The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete G5. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:39, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Abul Kalam Azad (lecturer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All of the sources provided are non-reliable. insignificant coverage, PR profile, public directory and some link just list the name of the subject in theirs teacher/news presenter list. Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 05:14, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 05:15, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 05:15, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 05:15, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 05:15, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 05:31, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Note, article was created by a block-evading sock (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aldota), and there have been no substantive changes since that editor's work, so CSD/G5 could also apply. DMacks (talk) 05:30, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Tagged the article with CSD G5 - Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 05:50, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for tagging. But that's not a type of AfD closure (the afd endpoint isn't "tag for deletion by some other means", but actual deletion or decision that it's not to be deleted), so I undid your NAC. DMacks (talk) 06:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. - Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 06:58, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.