Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
Here are a few links you might find helpful:
You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type ((helpme))
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
We're so glad you're here! If you need help feel free to drop a line at my talk page. :) --Actown e 03:53, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Good work on the John Travolta article! Welcome to WP!--Lwieise -=- Talk to Me 03:49, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Superb job of changing that article from a laughable mess. Now it's mostly an article about someone who probably doesn't merit an article at all -- it's really yet another of Ludvikus' articles about the history of the Protocols, and someday we'll figure out a way to collate his obviously extensive research into something more suited to Wikipedia.
I just wanted to take a moment to thank you for your cleanup on Keith Olbermann. Nice job. I'm sure someone will yell at you for the lack of edit summaries, but it won't be me. --BigScaryMike (Talk/Contrib) 03:22, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi, it's nice to see someone even more liberal than I! I have a blog @ http://leftwingwiil.tumblr.com/ BUT more importantly, I noticed you did recent edit(s) to Eric Clapton. This article was demoted from being a Featured Article. I just wanted your opinion. I noticed you did not have an e-mail button as other Wikipedia editors do. if you want to answer the questions below, you can click onto V Schauf (talk) 19:19, 2 May 2012 (UTC) and press the "talk" link next to it. I want to make the Clapton article a Featured Article again. Do you think that this article deserved to be demoted? What would improve this article? Have you read Clapton's autobiography? I wanted to write to you and others who recently edited the Clapton article. Thanks for your time.V Schauf (talk) 19:19, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Good job on cleaning up Politics of Bill O'Reilly. Some of the editors have a less-than-pristine grasp of formal diction and tone; I've been meaning to work on it but have been without net access for a hot minute. Thanks! /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 20:37, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Nice work on the Vince Neil article. I had noticed that it needed some attention but hadn't got around to it. Jonesy (talk) 02:24, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Thuran was correct and I was wrong. Your edits were helpful; I had been looking at the wrong version when i reverted your changes. I apologize for the inconvenience. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 06:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for removing the section. Its always bothered me.--CyberGhostface (talk) 14:46, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for improving the article, I've struggled with the wording several times, you did much better. Mjpresson (talk) 16:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
The Minor Barnstar | ||
Thank you for the work you have been doing to The Beatles and related articles. LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:32, 27 September 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks for adding all of those sources to Patti Davis. ·:· Will Beback ·:·
Hi, my apologies, I may have clobbered some useful edits you did while I was attempting to revert the vandalism by 82.17.95.83 - pls check. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 22:31, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Great work on the Arthur Rubinstein page! The article as a whole has a much better flow now.THD3 (talk) 11:02, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey -- thanks for your excellent edits on the plot summary of The Island (2005 film). Also, just to let you know, I restored the detailed plot -- and then removed the fluffy OR stuff. Also, in the closing scene of the film, I don't recall seeing an island. Anyway, let's pick it up on the corresponding talk page. Thanks once again, --Otheus (talk) 22:50, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
The Cleanup Barnstar | ||
Your extensive work on Troy Davis case has greatly improved the aricle. It has made the article unbiased and eliminated the POV tone. I thank you for your dedication to NPOV!!! JakeH07 (talk) 03:30, 10 May 2009 (UTC) |
Thanks for your attention over the weekend to the Liz Cheney page...you improved it a lot. Phoebe13 (talk) 14:44, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
The article has been restored to an earlier version as your edits did not make sense and were not based on research, rather on stylistic conventions. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 12:05, 2 July 2009 (UTC).
Fairey's been on my watchlist for years, but I never could get myself to sit down and give it the go-over it needed (even more so after he got big with the Obama series and the article really exploded). I saw what you did and it was as good or better than what I could've done, therefore I feel justified in awarding this:
The Original Barnstar | ||
For great work on cleaning up the Shepard Fairey article. Bobak (talk) 03:46, 6 August 2009 (UTC) |
Good edits on the Rick Perry article.Athene cunicularia (talk) 21:32, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:31, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Good morning Treybien!
Good, and much needed copy-editing last night. Thank you. Just to let you know that a have changed lieutenant (not your's, I know) to lawyer. Also, changed "Soon afterward ... " to "At their next meeting, "
Trust you approve. Sincerely, -- Gareth Griffith-Jones/GG-J's Talk 08:37, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for tightening up the article. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
The Joker appreciation award. | ||
I award you for improving my page the way it's supposed to be by letting you live. May my legacy live on in this page. - The Joker |
Jhenderson 777 02:00, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your editorial contributions to Frank Underwood (House of Cards).
This user helped promote Frank Underwood (House of Cards) to good article status. |
.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:24, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi Treybien. In case you are not aware, there is an upcoming campaign to improve coverage of LGBT-related topics on Wikipedia, culminating with an international edit-a-thon on June 21. See Wiki Loves Pride 2014 for more information. If you are interested, you might consider creating a page for a major city (or cities!) near you, with a list of LGBT-related articles that need to be created or improved. This would be a tremendous help to Wikipedia and coverage of LGBT culture and history. Thanks for your consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions! --Another Believer (Talk) 15:55, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
A page you previously contributed to, Joe Williams (jazz singer), had many prior revisions deleted due to copyright issues. For details please see Talk:Joe Williams (jazz singer). Your prior version may be temporarily restored upon request if you need it for reference to re-incorporate constructive edits that do not make use of the copyright infringing material. Please feel free to leave me a talk message if you need this done. Happy editing, — xaosflux Talk 22:29, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Hey there, I have noticed that you have done some editing to the Colonel James Braddock page. I really appreciate your help, especially since I created that page (under an old user name). I just wanted to ask that if you can of anything to help me keep this page up I really appreciate it. I want to add more to it but I am just trying to find the right things to add. Any help you can offer would be greatly appreciated! Thank you!Trooper 902 (talk) 22:54, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
The Million Award | ||
For your contributions to bring Joker (comics) (estimated annual readership: 1,501,160) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Bobnorwal (talk) 15:21, 11 May 2015 (UTC) |
You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!
Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!
If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing!
Please note that, per WP:RS/IMDb, IMDb is not considered a reliable source and should not be used in citations. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 21:17, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:30, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
How is Karen Jennings supposed to be Rampage in Gotham? Do you have a source that confirms this? As far as I can tell, they share the same first name, but that doesn't make them the same character. Is there viral marketing or something I don't know about that called her Rampage? DarkKnight2149 04:33, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited JT LeRoy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elephant (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Treybien. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
100000 Edits | ||
Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits on English wikipedia.The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts.Keep up the good work!
|
you can added this template to your user page.
- CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:36, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 19:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
I'm guessing it was a mistake, but you added [[Category:Incest]] to Susan Smith. I'm not sure what about her has anything to do with that, so I removed it. {MordeKyle} ☢ 00:51, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Category:Fictional victims of torture, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk) 03:26, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Please don't take it as a rebuff, but I removed the use of the decorative quotation markup in the Ripliad section. I added the "Quoting critics, scholars, authors" topic about markups in the talk page. So glad to know another editor has taken an interest in beefing up the article! :-) Pyxis Solitary (talk) 08:58, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Editor of the Week | ||
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your extensive improvements to the encyclopedia. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project) |
User:Buster7 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
((Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box))
Thanks again for your efforts! Lepricavark (talk) 15:30, 15 April 2017 (UTC)