This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks for your advice. I will make the content more neutral with my next update. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjaminyiu (talk • contribs) 08:16, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
The entire "misuse" section of the macro evolution page is essentially anti-Christian propaganda. It makes statements of fact that are for from factual and cites as references decidedly anti-christ in works which are also not based in fact. If Wikipedia wants to remain objective on these types of political issues the entire section should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.71.8.136 (talk) 07:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
"If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Smtchahal (talk) 17:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)"
Hello, and thank you for your input. The updates were made to reflect the current position and title of Kahlil Byrd. Updates are reflected on the organization's website and need to be updated in Wikipedia as well. Mikary (talk) 17:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
"I appreciate your efforts to update the article, but I reverted your changes again because 1. the Mother Jones article does not even mention Kahlil Byrd and 2. we cannot use a primary source (see WP:OR). Smtchahal (talk) 18:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)"
Thank you for your help with this. I can remove the Mother Jones article reference (understood your point) but I am unclear on point 2. What constitutes as a primary source in my edits? I am new to navigating this and I appreciate your help in updating the page.
Mikary (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
The reason I put the ((Image requested)) template on my talk page is so I could upload photos to wikimedia as my account was not confirmed yet. Jay M (talk) 17:51, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You removed my message due to lack of a reference. I didn't include one because it's all over the news. Would an article from e.g. the guardian http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/10/free-speech-threat-universities count as a reference?
Kind regards! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.251.112.232 (talk) 14:40, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I was wondering whether this reflist cleanup is part of Reflinks or similar, or was a manual edit. I'm not sure that there's any specific policy regarding use of ((Reflist)), and I used list-defined references because it can simplify the reuse of references elsewhere within the article. I don't always do this, but chose to do so in this case. If my reasoning had been more obvious (e.g. if I'd explicitly included the refs= parameter, although the template seems to work without it) do you still think you'd have performed the cleanup? What do you think about all this? Thanks. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 09:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for guidance on my talk page! TitusFox 17:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC) |
Hey,
Thanks for warning me about incorrect info on my talk page! If you want to, How About A Game of Chess? TitusFox 13:36, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
I know what minor edit is called and know when to use them but in my browser(chrome) the minor edit button is always checked, I can uncheck it but it becomes tedious to do so. It does not occur with IE 10 from which I am writing you this reply. But I can't kick chrome because I like it so much because of its "ripped-to-the-bone" architecture and developer modes, I do lot of SRC fixing (image) and other stuff. —Soham 06:33, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Whatever I upload you are changing . So can u upload a new pic?this is from 2008 something. From a new event — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katebenghin (talk • contribs) 07:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
I am uploading on behalf of Adah sharma how can I use a new image . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katebenghin (talk • contribs) 09:36, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
I added it back. You better don't try to act too smart. Arjann (talk) 18:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
I have google him he has a done a lot. Can we change his name to the correct spelling Brandon Richardson. He has a movie and features in numerous ventures, I located his IMDb page http://www.imdb.com/name/nm5314171 and his social network. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.15.202.62 (talk) 11:37, 27 February 2014 (UTC)