Your submission at Articles for creation: Sudhakar Tomar (2) (June 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The references given certainly support that Tomar is a prominent businessman and a key figure in the Arab agriculture. However, none of the references provide significant coverage. Some are interviews, but in those, Tomar talks about himself, which isn't considered a reliable source. There needs to be significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources in order to write a proper article about him. Otherwise Wikipedia becomes just an index of business people.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sudhakar Tomar (2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:15, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Vissri19, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:15, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sudhakar Tomar (July 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sudhakar Tomar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 13:37, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vissri19: Block[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vissri19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Respected Reviewer, I am not violating any Wikipedia guideline, recently I got blocked by Bbb23 for Abusing multiple accounts under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikibaji. I have only one account on Wikipedia and you guys can see my edit history, yes when I was very new to Wikipedia, I mistakenly edited someone's draft but that account does not belong to me. I really appreciate the ideas and suggestions given by other reviewers, but Bbb23 routed my draft on another and I lost my work and content, not Cool. I request to all the reviewers, kindly unblock by account so that I can publish my article, in support you guys can check the both accounts IP. I really need your support in completing my work. Thank You guys for your support.

Decline reason:

From the technical and behavioural evidence it seems likely that you are part of a paid-editing scheme. We can't tell whether you're the same person operating those other accounts that are technically indistinguishable from yours, but that distinction makes no difference to us. Huon (talk) 21:54, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As this is a checkuser block only a checkuser can undo it. If you want this to happen it would help you if you made an open declaration about the twelve accounts which the evidence shows you have used. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 17:54, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vissri19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

why I'll make 12 account. Along with this I do have only one wikipedia account which I created unknowing, yes I have made a mistake by creating another. Please guide me how I can fix this else delete my account? and I was not doing any paid promotion, I was just doing only my college project on which I got failed. Thanks for generous support.

Decline reason:

Your request, which unfortunately shows your imperfect command of the English language, does not address the basis problem. You must explain your use of multiple accounts if you wish to be unblocked.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:28, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]