The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:38, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ATM (2015 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Similar to Amanusha, a film does not warrant an article in Wikipedia simply because Jackie Shroff is in the film. This low-key film, despite releasing in 2015, has no reliable reviews such as from The Times of India. Although listed as an unreliable source at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force, almost every Malayalam film that is notable is reviewed by Nowrunning. Surprisingly, Nowrunning did not review the film. Found a review from Nettv4u.com but it is listed as unreliable at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force. Out of the sources on the page, the only reliable sources are this and this (although the second one is just a release summary). A Google search of the Malayalam name gives nothing. The reliability of Mollywood Times is not listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force so it could be unreliable. Out of the sources from the past AFD, this source is a copy of the Sify source, this source is a passing mention and this source loads nothing. The previous AfD says that "any Jackie Shroff movie that has hit theaters is also notable" but sorry I beg to differ.

In summary, a film released in 2015 should at least get two reliable reviews. DareshMohan (talk) 17:48, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Shellwood (talk) 17:56, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. No reliable reviews found to pass NFILM requirements. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ab207 (talk • contribs) 19:13, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NFILM. Found no usable sources in search. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:19, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.