Archives

1

Nothing to say. es:Usuario:OscarFercho

As you have spoken against the Marvel Super Hero Adventures: Frost Fight on the talk page for List of films based on Marvel Comics, I am inviting you to take part in this Article for Deletion here --Rtkat3 (talk) 14:55, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with the edit you made to Batman in film, but I wanted to let you know that it technically is a reboot. It doesn't have to be an origin story to be a reboot. It just has to be a re-start of the Batman franchise in a new universe with a new cast (which it is). That's why Spider-Man: Homecoming is considered a reboot of a reboot of the Spider-Man franchise, even though it isn't an origin story.

The film would only have to be an origin story if it were a remake of Batman Begins (which it isn't). The difference between a remake and a reboot is that a remake restarts the franchise by retelling the same story of the original (such as Halloween, Psycho, A Nightmare On Elm Street, ETC). A reboot restarts the franchise, but with a new story (such as Dredd, Batman Begins, Friday the 13th, ETC). However, the terms "reboot" and "remake" are sometimes used interchangeably. DarkKnight2149 02:29, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. but I'm disagree, I think that a reboot it's, essentially, a retelling history, that's no the case of the last iteration of Batman, but fine, I believe that Batman of DCEU must be not considered a reboot version.OscarFercho (talk) 02:47, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we can agree to disagree. Besides, if there's ever a conflicting edit, we can always create a consensus at the Wikiproject. DarkKnight2149 15:12, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That is.OscarFercho (talk) 15:35, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of the user's personal opinion/definition of what a reboot is - the DCEU version of Batman is indeed a rebooted version of the character. Simple as that.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 03:08, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This question is in the past, I don't know what problem now.OscarFercho (talk) 06:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Simply commenting on other threads, where you have exhibited similar behavior. You opinions do not change factual information, User:OscarFercho. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 14:42, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OscarFercho. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Mummy (franchise), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Newell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion, on the MCU TV Series Talk Page, regarding whether the show Marvel's New Warriors has been confirmed as being MCU or not. The discussion is currently largely about the executive's quote in response to the "Marvel likes to say that "everything is connected"... interview question in the following Hollywood Reporter article. [1]. Please share your thoughts if you wish. -AnonWikiEditor (talk) 22:33, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A request to change the title and content of a comics article has begun at Talk:X-Men (film series)#Requested move 7 April 2017. Any interested WikiProject:Comics editor may comment there within one week. --Tenebrae (talk) 01:51, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And here, Black Kite Tenebrae is tainting and invalidating his own RfC movement by Wp:CANVASSing to users who are not A)Doing so in a central location (i.e. the RfC list, though it is there) B)Notifying editors that are not mentioned in nor involved in the discussion prior to his notices, and C)By Spamming.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 02:23, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I need you to be aware of this. Big Hero 6 the animated movie has no affiliation with Marvel. No Marvel subsidiaries were involved with the production of the feature film. If you look at the production and distribution of the movie, it's by Walt Disney Animation Studios and Walt Disney Pictures. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 13:54, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was announced over a month ago that he was no longer writing Episode 9. Jack Thorne was brought in to re-write the script and this is one of the things that led to his departure. "According to the Hollywood Reporter, Kennedy and Trevorrow were divided over script issues and writer Jack Thorne ("Wonder") had recently been hired to work on the story." I cant imagine with him being fired they will go with his script as they already had brought in Thorne. http://collider.com/star-wars-9-new-writer-jack-thorne/

Jason1978 (talk) 09:10, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your question, I removed the reference from Venom's pre-production because it is not connected to Spider-Man: Homecoming nor the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

Cineplex (talk) 9:17PM, September 28, 2017

So then, We need a better reference, but the preproduction has started.OscarFercho (talk)

Hello, OscarFercho. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Do you know why The_Exorcist_(film) is not on this section? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-grossing_films#Timeline_of_highest-grossing_films. Greetings from Chile --Jbaranao (talk) 23:50, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure it was OK to remove the upcoming films from List of films based on DC Comics? Admittedly, if they were to be kept, the list was still incomplete, but I was going to add the other films. My plan was this: I'd like to add all upcoming films to the DC list, properly referenced.

When you reverted my edits, you even removed a few 2020 films that I had added in the list too.

List of Walt Disney Pictures films has quite a lot of upcoming films at the end of the list, with references, with and without release dates. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 15:04, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please, use the talk page of the List. It's just wait, for now, any upgrade of the slate of Warner.OscarFercho (talk) 15:08, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, admittedly, I didn't check the talk page before adding the films and I apologize if this caused any problems. Alright, I'll use the talk page for further comments. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 15:31, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You repeatedly revert edits regarding John Francis Daley & Jonathan Goldstein as directors of Flashpoint. The sources provided state that they are in negotiations to direct the film. This means a contractual obligation/relationship with the studio has begun. That means they are hired. Your 'over and over again' and 'they are in talks' nonsense has no validity. "In talks" is a slang/fan-boy term that basically means rumors or consideration. That's incorrect on all accounts. The filmmakers confirmed their role on their social media page. There is no reason to revert those edits.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 08:19, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The report cited from Vatiety, it's about talks, negotiations, the same like John Francis Daley cited. They are not contracted yet.OscarFercho (talk) 13:43, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:OscarFercho, you are directly and purposefully WP:WARring with User:DisneyMetalhead. The latter has cited a source multiple times that includes the director acknowledging their involvement in the project. You are nitpicking by stating that anything else is required and by reverting the edits repetitively. With the director acknowledging/confirming the attachment to the film - what else is needed?! The source is valid enough. --206.81.136.61 (talk) 01:05, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:OscarFercho as the previous editor pointed out you are edit warring... when there is enough evidence that is reliable for edits --- why do you continuously revert these edits? If you honestly need something more than the director confirming his involvement, then there will be a source stating the studio's confirmation added when it is stated. However, when it comes directly from one of the co-directors, I don't see the issue.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 03:01, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, yeah, and where's the directors confirmation of their involvement? Negotiations are not the same as an officila attachement.OscarFercho (talk) 06:11, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:OscarFercho - You continue to edit war on this page. Even your response to my previous comment^ is combative. Doing so is against Wikipedia regulations. You need to discuss edits that are in conflict with sources and/or the general consensus of other editors. You reverted an edit done earlier even though the two sources were reliable, only to finally read one and decide that one source is "reliable". You do not WP:OWN this page nor any other page. Be collaborative, and understand that there are multiple sources that are classified as reliable when doing edits to pages on Wikipedia. I'm glad you finally agree with the sources that state who the directors of Flashpoint are.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 14:33, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It appears as though this is common among your edits as seen here. Other editors are trying to help you in your edits, by keeping Wikipedia clean and consistent. As User:TheWolfChild pointed out, you cannot delete sources and edits just because you believe they are unreliable. It's against Wikipedia policy. Take to discussion boards and talk pages when you disagree.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 14:39, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not here for glad to anyone.OscarFercho (talk) 14:45, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:OscarFercho, you continue to flippantly delete information and references, while you never provide sources for your edits. If you're going to edit a paragraph namely this one, please do so with complete and proper English as this is an Encyclopedia and needs to be correct. Secondly - stop deleting confirmed information. You did so here. If you continue this behavior, this will be brought to the attention of admins, in order to protect the page. Please be collaborative and discuss your arguments on Talk:DC Extended Universe before you delete or add anything else to this page. --DisneyMetalhead (talk) 02:52, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greg Berlanti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stargirl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the whole "unreliable source" thing on the list of television series based on Marvel Comics. Do you want me to put the X-Force series back but without the source? I don't want to be untrustworthy. --The Iron Warrior (talk) 01:25, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Use the talk page of the List, please.OscarFercho (talk) 03:19, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I undid the revision again because the way it was says all films in the chart are in the DCEU unless otherwise specified, and none of the non-DCEU films specify that they aren't, which would imply that things like the original Superman and batman films are in the DCEU....which is incorrect. If you want the format with the comment above the chart to be accurate, you would need to go to each section and add 'not in DCEU' for every movie prior to Man of Steel. That's fine, but without doing that it's stating all of the films are in the DCEU. Please see talk page on the DCEU live action film page for more on this. Thank you. --Stevehim (talk) 21:30, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OscarFercho. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you reverted my changes to this page. I think that the organizational structure that I proposed is sensible, so let me explain why. First, the page as you would prefer it is not parallel between the live-action and animated sections. There is a section for theatrically released films within the section for animated films, but no such section heading for live-action films. If you look at the table of contents, live-action television films have their own first-level section heading, but animated television films are combined with direct-to-video films as a second-level heading in the animation section. This is confusing that the level of headings switches around based on whether the film is live-action or animated. Second, you seemed to take issue with separating films released in the U.S. from those that were only released elsewhere or not released at all. There is a very sensible reason for doing this. All of these films were produced by companies in the United States and therefore would be expected to receive a U.S. release. In the United States, a domestic release is considered one where the film is shown in North America, which almost always means the United States and possibly Canada. Films produced in the United States that do no receive a domestic release, but are shown in a small list of other countries, are seen as being "dumped" without the confidence of the studio behind it. These films have more in common with direct-to-video films than they do with films that received a domestic theatrical release. I see you linked to a thread where the issue of separating these films was discussed before, and noticed that you were initially in favor of separation. Only three other reviewers besides yourself participated when this was brought up five years ago, which hardly seems like overwhelming support, particularly since this list has gotten considerably longer since then. If the issue is that people keep adding in films that only received an international release, then these entries can be left in the list with code so it doesn't display along with a note that the film appears elsewhere on the page. I am in favor of restoring my edits and letting people who don't want separate sections for those live-action films raise the issue again on the talk page explaining why it is better to collapse across these sections. Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 20:16, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You. Better is a new sumbmit and discussion for to know a real current consensous.OscarFercho (talk) 02:18, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is important to consider that the sections exist for how many films there are, and its exposure, not just reflects same sections of another lists. That, and Northamerica it's not all the wolrd, its a primary market, but not the only one, that's couldn't be a parameter.OscarFercho (talk) 02:28, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Oscar Fercho,

There is a discussion taking place at Talk:Spider-Man: Far From Home where some wiki editors are debating whether to change the film's title to 'Far from Home' instead of its current title 'Far From Home' (lowercase the second f). I opposed this, but there are many who support this change. Would you like to add your two cents to the discussion? Cardei012597 (talk) 19:01, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me to edit a page title List of television series and films based on Image Comics publications please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackknight1234567890 (talk • contribs) 20:50, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me to edit a page title List of television series and films based on Image Comics publications — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackknight1234567890 (talk • contribs) 21:05, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help to edit List of television series based on Marvel Comics please. Blackknight1234567890 (talk) 15:50, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly what yo need?OscarFercho (talk) 00:30, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi OscarFercho,

please take a moment to have a look at the edit warring policy again.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:57, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]