The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:23, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1x1 music

[edit]

Doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG. No assertion of notability. Sources I found are are few and very weak - [1], [2]. The company existed and recorded some low notability bands, but there seems little to say about them other than that. SilkTork *^YES! 19:34, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is nothing about this article that makes worthy of keeping. TopGearFreak ^Talk 19:45, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability not established and unlikely to be established. SlubGlub (talk) 20:46, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:44, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:44, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails notability per WP:CORP. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 04:09, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not meet WP:CORP. There is very little coverage, none of it substantial, and what little notability is asserted is inherited from the various bands. Reyk _YO! 04:39, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.