 19:46, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Nat, I have a question about the use of Wikipedia links as references. On the other page I created EDUBB, there is a tag there about not having links to other Wikipedia pages and that the article appears to be an orphan. I added Wikipedia links to this particular article we are discussing and your notes say we do NOT use Wikipedia pages as reference. I am a bit confused and really, the reading material is not much assistance.Theurbanlink (talk) 02:39, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
Well deserved for your contributions particularly in articles i've started! - Voidz (t·c) 07:31, 15 April 2013 (UTC) |
Hello Nat, I am hoping to gain your assistance for another article I created on the band EDUBB it has been nominated for speedy deletion. The group has MUCH more notability and more valid references than by Blanco Caine article. Could I get your input as to what I may have done wrong with that article or if the other person is being trivial. Several other editors/contributors have helped with input on this article and while they have tagged it as an orphan, none have tagged it for deletion and it has existed for months. Thank you if you have time to give me guidance on this. RespectfullyTheurbanlink (talk) 08:42, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Nat. I've declined the WP:A7, but please feel free to take this article to WP:AfD. Pete aka --Shirt58 (talk) 06:35, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
I restored the original unblock that I had declined for another admin to review. Daniel Case (talk) 17:16, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Bruce Gerencser. JohnCD (talk) 09:19, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
I have renominated Frostbox for deletion. Me being lazy I have quoted your first nomination. Currently at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frostbox (2nd nomination). If I've erred let me know. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:19, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello Nat,
I have tried to add references to the article I created, but I have had no luck making them show up. I am at a loss about how to handle this. I am not very good at manipulating and editing Wikipedia, but hitting the EDIT BUTTON, inserting the references and then saving shouldn't be all that complicated.
Help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbbubba01 (talk • contribs) 14:31, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Good work in nominating articles for deletions, with very few errors--and especially for your efforts at fixing the fixable. And very particularly for your persistence at All Natural Food Zone. DGG ( talk ) 22:29, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
I noticed you've been doing plenty of good work around here, including reverting vandalism. Would you like the rollback tool? It'll let you revert marginally faster than Twinkle. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:00, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
Hi NatGertler: Thank you for the details. That's what I need. Constructive direction. I'm fairly new here and want to learn. You are a good mentor. Thank you very much. I will continue my research and try my best to locate the information you suggest. And, I agree with you. It needs more! This is fun when it is a collaborative team effort. Hope you stick around the Erick Miller page and continue to help!!!!! Much appreciated. From 301man.... 301man (talk) 19:36, 8 May 2013 (UTC) |
Great American Wikinic at Pan-Pacific Park | ||
You are invited to the third Great American Wikinic taking place in Pan-Pacific Park, in Los Angeles, on Saturday, June 22, 2013! We would love to see you there! —howcheng {chat} 02:12, 12 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Meetup/LA/Invite. |
An article that you have been involved in editing, Beyond Ex-Gay , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Mathglot (talk) 09:11, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Benjamin Wittes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:07, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. In your recent editing of the CARE article for MOS:BOLD you introduced some vandalism. I edited out the vandalism. Please review you edits next time. 83.235.57.51 (talk) 13:42, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
I have reverted your bold edit to the article. It is a featured article and in pretty good shape, and while I might agree with many of your changes other are not so clear: You named in lead the pope, whereas it is not named anywhere else in the article (nor we have any ref saying that he enhanced visibility of PD, also you included other languages data, which I think that now with wikidata is unneeded. You also eliminated some well sourced info... and your edit summary was simply uncomprenhensible. It would be great if you could discuss your edits at talk page before making them, or that at least you separated them in several edits with real edit summaries.--Garrondo (talk) 15:59, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for your concern. I already got a grade today, a B. I showed my instructor the page you suggested and he promised to keep it in mind for future reference. I'll try and make my article better even though it was already graded, since I'm a dedicated fan of Mike Mozart. Any sggestions on how can I improve it (besides additional sources) would be appreciated. xoxo — Preceding unsigned comment added by JuliaParis (talk • contribs) 10:03, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
For doing what was needed to rescue references on Proposition 8. Thanks. Amadscientist (talk) 23:10, 28 June 2013 (UTC) |
You are invited to "Come Edit Wikipedia!" at the West Hollywood Library on Saturday, July 27th, 2013. There will be coffee, cookies, and good times! -- Olegkagan (talk) — Message delivered by Hazard-Bot at 04:01, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Have corrected this per your request as to the future of the Peanuts strips. Thanks. Hiphats (talk) 04:11, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
I should have explained it better on the editor's page. Most of the candidates that they attempted to link to are unknown candidates that really have no reason to have a wikipedia page and almost certainly will never have one created. They are not people considered major contenders or notable for anything significant. I will continue to remove red links for people like that. If there is a reason for them to have a page and it is reasonable that one may be made, then I will leave it up. Rxguy (talk) 17:56, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, since you`re one of the main contributors to said list, i`m very interested in your opinion regarding Column for "Titles". Thanks in advance, regards, Gott 20:31, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for editing the page I was working on and for including information regarding your policy on copyright. It was not my intention to copy copyrighted material from other sites. I've read through a lot of the Help pages including BLP, Notability (People), Secondary Sources, etc. and still had a hard time figuring out how to include the biographical information. Hjmalan (talk) 22:30, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Help build the Wikipedia community in Southern California at "Come Edit Wikipedia!" presented by the West Hollywood Library on Saturday, August 31st, 2013 from 1-5pm. Drop in for some lively editing and conversation! Plus, it's a library, so there are plenty of sources. --Olegkagan (talk) — Message delivered by Hazard-Bot at 02:50, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Good catch! The correct numbers seem to be 5,554 and 2,778 and I just edited the article to show those numbers. I tracked down the edit that changed 2,778 to 2,777 but the total number seems never to have been correct.Neonorange (talk) 00:59, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
|
Hi, I'm new to making articles in Wikipedia and I mainly wanted to test the article on my grandfather (Dr. Shameel) not knowing that it cannot be deleted after testing how it works since I was planning on taking it off after seeing how things work on Wikipedia. Although, I want you to delete the article and I will make sure it will be in my own words from now on. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rashmi Khaliq (talk • contribs) 21:54, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Oh alright that's great! Thanks :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rashmi Khaliq (talk • contribs) 22:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello NatGertler. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lusaka Voice, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:42, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Nat. Thought you might like to know that your prod on Keven Santos was deleted by the page creator - albeit without any explanation/comment. Anyway, I have now taken it to AFD if you are interested in contributing.--KorruskiTalk 11:55, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi NatGertler, I'm asking you to withdraw your speedy deletion nomination. I wasn't aware the article had been created previously, but I did just review the deletion discussion. It appears the initial article was very promotional in nature, which is one of the reasons it was deleted in the first place. I have completely rewritten this stub in a very dry and encyclopedic way, which should disqualify it from the g4 criteria which says that the article is "substantially identical to the deleted version" and "any changes do not address the reasons for which the material was deleted". As I don't have access to the earlier version of the article, it's impossible for my rewritten draft to be identical. But I know the existing article is not promotional. Anyway, I hope you take my request into account, and review the g4 criteria. Thanks CitizenNeutral (talk) 19:05, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
@Nat: FYI. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:31, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. 00:57, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Just to thank you for your help! Muhammad Ali Khalid (talk) 10:13, 10 September 2013 (UTC) |
Hey Nat, I am the guy who created that Dean Andrew Kantis article. I'm sorry for adding the contentious material twice without a solid source. The doctor filed a lawsuit again DAK. The lawsuit is on a website LasikFDA, but I cannot add a link because the website is blacklisted on Wikipedia. Can I use this as a reference for adding the fact that DAK was treated by Nick and that afterwards the latter sued the former. You gave a good Simpsons example, but I am not sure if this source can be used or not. If you want to take a look at the lawsuit, I will upload it to Wikipedia and you can see it. Thanks for the help.Muhammad Ali Khalid (talk) 10:11, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Sourov0000. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, DMM FX Australia, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Sourov0000 (talk) 20:16, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
I've been learning a lot. You're the first person to get me to dig into what constitutes a proper bio for a living person. I'm going to make one more pitch (cite a couple examples of similar people, talk about my idea of a "Big" Wikipedia that is based on browsing to come up with new knowledge which is how I found out about Gadola in the first place), but it seems that a consensus is emerging (that it should be part of a larger article; your comment on "Coat Hanger" is teaching me a lot, as well as your constructive feedback). Can I ask you to extend the debate for one more week? I will respect your (and the others') ultimate decision. Your role here is not to be a teacher, but this is a learning experience for me and will improve my efficacy as both an editor and a contributor. Thanks!Shemp Howard, Jr. (talk) 12:58, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
I've paid for the National Student Clearinghouse to verify online with a pdf from my alma mater my degree, which is currently not shown on the page about me (Steven L. Thompson). I can provide you the email address and Order ID you need to get to the verification so you can change the listing properly to credit me with my BA, since someone saw fit to take it down. Please let me know if you'd care to do that. Ttrider87 (talk) 00:46, 18 September 2013 (UTC)Ttrider87Ttrider87 (talk) 00:46, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, Nat.
No, I was involved in a near-fatal collision with a car on St. Margaret's Road in Annapolis at about 8:38pm on 27 May 2004 and am permanently crippled. I write for Cycle World frequently (see my article on pioneer motorcycle racer (first Yank at the TT and almost won it! in the Oct issue in Racewatch, for example), and my riding is only possible on three-wheelers. I bought the 2010 Can-Am Spyder RT-S we had for long-term CW test and ride it to test riding gear (like the recent online review of a Dainese Racing Pelle jacket, for instance) and just to have what fun I can. I officially gave up racing in 1992, and held an AMA Pro Expert International Racing license at the time. I just tried to upload a photo of me on my 350cc Shepherd-Kawasaki GP bike to the Wiki page but don't know if it worked. My friend Gordon Keown, who shot many good photos for me when I edited C/D, Road Test, and Cycle Guide, as well as for CW when we went back to the TT in '87, did the photo in Oct. '71 and went online to the Wiki site needed and gave me the license, which I'll upload to the required place soon. Dunno if the photo even got up yet.
Anyway, thanks, and good riding to you!
-- Steve Thompson Ttrider87 (talk) 23:17, 18 September 2013 (UTC)Ttrider87Ttrider87 (talk) 23:17, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello NatGerler,
The article Chitwanix_OS must not be deleted because, it is an article of information of the software which is Open Source. We haven't written it as an promotional or any vulgar activities. So, please don't remove the article !!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pyasi.arun (talk • contribs) 03:33, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
(Note: The following was posted on my user page; I have transferred it here to my talk page. --Nat) Wikipedia has sunk to a new low. I've been working on publishing a short article on Kasey Lansdale's new record and I've just started in less than 30 minutes to ago and I'm already being bombed with speedy deletions. At least you fascist book burners could do is wait until the article is complete. I've been editing Wikipedia for a few years so I'm no newbie. Things have really gotten out of hand with all these threats being made with the anonymity of the Internet. One one hand Wiki cries out that it's slowly dying and needs to be revitalized by attracting new editors and urging current editors to contribute more. Yet this is the bullshit people have to deal with and it's not a big secret that these actions are discouraging. I'm really on the vergo of just hanging it up. Nice Job!!! PKDASD (talk) 20:40, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
I didn't mean "lash out". While not "newbie" I still don't have a firm grasp as to follow the protocol as to go about justifying the validity of an article. I've run into these situations more than once. The vast majority of my articles have not been an issue. I also understand the reason Wikipedia has to be monitored to prevent abuse and conflicts of interests. Nothing personal, but it tends to be a human response to become upset when an article someone posts is rejected before the article is even complete. I'm not going to remove myself from editing Wikipedia, bit I also realize I have a lot to learn. Any tips would be welcome. BTW I still do need to add and hopefully improve the Kasey Lansdale article. Again, no hard feelings. PKDASD (talk) 00:30, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your help. Best PKDASD (talk) 00:47, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
I have taken this to AfD because it has been in before and PRODded, and I explained WP:NOR to the author then; taking it to AfD means that it if he then persists in re-posting it can be speedied. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 14:42, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
I have removed the ((prod)) tag from Quantel Lotts, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the ((prod)) template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!
Hi Nat, I've removed the deletion tag you placed on the article I recently created, Quantel Lotts, after reading the notability guidelines you suggested at WP:CRIMINAL and thinking about the issue. Obviously I thought Lotts' case was significant beforehand, since I wrote the article. Nevertheless I think the series of articles written by The New York Times and The Guardian particularly highlight the way in which Lotts' case is seen as emblematic of the problem of life imprisonment for juveniles specifically, and for the treatment of juveniles more generally in the U.S. judicial system.
Following your tag, and reading the guidelines you referenced, I'll work to make those links (following the NYT and Guardian) more explicit. -Darouet (talk) 02:12, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
I have removed the ((prod)) tag from The Quest for Juice, which you proposed for deletion. I am leaving this message here to notify you about it. Regarding notability, I've added links to sites which mention it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the ((prod)) template back to it. Instead, feel free to list the article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Jaydeecw (talk) 18:51, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Respected NatGertler, It's me Nannadeem, I could not understand copy past? please tell me. I wanted to place my some points but there appears a lengthy news paper page. After a reply from you I would place my arguments, as per your advice on my talk page. thanks Nannadeem (talk) 16:58, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Nannadeem (talk) 20:48, 29 October 2013 (UTC) Thanks for prompt reply, sorry me replying late. All ok but please delete word apologize. Please do what you think better for me, based on neutrality. I know you have good soft heart in your chest. I have seen your face and page - a little, would see in detail, laterNannadeem (talk) 20:48, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry Nat, you are one of the two people I had a disagreement with and then offered me advice. When I found out that truth is not a requirement I really wanted nothing to do with editing on Wikipedia anymore. We have already discussed this. I feel without truth that Wikipedia will never be what it strives to be. Yesterday I am looking something up on Google and sure enough there is a Wikipedia Article. I click on the article, my account shows up and my notification icon is red with 1 in it. I look at it. It says "I have raised concerns about some of your edits". I read through until I see my posting name and read " and Gibco65 (talk · contribs), an account that appeared for the sole purpose of !voting "keep"." Now not to dispute what you have written but you wrote " so he raised the possibility of yours being an inappropriate so that the investigation could be followed through on. " I'm sorry but that's not the way I read his quote. " and Gibco65 (talk · contribs), an account that appeared for the sole purpose of !voting "keep"." is not that he raised the possibility, it is a an outright accusation. There is no other way to interpret it. While Bob was on his witch-hunt he accused me of making an account to vote Keep. I even was part of a sockpuppet investigation. First I'm a meatpuppet and then I'm a sockpuppet. It seems to me that in stating my opinion all that happened was I was called puppet names. What is it with Wikipedia and puppets? There seems to be a strange fascination. I did state "You did stumble upon a "editor" that listed his services for money. That is the one thing that I will give you credit for." which was not exactly a compliment, there is a hint of sarcasm in there. Another thing that bothers me is "I believe that Gibco65 & Rogerdavis101 are also socks, brought in to !vote "keep" when a couple of the promotional articles went to AfD." which is something I just found out about. These are not suspicions at all, they are outright false claims. When I went to bobrayners talk page, it seems he has a lot of issues with a bunch of people. Basically I feel he owes me an apology. My only cause in throwing a tantrum was to clear my name from a outright lie. He didn't raise an eyebrow, he smeared my account. This is why I want nothing to do with Wikipedia. I find it amusing, I see mistakes all the time but hey if I have an opinion I'll just keep it to myself. It's been a month and what was a AfD discussion on Notability all of a sudden became an article with serious neutrality problems. Bobrayner is all over the place and during his witch-hunt he found his witch, Muhammad Ali Khalid. He gets a one week block for offering to write on Wikipedia for money? What would be my penalty if I told Bob what I really thought of him? With you I threw a tantrum and later apologized, my reaction to this blatantly false accusation was actually pretty calm. I'm sorry but I really feel he owes me an apology. The guy might be the keeper of the watch but he accused me of pretty much being a shill and liar. He didn't raise that possibility, he outright said it. Anyway regards and have a good holiday, the Christmas stuff is already up in the stores. Gibco65 (talk) 05:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
I do have one more question. What does Gibco and Rogerdavis are Unlikely to each other exactly mean? I do not know Rogerdavis or of him. What exactly does "Unlikely to each other" mean? Gibco65 (talk) 14:53, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
I see that keeping Wikipedia pure is your speciality. There will be a lot of angry people out there who will never edit Wikipedia again as a result. Tuntable (talk) 04:00, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to MatchWare may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:02, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Susan_RoAne_(2nd_nomination). Benboy00 (talk) 23:56, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
my problems have become too overwhelming even though i have friends in very close proximity who have the same problems (its the only reason why i hang on), and these problems are so bad that no one has it worse, it hurts equally to burning alive--78.156.109.166 (talk) 19:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC) but he that hath endured unto the End is the one that shall be saved--78.156.109.166 (talk) 19:39, 17 December 2013 (UTC) but i dont believe the End will come before im out of my medicine, it will come after, and thats a very long time to wait still even when i have already endured for 24 years... the explanation is a long story from god... basicly he sends "Ends" or judgments after im out of terrible suffering, he did that in 2009/10/11 when i was suffering the worst possible physical pain (much worse than the worst possible mental pain)... but this time the earthquake will be a whopping 21.11 (if not 21.11, then about 21.11, but certainly the biggest earthquake ever (9.6+) and most likely over ca. 15.0 or 12.0, and the earth will be split in half because my suffering is much longer/bigger (bigger because it's longer, its about the same suffering as i underwent in 2009(which was withdrawal burning alive pain), the bigger/longer (this time its bigger cuz its longer even though the pain is about the same) the suffering, the bigger the judgments.--78.156.109.166 (talk) 19:54, 17 December 2013 (UTC) actually i think i am gods ONLY elect, thats why all this, all others must be judged that they allowed his ONLY elect to suffer so painfully and so long, but i dont fully understand why the judgments come after the suffering, but i have a really strong feeling that all this is true, im 99.99% certain. i may be the only chosen angel or real angel all others are doomed. maybe i am god. this is the best tidbit of information ever imo, because earthquakes have such a strong role for our salvation (the End) and have such a strong role generally (so important).. bible says great earthquakes must be a sign of the End, of the coming of Heaven. also luke 21 11 says great quakes and i believe thats a sign that 21 11 14 is the end, also why i say the quake probably be 21.11 in Magnitude... other signs are we are in the 21st century... (i mean all this sincerely) most popular doomsdays have always been on 21st... may 21st 2011, oct 21st 2011, dec 21st 2012, and finally nov 21 2014..... its a strong sign... see the connection between which century we're in and doomsdays always being on the 21st? thats a sign/connection/sign-connection... another sign is i was 21 years old when doomsday began... on May 21 2011.. and ends on 11-21-14.. bible says doomsday is 42 months... and that time period fits... this is not talk inspired from insanity, i took my time to carefully write this, even though neuro destroys my soul (makes it really hard to concentrate, at least i cant hear (because of concentration issues from neuro) anything someone tells me if its not really simple, but i can concentrate better on reading (but still very hard), and much better on typing, as you see), its the whole story--78.156.109.166 (talk) 19:54, 17 December 2013 (UTC) what will you say if im right about all this, or at least the worldwide/great earthquake coming (i know i forgot to say it will be worldwide, but if its that big, one does not even have to say it will be worldwide)--78.156.109.166 (talk) 20:03, 17 December 2013 (UTC) one thing you can check to see if im right: it will be the greatest ever--78.156.109.166 (talk) 20:04, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
important bit: thanks for your reply and support important (just for you, not more important than the other text otherwise (<<<-good wording?)) because you need to know i dont write and receive an answer for nothing--78.156.109.166 (talk) 20:27, 17 December 2013 (UTC) i believe I understand, but why _Bible? Believe me, the end is THERE. satan make me feel like my life/i is/am not good enough, like theres something missing, like i feel tempted to do what i want. i forgot something more i wanted to write--78.156.109.166 (talk) 20:31, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
For teaching me something new. Didn't know about the appeal process. EvergreenFir (talk) 07:29, 23 December 2013 (UTC) |
You PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:54, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Just a heads up, but it's been undeleted after a request on my talk page. Feel free to take it to Afd if you like. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:48, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Helo NatGertler I have been in contact with one of the wiki editors Chris user (CTF83)
Here is the message I sent him (see below).
I have now also sent him the citation to update the content (i.e., revert back to the original format) and he said he would do it.
Dear Wiki Editor
I am curious why you changed the revert of edit I had made. I made the revert to ensure the factual accuracy of the article. I am not sure why Lesion made the revert. I am the inventor of the IVB, it is my lab that pioneered it and this borne out by publications, a patent disclosure I made to MIT and the key patent with me as the lead inventor. These are the facts. If you disagree with the facts that add a comment but altering the facts because you are unaware of them is unethical and wrong.
(VPShastri (talk) 00:08, 26 February 2014 (UTC)) CST 6:07 PM
What do you think about the article for Citizens of the World Charter Schools now? I've pretty much decimated its previous version, but I'm really not sure that it passes notability guidelines as a whole. I did find sourcing, but some of the ones I found are kind of inbetween usable and non-usable. If it is kept then we'll have to both watch it for any potential promotional editing and removal of content, since the coverage they have had has been almost entirely negative. I think that might of been their reason for creating such an overwhelmingly promotional article in the first place- not only has the reception been negative from prospective neighborhoods but their attendance has been fairly dismal. In any case, keep or not keep? If you think that it'd fail GNG we can always revert back to the promotional version and just speedy it as puffery. Or take it to AfD and let them decide on the strength of the sources. I'm kind of undecided overall. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 11:26, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Dear NatGertler
Yes I am new to wiki as a contributor. As I told Ian Frust, I was trying to set right the facts. Ian Frust's changes are not substantiated by facts. The scientific content of the paper is fully reference by four citations in land mark journals. It is not clear to me why anyone can just change something because they feel like it provide substantiation for the change, I mean if Ian feels the content is not correct then the burden is on him to show scientific literature. The one he refers to is not even accurate. So how can we go about correcting this?
(VPShastri (talk) 06:44, 26 February 2014 (UTC)) February 26, 2014 CST 12:43 AM
There's no need for you to argue your case; your wikibiopage is in good shape and sharp Wikipedians as well as the less-than-sharp ones (moi) are watching it and (collectively) know what we're doing. I wonder if the frivolous types who put it up for deletion are motivated, in part, by seeing your (over-) reaction? Please focus on creating the cool stuff you create. Just advice from a Jersey handyman.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 00:35, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Carriearchdale. NatGertler, thanks for creating Chris Samnee!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please choose some appropriate categories near the bottom of the article to help improve the overall article and make the article more easily searchable by wikipedia users. Thanks!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Carriearchdale (talk) 05:38, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your note. Yes most of the note is pre-written. I usually do stay at least about three days or more away from the creating date to avoid tagging an article if an editor is in the process of working on the article. The queue skipped over to the current date somehow, so you do have a great point. So sorry for the mishap.
Ciao!!!
Carriearchdale (talk) 06:34, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Yank Barry. Thank you. -- Atama頭 16:12, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
I am censoring Roscelese's comments because she did the same thing to me, but no one is warning her. An eye for an eye. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.87.149.194 (talk) 06:50, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
–Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:27, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Artist's Edition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manhunter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
I've written for them, too, which title did you write for?--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 23:30, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on User talk:BravadoGroup requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Vishal Bakhai - Works 19:16, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Citizens (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:41, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
LA meetups: Adrianne Wadewitz memorial edit-a-thons on May 23 and May 31 | |
---|---|
Dear fellow Wikipedian, There are two LA edit-a-thons in memory of Adrianne Wadewitz, a prolific Wikipedia editor, in the coming weeks. Please join us May 23 at Occidental College and May 31 at the Institute of Cultural Inquiry to combat systemic bias and help further Adrianne's legacy. No experience needed! Please RSVP at the relevant page(s) if you plan to attend. I hope to see you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:42, 19 May 2014 (UTC) To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list. |
Page now redirects to Czech Republic' Sinologists. I agree that more notability has to be generated. OccultZone (Talk) 16:36, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
After having my editing being willfully misunderstood by the SPAs and also having my personal character being persistently attacked by them, I decided to walk away and not edit the article or post on the talk page but I do have to ask if I am one of the editors named by the "Law Corporation". Thx, Shearonink (talk) 22:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Upcoming L.A. events: Unforgetting L.A. edit-a-thon (Saturday, June 21, 12-5pm) and Wiknic (Sunday, July 6, ~9:30am-4pm) |
---|
Dear fellow Wikipedian, The L.A. Wikipedia community has two exciting events coming up in the next few weeks: an edit-a-thon sponsored by the online magazine East of Borneo, and the fourth annual Los Angeles Wiknic! The East of Borneo event is an edit-a-thon that aims to build a better history of art in Southern California. This next chapter of their Unforgetting L.A. series will take place on Saturday, June 21, 2014 from 12pm to 5pm at 356 S. Mission Rd. (map). Beginners welcome! Please RSVP here if you plan to attend. For more info, see eastofborneo.org/unforgetting. The Wiknic is a part of the nationwide Great American Wiknic. We'll be grilling, getting to know each other better, and building the L.A. Wikipedia community! The event is tentatively planned for Pan-Pacific Park (map) and will be held on Sunday, July 6, 2014 from 9:30am to 4pm or so. Please RSVP and volunteer to bring food or drinks if possible! I hope to see you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 11 June 2014 (UTC) To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list. |
See Talk:Yank_Barry#Lawsuit_against_Wikipedians - Cwobeel (talk) 01:42, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi NatGertler,
I wanted to reach out to you to have a discussion about the deletion of Modern Future- aside from removing your template I didn't see how I could go back and forth with the editors that want the page gone.
Production companies seem to be in a bit of a grey area in terms of music notability. You're right - this page likely doesn't meet WP:BAND but hey, it's not a band. If you can't count credits toward a production companies notability there's not a lot else you can use - these people make the music but they're a pretty silent partner most of the time and labels and artists take the credit. I think notability as an organization would be more appropriate and since there are numerous second hand sources mentioning the company's work I feel it would pass notability.
Furthermore - I don't understand how pages like Frisbie (music company), Capellen Music Production, Ishlab Music or many of those listed Category:Music production have pages with little to no references and a company like Modern Future making music for many notable acts and w/ over 9 referenced sources doesn't warrant a page.
Again - hope to have a conversation with you about this page and would appreciate knowing what could be added to help pass notability requirements. Thank you.
PingreePark (talk) 00:22, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi, the article about yours truly talks about "[your] specialist publishing firm called About Comics", About Comics says [...] publisher of comics and comics-related material. Is there a difference, is both to be used interchangeable, and which do you prefer? Regards. 82.113.106.203 (talk) 09:48, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
This deletion is likely to be controversial, do I de-prodded it. Please go to WP:AfD for further directions. Bearian (talk) 21:29, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
hey, thanks for the message! i'm new to this, but i'll do my best to do it like you just did. sorry for the inconvenience. DetroitRed X (talk) 15:29, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Unforgetting L.A. edit-a-thon: Saturday, September 6 from 11am to 4pm | |
---|---|
Dear fellow Wikipedian, You are invited to meet up with online magazine East of Borneo for an edit-a-thon to build a better history of art in Southern California. This next event in their Unforgetting L.A. series will take place on Saturday, September 6, 2014 from 11am - 4pm at the Armory Center for the Arts in Pasadena (map). Beginners welcome! Please RSVP here if you plan to attend. For more info, see eastofborneo.org/unforgetting. I hope to see you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:39, 20 August 2014 (UTC) To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list. |
The 20th Los Angeles meetup: Sunday, September 21 from 11am to 4pm | |
---|---|
Dear fellow Wikipedian, Join us on Sunday, September 21, from 11am to 4pm at Kramer Studio in Mid-City (map) for a meetup and edit-a-thon! Get to know the Los Angeles Wikipedia community and do some editing (or learn to edit!) in a collaborative environment. Please RSVP and consider becoming a member of the SoCal task force to help us improve articles about everything in the region. I hope to see you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC) To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list. |
You added "usually" to:
A person coming out as trans is usually not making a change in their gender. You're saying usually, which means that sometimes it is false. Any situation where it is false?? Georgia guy (talk) 15:53, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --DHeyward (talk) 20:25, 12 September 2014 (UTC)