The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  13:02, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2015 New Orleans airport attack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no indication for notability, as there has been no news coverage in the weeks and months following the attack. Plus, there is no substantial information about the attack on the page. Libertarian12111971 (talk) 18:51, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 19:03, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 19:04, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - An unfortunate event that is not notable.--Rpclod (talk) 21:15, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clearly not notable if I'm not hearing any long-lasting news coverage on the event. CitiV (talk) 06:30, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no lasting impact, not notable. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 19:46, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not notable Transasia07 (talk) 03:00, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, there has been plenty of media coverage. Everyking (talk) 10:05, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - there has been no media coverage at all, Non notable. –Davey2010^Talk 13:28, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • What? Sources given in the article clearly show otherwise. Everyking (talk) 17:45, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • My bad I misread what you wrote entirely, I'm going mad! –Davey2010^Talk 18:37, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.