- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Aviation Industry Corporation of China. (non-admin closure) buidhe 01:37, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- AVIC Tianshui Aviation Industry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to meet WP:NCORP. The provided citations include a short article and database published by a non-independent source, and trivial coverage in a news publication. I wasn't able to find anything searching online in English. My ability to search in Chinese is cursory, but it is worth reporting that I didn't find anything relevant by searching for its title on Google. signed, Rosguill talk 05:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 05:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 05:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 05:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Although, I'm hesitant to make a judgement about the company since I'm not a speaker of Chinese. To bad it doesn't have a Chinese Wikipedia page that we could mine sources from. The lack of one makes me think all the more it's not notable though. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:46, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Aviation Industry Corporation of China - the parent company, which is notable.Nigel Ish (talk) 09:23, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:19, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.