- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:08, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ALLINMINI[edit]
- ALLINMINI (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to fail WP:Notability and looks like a WP:COI issue, promotion for a new & not particularly notable company. JamesG5 (talk) 06:29, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 06:32, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 06:32, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. possibly by A7. I can find nothing useful on the web, but I do recognize there conceivably thee might be some in Chinese. DGG ( talk ) 02:28, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:08, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as I share what the others say, hardly even much for notability and even speedy material. SwisterTwister talk 02:46, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.