This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for participating in the bolding issue of the election infobox earlier. We are now holding a final vote in order to reach a clear and final consensus. Please take a moment to review our discussion and vote in Template talk:Infobox election#Final voting. Lmmnhn (talk) 14:49, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your edit. It makes sense to put a threshold at 5% of previous votes. I'm just wondering where this consensus can be found? Is it a general policy on political pages, or is it specific to that election? I couldn't see anything about it on the talk page. --Jwslubbock (talk) 22:33, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
I'd welcome your feedback on my comment in Talk:2020 London mayoral election on this topic please. I understand the application of a 5% threshold but it seems bizarre that no account is taken of more recent election results - however you have clearly been involved in this discussion longer than I have so if there are any counter-arguments I would welcome them! Thanks :) Antonine (talk) 11:30, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Just wanted to say a quick thanks for creating those new council election pages, including one for my local council. Looking good! 82.21.211.103 (talk) 07:49, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
I thought you would like to be informed of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Torygreen84. Bondegezou (talk) 10:52, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
The source, from one of the founding members, clearly states that the JLM was "founded in 2004" as a "successor" to Poale Zion. These words are not ambiguous, it is a new organisation. The examples you gave are much more recent, where it appears the JLM have changed how they see themselves (some may say a political strategy). Please provide earlier source material to back up their claim that they were always Poale Zion, I cannot find any. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Westpier66 (talk • contribs) 11:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Next Plaid Cymru leadership election. Since you had some involvement with the Next Plaid Cymru leadership election redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:43, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Why are you including a poll which is the only one saying Johnson won when almost every other poll over 1,000 says Corbyn won? JamesVilla44 (talk) 20:18, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
I don’t see why a poll is needed we didn’t have debate polls in 2017 JamesVilla44 (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
You removed the Forecast UK figures from the 2019 seat predictions as you said it was anonymous, but the About / FAQ clearly states the authorship. Can we please have it back in. Peterould (talk) 09:40, 28 November 2019 (UTC) comment added by Peterould (talk • contribs) 09:15, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
OK - I'll move it there. Bear with me as I'm new to Wikipedia Peterould (talk) 13:19, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2016 Labour Party leadership election (UK) into 2020 Labour Party leadership election (UK). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:14, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
I see what you mean, however since there is a leadership election the membership had increase by 24,000 as the source says. And 519,000 + 24,000 is 543,000. It’s natural to have an increase in membership when there is a leadership election, ex members and supporters of the party join to fit their own interests. Thanks. Mxnkey72 (talk) 18:16, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Permanent secretary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Barrow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:16, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |