Wikipedia Arbitration
About arbitration Talk Arbitration policy (CU/OS) Guide to arbitration Noticeboard + Talk Search archived proceedings Ban appeals Report
Open proceedings All open requests Case requests Clarification and Amendment requests Arbitrator motion requests Enforcement requests
Active sanctions Contentious topics (Log) General sanctions Editor sanctions
Arbitration Committee Discuss + Contact Members Procedures Elections Talk History Clerks + Talk Clerk procedures
Audit Talk Statistics Talk Reports (pre-2016)
Track related changes
v t e

This is a page for working on Arbitration decisions. The Arbitrators, parties to the case, and other editors may draft proposals and post them to this page for review and comments. Proposals may include proposed general principles, findings of fact, remedies, and enforcement provisions—the same format as is used in Arbitration Committee decisions. The bottom of the page may be used for overall analysis of the /Evidence and for general discussion of the case.

Any user may edit this workshop page. Please sign all suggestions and comments. Arbitrators will place proposed items they believe should be part of the final decision on the /Proposed decision page, which only Arbitrators and clerks may edit, for voting, clarification as well as implementation purposes.

Lsorin topic ban

1) I propose that Lsorin be banned from editing in any way related to the Coandă-1910 aircraft. He has repeatedly expressed a motivation to establish that it was the first jet aircraft, and he has written that he expects to be blocked because of this. Binksternet (talk) 23:08, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Examples

• 2 November 2010: "If there is still some admin which understands the disaster created by the current content of this article for the credibility of Wikipedia in general ( Coanda-1910 is generally accepted as the first jet aircraft, and only two authors have tried to prove with some very selected information like this "selling of the plane" that is was not a jet) than I will ask that the article is put again to the blocking state for another month and add the expert tag and POV tag back to the article or just block me for ever in editing anything in this Wiki as anyway I'm just ignored by admins with any kind of request for help."
• 3 November 2010: "Block me forever and you can remove my account altogether as you are one of the Gods of Wikipedia! I did asked this many times. At least I will be happy with myself that I have tried everything possible to correct the lies written in a public site about Coanda-1910."
• 15 December 2010: "I hope that my account by be blocked permanently or erased from Wikipedia to prove how biased it is."
• 6 February 2011: "I know that my account will be blocked immediately, when I will start editing again the article Coandă-1910".

Comment by Arbitrators:

Could we have a link or diff for the last point ("has written that he expect to be blocked because of this"), please? Newyorkbrad (talk) 02:11, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by parties:

Newyorkbrad, I was threatened that I will be blocked permanently and for longer period by the "uninvolved" Fut.Perf. "And I will add to this the warning that the next time you are found pushing this agenda against existing consensus, there will be a much longer block". Discussion for consensus was tried after that [1], just to be threatened this time by Binksternet that I will be taken to WP:ANI again. This is an explanation as well for "uninvolved" Fut.Perf. accusation, of not touching Coanda-1910 since January.--Lsorin (talk) 21:51, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by others:

Answer to NYB's question above: "I know that my account will be blocked immediately, when I will start editing again the article Coandă-1910" [2]. – Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:53, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template

2)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

3)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

2)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

3)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

4)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed final decision

Proposed principles

Template

1) {text of Proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of Proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed findings of fact

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed enforcement

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed principles

Template

1) {text of Proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of Proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed findings of fact

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed enforcement

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed principles

Template

1) {text of Proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of Proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed findings of fact

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed enforcement

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

2) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Place here items of evidence (with diffs) and detailed analysis

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Comment by Arbitrators:

A topic ban is not a block, and you remain free to edit in any other topic under the sun—from mathematics, to pop culture, to ancient pottery. I encourage you to continue editing Wikipedia, in an area where you are less likely to find yourself in conflict. Cool Hand Luke 14:09, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by parties: LSorin

It is incredible to see the huge amount of ignorance of the arbitrators, which in the end prevail in supporting the American and English bias, in a so called World Wide Encyclopedia. First of all, how dumb the arbitrators of this forum can be, to block the person how raised the case up? Would I raise up the case, just because I want to be blocked? From the results of the voting it is clear that not a single arbitrator did even checked the evidence I listed, as there is not a single mention of the OWNERs of the Coanda-1910 article. Anyway, the link to this page will show why Wikipedia does not work and why it will never considered seriously, by any academic, historical and scientific media. Anyway the fact that Coanda-1910 was the first jet airplane cannot be removed from the history by star editors of Wikipedia or ignorant arbitrators.

Comment by others: