Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Children First Foundation, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 03:25, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thecurran. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Children First Foundation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 04:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Malaria Party. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 24#Malaria Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 17:02, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Zodiac. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Also it appears you have attributed to a source information that contradicts what the source said. Jc3s5h (talk) 13:30, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect PK-JK. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 3#PK-JK until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 (he) ^talk _contribs ^subpages 18:32, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't "be clever" with edit summaries, such as [1]. I'm not sure if the displayed text is what you were intending, but it is not helpful to other editors for edit summaries to look like that, with the overlapping characters and various sizes. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 03:07, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are any of the characters illegible? Are You reading on an iPhone? Thecurran (talk) 03:13, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am on desktop, and see * typography: ᶞᵉʳᵉ∄ˣⁱˢᵗˢᴺᵒ page p͡f; instead ᶞᵉʳᵉ∃ˣⁱˢᵗˢᴬ page p̪͡f . Small characters like "ᵉ" are annoying at best, and the "there exists" symbols looked like they were overlapping other letters. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 03:19, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What I'm asking ᵐᵉᵃⁿˢ≡, "Are any of the characters You just pasted unreadable for your browser?". I ask this ᵇᵉᶜᵃ∵ˢᵉ when I view this conversation page on my old Android phone, everything looks crystal clear; both the "there exists no ◌ such that" character ∄◌ ∧ⁿᵈ the "there exists an ◌ such that" character ∃◌ have helpful ruby text around them as pronunciation guides for novice readers like this ᵈᵒᵗᵗᵉᵈᶜⁱʳᶜˡ◌ᴾˡᵃᶜᵉʰᵒˡᵈᵉʳ. BʸTʰᵉWᵃʸ, are You on an Apple of some sort? Thecurran (talk) 03:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're not understanding. Why are you using Unicode characters like "ᶞ" ("modifier letter small eth", Unicode 0x1D9E) and "∵" ("because", Unicode 0x2235) at all? User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 04:00, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]