The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to November 2015 Paris attacks. MBisanz ^talk 12:01, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Roubaix shootings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nobody was shot, nobody was injured. Aside from briefly being thought to be connected to the Paris terrorist attacks, this was a complete non-event. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Human3015^{Let It Go}  18:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Human3015^{Let It Go}  18:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge into November 2015 Paris attacks or keep. This event attracted a tremendous amount of international coverage. Certainly sufficient coverage to merit a permanent spot on WP, perhaps as a paragraph in November 2015 Paris attacks page.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:31, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – WP:NOTNEWS. The article itself reads like a one paragraph news story, and the references are all in the twenty-four hour news cycle. Googled "roubaix hostage" and "roubaix shooting" and filtered out anything earlier than December 2015 to look for ongoing coverage and found nothing. Therefore fails WP:GNG. Disagree in the strongest terms with merging with the Paris attacks page, since references clearly say the two weren't related. Aspirex (talk) 06:11, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into November 2015 Paris attacks. Coverage frames it as part of that story. (Also, perhaps not relevantly, the nominator's assertion that "nobody was shot" is noticeably wrong.) --Sammy1339 (talk) 17:40, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

None of the hostages were shot. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:06, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - for now atleast. It received plenty of media attention. And we do not delete article based on article quality.BabbaQ (talk) 14:56, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. routine crime. Certainly not merge, because, as was said above, it wasn't connected. DGG ( talk ) 07:03, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as the article explicitly mentions it was not connected and there are no solid convincing signs of its own article. SwisterTwister talk 07:09, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Revisiting the impact of an interest in the November 2015 Paris attacks is so enormous, that I continue to think it useful to Redirect this incident to that article, because the fears and hair-trigger security response that followed those attacks and was reflected in the response to Roubaix are a part of the story of the Paris attacks.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.