Hi Sinbabad! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:44, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:45, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Sadowski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:48, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jean Palluch, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I was wondering where/how you learned of the death of the former cyclist Jean Roth. I noticed that you added a death year. Another user then promptly reverted your edit, stating that it was unsourced. I did a brief search for a source, but could not find one. Could you be of any help with this? 38.95.13.133 (talk) 08:51, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello,

I just added a source. It’s actually a newspaper, and it was given by a wiki User, "Jmax", on Jean Roth’s French Wikipedia page. Sinbabad (talk) 09:48, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your reply and the information. 38.95.13.131 (talk) 10:16, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello again. I have in the meantime seen that the same user has reverted your edit again as they do not accept your source (depsite the fact that the French and German wikis use it as a source). Separately though, it has occurred to me that if the death was announced on page 18 of the 3 April 2019 edition of the Blick newspaper, then the date of death can obviously not be 3 April 2019 as well. Blick is printed overnight and is a morning newspaper, so the death must have already occurred i.e. on 2 April 2019 at the very latest. I tried to get into the e-paper edition of Blick for the date in question but unfortunately did manage to do so. I think it is only available to subscribers. 38.95.13.132 (talk) 13:02, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ausberto García, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 1959 South American Championship and 1959 South American Championship squads.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can you check the date of birth you gave in his article? In your edit on the squads of the 1963 South America championship you gave a DOB of 16 July 1944 which is consistent with the statement that he was Bolivias youngest player in the championship (which he would not be, had he been born in 1933, so I guess that may have just been a kind of copy error). I do not speak Spanish but as far as I can tell the La Razon article does not specify a date of birth. In any case it would be good to give a source that does. Proofreader (talk) 21:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes 1944 is the right DOB I made a error while typing.

For the source of the DOB, I could only find a Facebook post and I know that Wikipedia usually don’t allow Facebook as a source so I didn’t bother to put it as a reference. Sinbabad (talk) 22:10, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Sinbabad. Thank you for your work on Miguel Ángel Bazzano. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:32, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Sinbabad

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Albert Böhm, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: ((proposed deletion/dated...))
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|MPGuy2824)). And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello MPGuy2824,

If I understand correctly (I don’t speak English fluently), you want this article to be deleted because of the lack of notability of Albert Böhm ?

Granted, the guy is no Usain Bolt or Cristiano Ronaldo, but one of the goal of Wiki is to inform people and to be the more complete possible.

There is hundreds, thousands of pages about obscure Olympians like Böhm.

But more importantly, why do you care ? Sinbabad (talk) 06:37, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Sinbabad, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Albert Böhm, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Böhm.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|MPGuy2824)). And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:44, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Alejandro Arce. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 00:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Who are you to judge that the subject of my article lacks of notability ? He won the Copa America, one of the most prestigious competitions in the world, and it was the first for Paraguay !

As for the sources, I think I’ve got enough, as much or even more that for example your article about Mirko Tomianovic, an obscure Bolivian player who was only capped for the u17 team ! Sinbabad (talk) 00:41, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Domingo Martínez (1950s footballer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 07:15, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]