The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.
Sorry, User:Skarmory, this AFD didn't get wider participation. If you want discussion on the questions you raised, you'll have to take it to a policy talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 04:16, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Violates WP:TWODAB in its current state. If a link to the SH year is needed, it's best done as a hatnote, but I feel like that sets up a precedent that should at least be handled via wider community discussion. (Some questions: If a hatnote is kept, should there be hatnotes on Julian/Gregorian year articles mentioning the equivalent year in other calendar systems? Which calendar systems? Should there be DAB pages for these? etc.) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 04:24, 6 July 2023 (UTC)