The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SOFTDELETE per low participation herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Radical European Masters season

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article merely gives a list of provisional dates, and contains no prose describing this motorsport series, or even any indication that the series actually took place. Even if there was some referenced content, this series is a low ranking non-professional event, with sparse non-routine coverage, so does not meet the WP:GNG criteria. QueenCake (talk) 20:16, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This was the website of the series [1] and with this I also think that we should also add Radical European Masters to the list. Matt294069 is coming 00:26, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:08, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:00, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:22, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete at best for now as none of this actually imagines better solid independent notability and there's no better context to actually convince keeping. SwisterTwister talk 22:41, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:25, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.