This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 |
I wonder why you have recently reverted the crime section to an outdated status with data from 1996 (e.g., gang crime) while ignoring referenced data from 2007 and 2008 on homicide. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.249.84.215 (talk) 16:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you, RJN. As I am sure you can tell from my comments on the article's talk page, I believe this is an article, NOT a list. This is true despite the fact that every list should aspire to be as comprehensive and well sourced. But, so should most articles. Lists are sub-encyclopedic without the type of context provided by this article. Nicknames of Houston is clearly a full-fledged good article, and should be rated as such. Thanks again. --Evb-wiki (talk) 21:08, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Please review and participate in the discussion to determine if/how Houston neighborhood articles should be merged/redirected to List of Houston neighborhoods. Thanks, Postoak (talk) 21:53, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Is your email active? I need to discuss something with you. Thanks, Postoak (talk) 21:55, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi! I understand you posted a merge proposal at Memorial City, Houston - But I don't see a rationale on the talk page. Is it alright if you post a merge proposal on the talk page?
BTW keep in mind Memorial City is a Texas Legislature-established management district, and that is why I think it should be separate from the general Memorial, Houston article. WhisperToMe (talk) 16:57, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.
We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:41, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
I noticed that you reverted my move from List of nicknames of Houston back to Nicknames of Houston, saying that it was an article. Actually, it is a featured list and should begin with "List of" per WP:LISTNAME. Dabomb87 (talk) 20:16, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi! You might be interested in the discussion at Talk:Galveston_Bay_Area#Sources_.26_OR. Thank you. Nsaum75 (talk) 07:13, 24 September 2009 (UTC) (Using ((Please see)))
Hi, please activate your email. Thanks, Postoak (talk) 16:57, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I have Google talk. Postoak (talk) 07:17, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
RJN, I REALLY appreciate your efforts here. This is a great show of good faith and I was not expecting it. For the first time since this all started I feel that there is a light at the end of the tunnel. You deserve congratulations for going the extra mile to be accomodating (and perhaps I deserve to be flogged for being so harsh). Let me review where things stand and we can discuss more later. Thanks again. --Mcorazao (talk) 18:47, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
So let me propose how we move forward. Obviously there are still some signficant disagreements between us but I'm hoping we are building enough trust now that we can move to a collaborative effort.
Reasonable?
--Mcorazao (talk) 03:21, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Can I ask that at least the boundaries question be discussed soon? We need to get rid of banners in the article.
Thanks.
--Mcorazao (talk) 18:46, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey RJN, I notice you've been doing a lot of good things about the Sugar Land article, ie: the u of phoenix spam. I have, however, retagged the article with ((advert)), which I noticed you reverted a while back. I thought I'd let you know and give you a chance to weigh in on the talk discussion Talk:Sugar_Land,_Texas#Woah.2C_woah.2C_woah.2C_bros.2C_NPOV.21. Cheers! --98.227.159.142 (talk) 19:31, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
I don't know if you still have an interest but there has been more discussion in the forums on Galveston Bay Area. Please feel free to weigh in before these topics are closed.
Thanks.
--Mcorazao (talk) 18:44, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
I am reverting the moves that are removing the spaces from the dashes. Please see WP:DASH, and provide an edit summary when moving. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:11, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
If reliable sources describe "Cougar High" as a nickname used for U of H, then it actually would make a plausible redirect. However if no sources state so, then the redirect would make no sense. WhisperToMe (talk) 18:34, 30 November 2009 (UTC)