Sorry for reverting your contribution. Because of the language of what was added, I mistook it for vandalism, a common issue for an article on this particular mental disorder. Sorry for that.

However, can you condense the text on the Theodore Milton ASPD Subtypes? The table is too expansive, which may artificially inflate its importance, where in actuality the Milton Subtypes are given little conceptual credence in current diagnosis and the research into the disorder. --Ireadandcheck (talk) 16:30, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on content on Theodore Millon

This discussion is relevant to your recent activity on the antisocial personality disorder article, though it isn't specifically about you or your contributions. It concerns the reduction of the section on Theodore Millon's subtypes of ASPD through the deletion of the descriptive characterisations of each subtype. This may significantly affect its content, including your recent contributions: Talk:Antisocial personality disorder#The Theodore_Millon's subtypes section should be condensed

--Ireadandcheck (talk) 20:03, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed your recent elaborations to Millon's conceptualizations of ASPD. The discussion above is relevant to your recent work, as if the proposed revisions are implemented, your contributions will be removed. I wish to hear your opinion on this subject before the revisions are implemented, or at least for you to have an understanding regarding the reasons for the removal of the lengthy characterizations of Millon' subtypes. --Ireadandcheck (talk) 05:20, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final chance to argue to keep the characterizations of Millon's subtypes. I will delete them in a couple of days. --Ireadandcheck (talk) 06:12, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Antisocial personality disorder has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Antisocial personality disorder was changed by Stuzzy1911 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861434 on 2016-04-20T09:19:41+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:19, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Antisocial personality disorder, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 14:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Stuzzy1911, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Antisocial personality disorder has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:15, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]