This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I knew you were going to do that! ;-) —Khoikhoi 08:31, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
I know about 3RR. Thanks.--Eupator 16:00, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
I read the rules and if something has a strong POV I am allowed to put up the ((POV)) tag and hold a conversation on it in the discussion why is Eupator allowed to constantly delete it and hijack the article? If I am not going about it properly please let me know thanks--Calgvla 16:06, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Accepted with good faith.My words; " behaviour similar like Vandalism" is not means "Tekleni is a Vandal",anyhow; I am backing all my adjective words related with you. Of course we can work together . But I want to see you in work. Against nationalist approaches. For example; I reverted "Pontus Greek Genocide" thesis page to your version. But You revert your version back with a summary "nationalist approach". Then you named yourself as "nationalist".Why.? what is the logic behind.? I think you understand me. My suggestion, Please stop your edits on Turkish/Turkey related pages for a period of time. Come to talk pages to discuss on. Lets find a concensus firstly naming the states/places as I offered one mont ago to Khoikhoi,Hectorian and Baristarim. I promise; I will never edit any Greece/Greek article, and also I will help to stop any fundamentalist attack to these articles. Please send your messages in Turkish,(I know that you know veryweel better than my English)also. Regards. Mustafa Akalp 14:57, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Since you are involved, I am just keeping you in the loop on this user. I'm sure you are aware that I have blocked him. I have also directed him to file a request for comment if he wants to get some additional community feedback on his viewpoints.
More important, I have told him that other editors may remove his Talk page posts on Armenia and Armenians if they are inflammatory or racially charged, since he has asked me to look at the issue. HOWEVER, I have also communicated to both him and Eupator that Calgvla's posts should not be subject to blanket removal wherever he goes. If he attempts to discuss his opinion without being offensive or making personal attacks, I would expect his comments to remain.
Sound reasonable? --Aguerriero (talk) 15:20, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Please check atricle for last contribution, and put your oppinions on talk page. Regards Mustafa Akalp 17:47, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
...hell, NO!!! ;-) It's Ja. Bomac 20:01, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
...gia ri3e mia matia sthn Ellhnikh mou selida syzhthshs kai pes mou se ti apanthsa. •NikoSilver• 22:01, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Kampanaki-kampanaki. :-) PS.S'aresei to quote sth selida mou? •NikoSilver• 14:54, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Ya'sou and thanks, I don't intend to. I already modified the notice in accordance with policy, so it's fine now.--Eupator 20:59, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
If he wants people to keep an eye on me that's one thing, but there is no justification for calling me racist, I think that should be more than clear by now.--Caligvla 21:29, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
I think he was referring to the selective usage of the photographs of the "typical Armenian". I mean, you did pick the worst looking photos - the more normal-looking looking Armenians, you didn't upload, did you?--Tekleni 21:52, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
I have explained this before, they were the only photos I could from an Academic Journal that discusses the Anthropology of Armenias, I realized they were out of date with today's fashion, hence the label "circa 1910, 1911" I also kindly asked that if anyone had a more up-to-date study on the anthropology of Armenians to please post photos from that source instead. I think have had been more than fair on this issue. I am still looking for alternate photos. I am trying not offend anyone while still serving the truth. Many of you have really jumped the gun on this.--Caligvla 22:10, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
I just wanted to clear the clutter and keep the conversation on topic. --Caligvla 06:07, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Can you please honor Caligvla's request not to be called Turkish? I'm not sure what the point is, but I'm sure you'll agree that the faster we can move past this, the faster we can get back to improving articles. --Aguerriero (talk) 17:24, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey, one more thing. Would you mind using edit summaries when you edit the Armenia article and Talk page? It makes it easier for me to monitor the page when I can somewhat see what people are doing by looking at edit summaries. :) --Aguerriero (talk) 18:03, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
The RFC is going the way most of them go - I'm glad outside people have commented. There is not really a set policy on when RFCs close or who closes them, but it is implied that the person who opens it, closes it. The RFC page says, "After all parties agree the issue has been resolved, strike it from the listing." If that doesn't happen, it's open to interpretation what should happen. I will continue to encourage Caligvla to either close it and accept no change, or pursue other avenues. If the Talk page becomes a disruptive mess with no meaningful discussion, I will probably close and archive it in the interest of everyone's sanity, which will leave Caligvla with the choice of dropping it or pursuing mediation. It's been no problem - all part of what I volunteered for when I came up for adminship. :) --Aguerriero (talk) 18:27, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Dear Tekleni, remember your old messages. what is the differences between Newjersey and Nakhicevan? Put correct arguments.No double standarts. regards Mustafa AkalpTC 18:32, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
regards Mustafa AkalpTC 18:59, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Interesting. Well, I am glad he is exploring his options. If he sees that process has been followed here, he may drop the issue and take the higher ground without edit warring. Since the situation is clearly not in his favor, this would be the ideal resolution. --Aguerriero (talk) 22:09, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi Tekleni. I dont want to get into a revert war so lets see if we can reach agreement on the disputed paragraph on the Cyprus article. Here are my points, 1 - The italics are POV 2 - The words 'The northern part' - that could mean the northern part of anything, its just (imho) a poor use of English, 'The north of Cyprus' reads better to me. Adam777 23:11, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Please stop deleting my addition to Chinese people. My addition is backed by both American Heritage Dictionary and Merrian Webster Dictionary. It is NPOV. Nres 16:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
I have no objektion to call the patriarchate as "Evrensel Patrikhanesi" but in Turkish we do not use Konstantinopolis, I think "Istanbul Evrensel Patrikhanesi" would be the best for the article. (and also do you think we can mention "Fener Rum Patrikhanesi" too because it is the common name in Turkish?) Thanks--Hattusili 10:22, 19 October 2006 (UTC) Hi. I think the compromise agreed on at Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople is suitable. I changed Konstantinopolis to İstanbul, we may add the other names later in a proper way. Thanks for your help--Hattusili 11:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Your edits to the intro of the article on Cyprus are designed to push POV. YOur use of italics is POV, your use of the words 'regime' and 'styles' are being used in a POV manner. I will not enter into an edit war with you. Please correct the italics and re-word the offending sentence to make it neutral. You have already succeeded in getting the TRNC article locked and if you continue your antics I will request the same for the Cyprus article. This is my second attempt to discuss this with you, you would be advised to reciprocate. Adam777 16:35, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey Tekleni, thanks a lot for supporting me in my recent RfA. It succeeded, and I am very grateful to all of you. If you ever need help with anything, please don't hesitate to ask. Also, feel free point out any mistakes I make! Thanks again, —Khoikhoi 04:50, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Crap! You're already suffering from adminitis (i.e. adopting a pompous attitude and lecturing other editors on civility etc. all the time) - I should have never supported your RFA ;-) Don't worry, it was intended to be a humorous answer to the diacritic here.--Tekleni 00:03, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your efforts on the page. Your point about declaring a bedroom as a state is valid and hilarious:):) Sosomk 16:52, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Оуте о монос поу ехеис кирилика оуте о монос поу пистевеис оти (та) еимасте полу малакес. УГ1: Просохи стин парентеси. УГ2: Анеџартитоу периехоменоу еихе полу плака то линк!НикоСилвер 10:44, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Јати охи? Плака та ехи. Тин епохи тис Туркократиас, и ортодокси Алвани, ќе прин идрити и вулгарики ексархиа ќе и Вулгари, еграфан ме то елинико алфавито (и католики еграфан ме то латинико ќе и мусулмани (сумбериламванонде ќе и Турки ќе и Возњакидес) ме то аравико). Та анаротиете ќе о космос пиа глоса графуме, афу ќе еси отан су афисе минима екинос о анонимос христис ста баскирика (туркика ме росикус характирес), номизес оти итан славика.--Tekleni 14:12, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey, can you please fix the diffs. [1]--Eupator 20:28, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Oh yeah. :-) Khoikhoi 08:33, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
:) - Francis Tyers · 19:29, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Your userpage was already deleted. There's nothing to delete anymore. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:54, 31 October 2006 (UTC)