This page is an archive of User Talk:Seresin (or perhaps something else). If you wish to discuss something here, feel free to bring it up again. The history for this page is here, not on the main talk page. Thanks. |
Archives Until August 2007 — September 2007 |
The Surreal Barnstar | ||
Because you always seem to come up with some hilariously wild stuff, that is insightful, helpful, and amusing, all rolled into one great big i package! Ariel♥Gold 09:13, 1 October 2007 (UTC) |
If you have a problem with an image, deal with the image. And please spare us the snippy comments. Lou Sander 05:07, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Good Work it only took you 12 seconds to delete the comment that i put on jimbos user page..... you obviously don't have much of a life do you.....(58.107.165.52)
Thank you - my point proven - you don't have a life!
Have a Nice Day, and remeber jimbo wales is an up-himself pig, so don't act like he's a hero, he wouldn't piss on you of you were on fire! have fun! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.107.165.52 (talk) 06:38, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
See i think my comment on his talk page raises a valid point abour resourcing. Editors use all of their time protecting jimbos page, when they should be protecting other pages which have important info on it. For example, if i was to write "Alan Carpenter resigns as WA Premier" on Alan Carpenter's page, it would take some time before it was deleted, and i think that comment is much more devestating than saying jimbo is up-himself. don't you agree? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.107.165.52 (talk) 06:44, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Removed the bar. Thanks for the heads up. STORMTRACKER 94 22:22, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
No deleted contributions please but now I put the "subst" thing--Angel David 23:14, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you, really whats the point in protecting jimbos page?? thanks anyay for your acknowledgement - a lot of editors wouldn't even speak to me! thanks again. (58.107.165.52 01:56, 3 October 2007 (UTC))
[1] Into The Fray T/C 02:50, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
I'd suggest backing off of Lou Sander's talk page. Yes, it sucks, and yes, I think you're in the right to be upset about his comments, but any responses from you will only serve to exacerbate the situation. Bleh. EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:40, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
(doing the right thing sucks sometimes)
Just asking, why do you loathe the existence of templates like ((vangel)) in the template namespace? ~ Sebi [talk] 00:35, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Please tell me how to complete that last remianing thing. Sorry the response took so long.--Angel David 00:42, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
I mean that it is watched and monitored more closely than other pages and because the general public cannot really be mislead by vandalism on jimbos page (beacause it does not contain important information), but (the public) can be significantly mislead by vandalism on other articles.
People use wikipedia articles for info and if the articles are vandalised then the info is incorrect and this can have devestating effects (especially on uni/college students doing exams or assignments) whereas if jimbos page is vandalised it doesn't have devestating effects (unless someone is doing an assignment on him!).
Therefore i feel that rather than trying to protect jimbo as vigorously as everyone does, they should just leave his page til last to fix, and worry about the important articles first.
Cheers!
(58.107.165.52 00:57, 4 October 2007 (UTC))
It's weird. I originally made "Halpern, a.d.", but didn't like the lowercase "a.d.", so I tried to create "Halpern, A.D.". However, the similarity between the two prevented me from creating "Halpern, A.D.", so I created "adhalpern" so I could usurp the name and change it to "Halpern, A.D.". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Halpern, a.d. (talk • contribs) 00:59, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
I just want to thank you (a bit late) for supporting my RfA, which passed 63 to 1. Thanks again, and I hope to do my best to make sure that your "good vibe" was a correct one. Bearian 01:42, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
I am giving you all these barnstars (wiki awards) for guiding me.--Angel David 02:30, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
No problem, I was glad to do it (it helps us all). And thanks for this: . It cheered me up.--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions) 02:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
They will move that to right? Because I am thinking of putting something on my naimspace. This willbe the most important part of my naimspace.--Angel David 02:17, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Yes it does. But one remaining question...when is my name...going to change?--Angel David 14:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
What are you talking about?--Angel David 00:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
I don't know what you mean by "my speedy function". I collect scripts, I don't make them. My "speedy" file is actually something that I made and used when Azatooth's was down. I now use "User:AzaToth/twinklespeedy.js" instead. A good idea would be simply to import User:Wikidudeman/Hodgepodge completely, See it's page for details. As far as NOT notifying users, This is possible however I don't advise it. It's customary to notify users when you nominate their pages for speedy deletion. Wikidudeman (talk) 13:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
The problem I'm facing is this:
I'm not allowed to create the account "Halpern, A.D.", because each time I attempt to, I get this message: "The name "Halpern, A.D." is very similar to the existing account "Halpern, a.d." (contributions • logs • user creation entry). Please choose another name, or request an administrator to create this account for you. " I've already requested an account creation, but was declined, and the usurpation/name change was declined also, so I just can't seem to make the account...
Any ideas as to what I should do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Halpern, a.d. (talk • contribs) 19:48, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
I lumped them together because they all seemed to be related, with the elems feeding the middle school. It was my first mass nom, so I'll steer clear of those. J-ſtanTalkContribs 16:15, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Just a quick note, you've advised Rambutan that deleting redirects to his new user and talk pages would be permitted after he was renamed, we don't normally do this, as it can cause great confusion amongst users who don't know about the Rename Log, as well as leaving a significant amount of redlinks on pages which can give the impression the user has left the project. Unless there are mitigating circumstances, then we wouldn't normally delete these redirects. Hopefully this will prevent any future confusion where a rename clerk has advised something that administrators won't routinely carry out. Nick 12:50, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
In the development of this issue. It appears that user was found to be a sockpuppet, and has been blocked indef. I'm not familiar with that case, but I trust the admins and bureaucrats who recognize the sock. Anyway thought you'd like to know. Ariel♥Gold 20:11, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
[2] I went to one of these in Aspen one year, what an amazing sight! I have a ton of photos from it, I should scan a few in and upload them. Ariel♥Gold 01:31, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
The main concern was centered around Conflict of Interest issues. Secondary sources are noted, but consensus in the AfD agree that they are deemed not significant enough to mitigate COI. - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 03:32, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi - and thanks for looking after my talk page. I'm not even sure what the beef was! --Jack Merridew 08:06, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Well, I(User Wilhelmina Will) guess you're right on that. I(User Wilhelmina Will have a problem with having a rather quick temper, and I(User Wilhemlina Will) need to teach myself to control it. As for not reverting edits a user made to their own talkpage or userpage, tell that to WharthogDemon. Wilhelmina Will 03:05, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
I'd rather not talk about what he did; it reminds me of a hurtful time period in my history as an account member. I will say, however, that he removed part of the contents of my userpage. Wilhelmina Will 02:25, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Check this version out, and I think Fray fixed the display issues! Ariel♥Gold 02:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. Just to let you know, I've reverted a number of redirects you created to Busted from various album or song articles (Sleeping with the Light On, Air Hostess, etc). As far as I can see, all of these easily pass WP:MUSIC, as they are all major-label album releases or have charted in a major national chart (the UK Singles Chart being extremely notable). Don't get me wrong - I'm no Busted fan (indeed, I can'tcouldn't stand them!), but I have no doubt that these articles pass notability guidelines. Cheers, DWaterson 21:29, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
"change Inheritance trilogy to Inhertance cycle"
Sorry, but I dont really get what you mean.--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions) 01:53, 31 October 2007 (UTC)