The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Macro photography#35 mm equivalent magnification. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:41, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

35mm equivalent reproduction ratio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is on a concept or neologism of apparently insufficient notability. It should be covered in the article Macro photography instead of standalone. See discussion on its talk page. Dicklyon (talk) 15:07, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I went ahead and merged a few paragraphs into Macro photography#35 mm equivalent magnification. So we just need to make it a redirect now. Dicklyon (talk) 05:52, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I will do that if the closer of this AfD does not. Dicklyon (talk) 15:41, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.