The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Vacated. Does not appear to be a good faith nomination causa sui (talk) 03:05, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Abundance (programming language)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy delete No notable references — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flylanguage (talk • contribs)

Note - This AFD was malformed. It was made as a second nomination where there was no previous. I have moved it to its current location. There was no listing in the AFD list for July 26. I have added it. The AFD discussion did not have the standard AFD template material. I have added it in. Note that the nominator is the author of Fly (programming language) which is under consideration for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fly (programming language). -- Whpq (talk) 15:23, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Doesn't matter since this article does in fact fail WP:N — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flylanguage (talk • contribs) 23:22, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note - The nominator does appears to be exhibiting WP:POINTY behavior. snaphat (talk) 23:27, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable enough- Referenced in Byte magazine and used by NASA in some of their software. snaphat (talk) 23:37, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.