This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

It appears the Infobox Christian leader has <br> and <small> tags in the template. Same case as Template talk:Infobox officeholder#Formatting of name & honorifcs. Can do the proposing on the talk page? Looks like the bot run for Infobox officeholder took care of most articles. See John Joseph O'Connor (cardinal) for an example. Bgwhite (talk) 08:41, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM – Volume III, Issue II, February 2013 Headlines Australia and New Zealand report: Library Conferences and Regional Workshops Finland report: Kiasma Edit-A-Thon; Theme Days France report: Wikipedia in public libraries; Borrowing books from public libraries; POTY Germany report: Reach out for cooperation Kosovo report: Wiki Academy Kosovo Mexico report: Wikimedia México turns green and goes to radio Netherlands report: War Monuments in the Netherlands Spain report: Viquimodernisme, from the classrom to Wikipedia Sweden report: Databases and image donations Switzerland report: Wickiana and History of Alps UK report: GLAM-Wiki 2013 preparation USA report: GLAM in the USA Open Access report: Interview; WikiProject Open Access News; Open Access Media Importer Calendar: March's GLAM events Read this edition in full • Single-page To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

You may be interested in this discussion, as it involves citing a source you authored. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 16:32, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Penns Hall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crossroads (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:11, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Ditto the header. Nyttend (talk) 06:39, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I would like to do some forward planning.--ClemRutter (talk) 21:18, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Was just reading up on authority control and the authority control template. This sounds like something I could help with. Can anyone insert authority control templates in articles, or is this all done by some sort of bots or a specialized group of contributors? •••Life of Riley (T–C) 19:36, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Anyone can, and you'd be welcome. A bot was run to populate the bulk of relevant articles, but that was a one off. Obviously, it's important to double check that you have the right person's AC data, and not that for a namesake. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:39, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Pigsonthewing. You have new messages at Talk:Peter_Planyavsky.
Message added 03:17, 13 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Nikkimaria (talk) 03:17, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Interesting course.Reneef57 (talk) 10:47, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello, this is vanbed76. Vanbed76 (talk) 10:47, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Have you picked this user name due to work experiences? Aed001 (talk) 10:47, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi Andy, how are you? CWilky1 (talk) 10:47, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

It is good to catch up with you again. Paul2point0 (talk) 10:47, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello,this is the best training course I have been on. Adoyle123 (talk) 10:47, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Howdo!

Hello Andy, How are you doing? Codd bottle (talk) 15:06, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello from sunny Preston

So far so good ... although think I should have come to the morning one when brain cells were a bit brighter. SEASHWORTH (talk) 15:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello

Hi. Hipstorian (talk) 15:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello

Hello Flying Pig, I'm enjoying the training. Bluedovetail (talk) 15:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Training

Very interesting training, thank you, Susan. Susan Gleave (talk) 15:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello

Thanks for the course today Jhayward001 (talk) 15:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for today

Thanks Andy for the training at Ludlow today. Much appreciated! KateMuse (talk) 11:38, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello

Of all the training courses I've been on this month, this is the first. AJPXIV (talk) 11:38, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello

Hello from Ludlow. Peter Reavill 11:38, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello

There is certainly a lot about the back-end of Wikipedia that I knew nothing about! Dr.k.hardman (talk) 11:38, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello from Lud

Ta for today. Daniel Ludlow (talk) 11:39, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

thanks so far Andy

what beer. BeesWin (talk) 11:39, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi there from Lud

Many thanks for the interesting course. JackieLMRC (talk) 11:51, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

How do you feel about data in a potential infobox vs. the quite elaborate navbox ((Richard Wagner))? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:58, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

The navbox already has some metadata; however navboxes contain less information (and thus less metadata) abut the person (o other subject) than the infobox. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:31, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Did you look at his navbox? It has A LOT. I wonder about repetition, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:36, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

It's probably too long for some people. You could trim or remove "years active", "notable works" or "influenced". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:51, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

I would remove "influenced" first, while the notable works should be seen on top, and years of activity are not in the navbox, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:50, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Robert Stoepel has an infobox now, Wagner is in my sandbox, see above, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:06, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

ps: Graham Waterhouse, Philip Glass --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:09, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

[EC] Those look good (Glass needs to use ((flatlist)) and ((plainlist)), but that's relatively minor). Meanwhile, unfortunately, some editors are still systematically removing infoboxes from articles, citing "WP:COMPOSERS", contrary to the findings of the classical music projects' RfC. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:41, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Glass was not by me ;) - I will add a few, - I started several composers who never saw that "please don't ..." - which is no more than a request anyway --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:50, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

In the context: for classical composers, there's often not only a place of study, but also important teachers in specific topics, - thinking of Graham Waterhouse's teachers for cello and composition at three distinct universities. It would be much better to place the teachers to the so-called Alma Maters than under "influenced". Ideas? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:46, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

I'd be inclinded to put them under influenced, as "John Doe (teacher at Juliard)" or suchlike. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:16, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

That's what we have, that's what gets disputed on Classical music, - bottomline: "known for" and "influenced" are subjective and not wanted at all. Teachers, however, are objective. - I looked at creating a different template "classical music person" but find "person" so complicated that I stepped back, at least for now. I looked at "artist" for an example, which has "Work" and "Spouse", which I would like much better than "Notable work(s)" and "Spouse(s)". You mentioned those are perennial questions, - would it be possible to have different appearances? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:39, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

If someone isn't influenced by their teacher, then that teacher isn't worth mentioning in their biography. Nonetheless, the issues you raise would best be debated and decided on the talk pages of ((Infobox person)) or (once the current furore has died down) MOS:Infobox. We need more consistency between infoboxes, not less; and we shouldn't fork (or create new-) infoboxes because we haven't resolved a problem with or disagreement over what we already have. I miss Br'er... Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:47, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

helped, thank you --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:50, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

ps: Orchestra infobox: proposal, another fork? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:42, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Philip Glass was changed to "person, and not by me ;) - Wagner (and others) : is there a way to point from the infobox to the navbox, which really contains a lot that should not be repeated? - A great helper does more composer navboxes now, Bach has much more, for example. - on missing, see also --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:06, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

I suppose you could put [[#foo|see below]] in a relevant parameter in the infobox, where #foo is an anchor for the navbox. I'm not sure whether other editors would accept that, mind. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:59, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

You were right, they don't like it, pointing at the rules that prohibit linking to the article. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:01, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

"Rules"?! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:36, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

quote "Incidentally, the guidelines on infoboxes are to not use them to navigate to sections of the page itself." - where would that be? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:55, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) MOS:INFOBOX#Purpose of an infobox, last sentence of first para. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:42, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

thanks for looking up: "Do not include links to sections within the article; the table of contents provides that function." - But now the navbox is not mentioned in the TOC, so the reason why I should not do it is not valid. Look at Graham Waterhouse where I tried: the alternative to linking to the navbox would be to repeat all the pieces listed there, with the problem of double maintenance. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:07, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)Gerda, I had a look at the infobox in Graham Waterhouse. The "Details" link provides no details of any kind, about either him or about the information in the infobox. Instead, it misleadingly sends the reader to a navbox at the very bottom of the page that does nothing more than repeat the linked articles currently in the infobox + a couple more that are already linked in the appropriate section of the article. That is the main objection to putting links like that in the infobox. On another point, there is nothing in the article to suggest, let alone verify, that he was influenced in his compositions by all the people listed there. If they were his teachers, then have a field in the box for teachers, but don't use original research to tell the reader something which may be manifestly untrue. For all you know, Waterhouse's grandmother may have influenced his music more that Robin Holloway. Voceditenore (talk) 16:30, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

I moved the teachers to the universities. So far I had hoped for an answer to a question raised above, raised because I feel like avoiding "influenced" and "known for" at all, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:53, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

The others might tolerate it as it would shorten the infobox. See my talk: a great helper does one composer navbox after the other. - Different topic: can you create an infobox (or 3?) for Anna and Bernhard Blume, two individual artists who form an artistic unity (photos, not music, mind)? (private note about them also on my talk) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:18, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

I was thinking of regular editors, rather than the crowd you see to refer to. What content would you envisage moving from infobox to navbox (I'm not sure where on your talk you mean)? Regarding the Blumes, Gilbert & George uses ((Infobox artist)), though that could admittedly do with some tweaking to make it more suitable for collectives. I'll get on that shortly. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:28, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Composer: the navbox is there, for some composers more than one (see Bach), no need to move because Wagner and Bach don't an infobox yet, which could be kept short by a link to the navbox(es). I will try here. (done, please look)

Blumes: I would not know how to get dates of birth in, unless using several - My talk only explains a connection, look for Blume if you are interested, caution: high voltage ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:54, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Bach: he was born before the calendar reform, how would that enter? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:16, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Handel the same, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:04, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) You could take George II of Great Britain as your inspiration (search for "O.S./N.S."); that is a featured article, so its use of two calendars isn't wrong. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:08, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

thanks! - I looked and feel not inspired, it looks confusing, - will dig a bit, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:16, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

birth date there is 30 October / 9 November 1683((ref|dates|O.S./N.S.)) - that doesn't strike me as granular. Bach is born 31 March [O.S. 21 March] 1685, Handel 23 February same year but his article is not concerned with the change, strange, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:26, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

I was cleaning up ((Infobox societies)) and thought you would be interested in either adding microformat classes, or simply nominating for deletion as redundant to ((infobox organisation)) or some university specific one that probably exists. Frietjes (talk) 21:24, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

and, there is ((Infobox MMA Training Associations)), which probably could use some microformats. Frietjes (talk) 21:24, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

and, there is ((Infobox HRM Community Neighbourhood)) that I refactored, but could probably be simply substituted and deleted. Frietjes (talk) 21:24, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

and, there is ((Infobox Submarine communications cable)) that I cleaned up, and has microformats, but may need updates. Frietjes (talk) 21:24, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. I will look at these later. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:05, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

and ((Infobox Harvard house)), which could probably be merged with ((Infobox University of Notre Dame residence hall)), ((Infobox Yale residential college)), and ((Infobox Rice residential college)) to create ((Infobox residential college)). the Harvard template is almost university-non-specific, since it has a |university= field. a couple field labels are slightly Harvard-specific, but most are not. Frietjes (talk) 17:48, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

All done (as you know, having commented at TfD). You could nominate them yourself, you know!Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:57, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi Andy, as I mentioned today the images from Scotland, I was wrong. It was not BBC, it is geograph.org.uk. See for example this image as typical representative. When I was uploading images from islands around Scotland, I found most of places covered by similar photos. Best regards --Chmee2 (talk) 19:53, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Ah yes, that's Geograph Britain and Ireland. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:04, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

I see, thanks for explanation. And if you will find some usage for some of Scottish images, will be great :) Hopefully more will come from London area soon too when the Sun will finally arrive :) Regards --Chmee2 (talk) 21:06, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Pigsonthewing. You have new messages at ToniSant's talk page.
Message added 17:05, 24 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

ToniSant (talk) 17:05, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at refugees during the Battle of France Interview: Editors discuss writing articles about the former Yugoslavia Op-ed: Prioryman on German V-weapon sites and the historian's responsibility

Hi Andy,

A quick Q: I have an account on wikipedia (the one I'm using to write this!) but when I cross to wikimedia commons I'm not logged in; when I try and log in using this account, it says I don't have an account; so I created a second account on wikimedia; then when I cross back to wikipedia I'm logged in under this second account!

Can you advise/point me in the direction of someone who can advise? Cheers!

simontcope 09:13, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Log in to Wikipedia using your preferred (original?) account. Then see Preferences / Manage your global account. Once that's sorted, you can disregard the newer account. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:26, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

That's cracked it, thanks Andy simontcope 13:38, 26 March 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slim cop (talk • contribs)

Hi Andy. Would you be able to offer this student editor some advice? [3] --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 16:29, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 19:46, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Andy, don't you ever look at talk pages? You will find the one here consists of nothing but lengthy RM discussions which have confirmed the present name. Johnbod (talk) 22:08, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

No; you'll find lots of objections to the name, resulting - over three years ago - in "no consensus", not consensus to keep it. I'm unimpressed by the sexist drivel espoused there. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:45, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Pigsonthewing. You have new messages at BDD's talk page.
Message added 19:58, 27 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

I'd completely forgotten about it. Thanks for the reminder! Nyttend (talk) 18:58, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Now we have someone else objecting that we need community consensus before implementing ((start date)). Can you go to WP:BOTR and attempt to explain that this isn't some hare-brained idea that I'm attempting to impose without consensus? Nyttend (talk) 20:05, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Road junction lists".

Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 08:02, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

In Mass No. 1 (Schubert), ((Infobox musical composition)) is used. I am looking how to best show a number (Köchel for Mozart, D. for Schubert). It's not really part of the title, but in many cases the item telling one Mozart mass in C from another (mass numbers not known well for those, too many). Should the composer appear on top, if yes how? The language is Latin, but doesn't have to show, it's default for missa. How to achieve that? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:37, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

What's the collective name for such identifiers? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:59, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Opus? --Redrose64 (talk) 18:01, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

More general: there are many pieces under a generic name, for example piano sonata, followed by no. x, in key y, catalogue no z, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:37, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

I think you'd just make those part of the name. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:59, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Here I wanted to make it granular ;) - It should appear in one line, but probably be entered as separate fields, all but the first optional. Catalogue number is the collective name, long, but won't show if combined, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:17, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

I added and changed parameters, applied in Sparrow Mass, Deutsche Messe and Membra Jesu Nostri, please have a look. Instead of "all in one line", I pick for the title what seems most relevant. In case of Sparrow, the funny missa brevis number of the article title doesn't appear at all ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:06, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Could I have 2 mins of your time? As I’ll be working on some other projects for Wikimedia Germany as well from now on the time I can spend on Wikidata will be reduced. This means I’ll have to figure out what is useful to spend time on. If you’re reading this could you let me know for example on this discussion page? Also if you have ideas how to improve the weekly summaries please post them. --Lydia Pintscher (WMDE) (talk)

Passing over our occasional disagreements about infoboxes, I remember you were at the last editathon I went to and I wonder if this might be of interest? I'm not a ballet buff, but I have signed up, and I think some input from experienced senior WP editors such as you could help improve a whole chunk of the encyclopedia, if you are free and inclined. And if so, or indeed if not, can you think of other experienced editors who might be biddable? Best wishes. Tim riley (talk) 21:31, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. I've signed up. Are WMUK covering travel? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:43, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Excellent! Good point about the travel costs. I've asked the authorities (in the form of Andrew Gray) and will report back soonest. We must mention this in the notice too. Tim riley (talk) 22:25, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

I'll have to check with Daria (but she's away until the middle of next week, as I recall, so we may not get a swift reply). Andrew Gray (talk) 23:27, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jusdafax 06:01, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Why did you change the coordinates on Three Countries Bridge to point to the riverbank 2/3 of a kilometer from the bridge? Abductive (reasoning) 22:03, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

I didn't. I changed them from ((Coord|57|35|49|N|7|35|39|E|region:FR)), which is in the sea North of Denmark, to ((Coord|47|35|49|N|7|35|39|E|region:FR)), which was the same value as in the map template. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:12, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Ah, it was User:AxG who made those coordinates, but yours were different from the reasonably accurate decimal coords that had resided in the article for years. It pays to double-check since typos are all too common. Abductive (reasoning) 22:16, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello! On the Women in the Arab Spring talk page you had suggested using "Infobox news event" as the article infobox. With that infobox it seems like using general Arab Spring information would make more sense than using information specific to women because there aren't female casualty breakdowns or anything. Do you think that would be strange? Nadhika99 (talk) 03:40, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I do - you could always leave that field blank. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

When I called the signature messed up, I was referring to T13's signature. I didn't mean yours and I apologise profusely if I offended you.--Launchballer 14:17, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

I didn't think that you meant mine; I was pointing out that my comment on your unreadable sig could not be dismissed as hypocrisy. Please fix it. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:43, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the nice infobox on Holzhausenschlösschen. I had no time yet, appreciate it even more. I added one to the church that decorates the Main page right now, perhaps check. I am not happy with the long bold partly blue names for the parameters. - I love your ((infobox opera)) sample, first credited Voceditenore with that dramah ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:16, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Done. We'd need to edit the template to change those labels. Thank you for your kind words. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:18, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

I will have to expand the article, to avoid the section collapse ;) - When I add a collapsed list to an infobox, the line above it looks strange, example Mass in B minor structure, why? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:56, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Next: Lichtental Church, - I don't see a way to mention the nickname, and find 3 lines for "people" too much. Coords? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:58, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Coordinates added (I found them on the page or the lead image). I've added |other_name= (maybe better centred, without a label?). Do you mean three lines for the architects? Looks OK to me. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:16, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

see Template talk:Infobox church#other_name. Frietjes (talk) 21:17, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, both, for the other name! - 3 lines: no, I mean "Significant associated people" - would they be mentioned if not significant? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:29, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Understood - and fixed. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:37, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! - Look at their seal: Zu den 14 Nothelfern (top) - Pfarre Lichtental (bottom), - if one line, "zu", not "Zu", and no break after 14, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

I didn't think of the logical inference that the layout I provided there might cause - by including coords as a special case of "existing", and not elsewhere, it implied its a quirk of the existing not accepted elsewhere. I only included it in first place to show both actual RJLs we have for the M5. If there was any misrepresentation on my part there it was unintentional :)

The 3 major versions now all have two variants shown (without / with coords). I've put the coords with the location data, as both are about specifying where it is and complement each other. Seems more logical than splitting the two.

I'd prefer DMS to decimal degrees for that usage, but thats a real side issue...--Nilfanion (talk) 11:43, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Based on feedback for last week’s call for comments we will continue this newsletter. However more community help will be needed. From now on they’ll be drafted at d:Wikidata:Status updates/Next and your help is very welcome.

I wonder if you'd mind looking in here and giving things a push forward (assuming you agree with the sentiments)? The suggestion, which which I completely agree, comes from our forthcoming hosts at the Opera House for the 22 June Ashton Editathon, and it would be good if we could secure agreement beforehand to make the change. Tim riley (talk) 15:51, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Working on that and other improvements now. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:34, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

I have sent you an email. -- -- Clem Rutter (talk) 19:59, 7 April 2013 (UTC)Clem Rutter (talk) 14:20, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Got it; thanks - I've been away, and am catching up. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:19, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM – Volume III, Issue III, March 2013 Headlines Australia and New Zealand report: The Sydney Wikipedian-in-Residence story (Part I): where, why, what Finland report: Preparing and Planning France report: Case study in museum newsletter; Akan; Sèvres; Quai Branly Germany report: Caesar and the provinces Israel report: Wrapping up a 6-months pilot project at the Haifa University Academic Library Italy report: Libraries! Mexico report: GLAM Activities in Mexico Netherlands report: Wiki loves Monuments and Sound; Hackathon 2013; Hebrew and Jiddish words Spain report: GLAM Activities in Spain Sweden report: Fashion edit-a-thon; cooperating with the Working life museums Switzerland report: Small museums Taiwan report: GLAM Activities in Taiwan UK report: Workshops: scientists and photographs USA report: Chemical Heritage Foundation resident sought; editathons in D.C. and New York Open Access report: Topic Pages; Open Access on Wikispecies Calendar: April's GLAM events Read this edition in full • Single-page To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

This is to inform you that this article has been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 Vauxhall helicopter crash. - Ahunt (talk) 15:04, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi there Pigs. It has recently been brought to my attention that Template:Infobox yeshiva was deleted, see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 March 20#Template:Infobox yeshiva, based on only your nomination and one other vote, because you had nominated it for deletion. I was doubly surprised to see that it was deleted without any input at all from WP:EXPERT editors with WP:COMPETENCE familiar with this particular topic who may have wanted to participate in the TFD had they known about if you would have placed a notification at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Judaism or if you had tried to ask for some input at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism. I certainly would have wanted to discuss the proposal because of my familiarity with the topic of Category:Yeshivas that are the unique core educational institutions of Orthodox Judaism. Another factor that had probably complicated your nomination was that you started the TFD on 20 March 2013 a week before the major holiday of Passover when Judaic editors are usually busy with their own personal preparations for the holiday. Can you please ask for your nomination to be reconsidered to allow for fuller and fairer discussions? It would be greatly appreciated by many editors. Thank you in advance and yours sincerely, IZAK (talk) 07:54, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

I too was surprised to have no input at all from WP:EXPERT editors; you'd think, if this template and its massive, er, 16 transclusions, was important to them, at least some would have had it watch-listed, and commented in the week before the holiday. Perhaps it's an issue of their WP:COMPETENCE? BTW, my name is Andy. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:38, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi there Andy. Thanks for your response. No need to be abrupt, deprecating or sardonic because I am trying to be in serious communication with you. The fact of the matter is that there are very few active Judaic editors on at any one time to deal with the by now vast array of topics relating to Judaism. On top of that, the season before the holiday detracts from more Judaic editors commenting (FYI: editing WP is not part of "holiday preparation" time!), as I explained, because people are busy in real life, and I know from myself, I track lots of things (NOT everything, that's IMPOSSIBLE) year round but prior to a holiday my personal commitments preclude involvement online especially on WP. At any rate, watchlists cannot be relied upon, and the ONLY reliable way to notify the Judaic editors is in one of two ways, either post a comment on WP:TALKJUDAISM or even better, the BEST way is by making an "official" notification that no one can argue with posting the notification at the official Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Judaism. As a prelude to requesting an official Wikipedia:Templates for discussion, I am going to ask the admin who deleted to open the discussion up again so more editors can get involved once the proper and appropriate notifications have been made. By the way, I can live with any decision, but any deletion discussion must be FAIR to be accepted. Thanks again for your understanding. IZAK (talk) 07:34, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

can you tell me where you are copying this code from?

| data1    = ((#if:(({native_name|))}|<span class="nickname"((#if:(({native_name_lang|))}| lang="(({native_name_lang))}"))>(({native_name))}</span>|))

the parserfunction strips out the whitespace before the 'lang=', so this does not generate what you think when |native_name_lang= is set (omits the required space between 'class="nickname"' and 'lang="foo"'. you should be using

| data1    = ((#if:(({native_name|))}|<span class="nickname" ((#if:(({native_name_lang|))}|lang="(({native_name_lang))}"))>(({native_name))}</span>))

which correcting generates a space between 'class="nickname"' and 'lang="foo"'. normally, I would just correct this and move on, but I have now seen you add this faulty code twice, which makes me think there are more places where this has been added. thank you. Frietjes (talk) 17:48, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

I have a local copy which I will update. Any reason you stripped the final "|"? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:56, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

it does nothing, and to match the usage in the inner #if statement. but, otherwise, having it there or not is the same. Frietjes (talk) 18:08, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

The telephone number is incomplete. Should it be the number that's on the Lancashire County Council page? Peter James (talk) 19:05, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you; fixed. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:50, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Based on feedback for last week’s call for comments we will continue this newsletter. However more community help will be needed. From now on they’ll be drafted at d:Wikidata:Status updates/Next and your help is very welcome.