The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:26, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A Circle and Three Lines

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Direct-to-video film with no notable coverage. Doesn't meet WP:NF. BOVINEBOY2008 10:58, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No indication of any awards or critical reception. The only coverage I could find was in a college newspaper. -- Whpq (talk) 16:20, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete but allow recreation on discovery of further sources. The college newspaper is a start, but more than that, imdb and the official website is needed. More, though not much more. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:03, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.