![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
i was wondering something i just got a new meds it is called hydroxyzine pam 25mg it is for stress i was wondering is it safe i also read the side effects and it said it could cause alot of things i dont remember but i am really scared to take it after reading the side effect what should i do — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.85.5.109 (talk) 19:20, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
BTW, I found a bunch of weird errors (see [1]) made by your bot/script back in December. Are those fixed in the bot? Anyway you can systematically fix the affected articles? Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 20:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
I've compiled lists of articles which have citations containing urls that could be converted to their parameters version (aka |url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/NUMBERS → |jstor=NUMBERS). Since you're running various bots/scripts for citations, I thought I might let you know.
Some caveats, these conversions should (at least for now) not be made on ((cite web)), but all others are fair game. Whenever there's a conversion, |accessdate=
should also be removed, since they'll be irrelevant and hidden (and might introduce errors later on if someone adds a URL, but doesn't bother updating the accessdate).
I've included my regexes, but you might want to run your own too.
I might build more lists for other parameters later. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 04:26, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
In Benzodiazepine overdose 69.165.139.174 has replaced "nitrazepam and flunitrazepam" from the ref by "temazepam", and "benzodiazepines" by "temazepam". Ref says no word about temazepam. This is insidious vandalism. Please proofread the statements against references in his changes. It was exactly cited to the reference before, he has done exactly the same before. It was reason for a deep revert. He adds statements to temazepam article too, which are misrepresenting the reference. 70.137.158.132 (talk) 06:35, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Trying to conform tennis players names to official ATP and WTA English is sure harder when this bot sticks on a "Categories: Redirects from titles without diacritics" on every redirect page. Someone moves the page to a diacritical version and sometimes before we can move it back this bot adds a catagory which makes the move back impossible without an administrator. Not very good imho. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:27, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
The previous discussion of this got pushed into the archive, so I will ask again: why do you persist in adding issue numbers (specifically, to citations of Science) where they are not useful, and (arguably) contrary to the initial style of the article? You previously claimed that 96% of such citations have such numbering, but I say that is crap when 1) articles are supposed to be internally consistent, not necessarily with the generality of Wikipedia, and 2) that number largely reflects your efforts in changing the choice of the orginal editor(s). I don't mind you taking a whack at them (on the principle of being bold), but once you've been reverted would you mind just leaving alone? - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 20:37, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
|issue=<!--not required-->
to the relevant Science citations such that no issue number is shown and so that I do not pick them up again to add the issue number, and so that other related tools and scripts, some of which I also use, don't add the issue numbers either. I do not think this is the overall appropriate action but propose it to address the specific concern on these specific articles. Rjwilmsi 01:06, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
When pasting the cursor moves on the right x places, where x is the number of break lines of the pasted text. -- Magioladitis (talk) 23:31, 29 July 2011 (UTC)